Danelfin vs Stockopedia comparison

Danelfin focuses on Stock Ideas, Screeners, and Portfolio while Stockopedia specializes in Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials. They overlap in 6 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Danelfin offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Stockopedia requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with Danelfin and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Stockopedia has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. Danelfin is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Danelfin provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. Stockopedia doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose Danelfin if you need AI Score (1–10) estimates the probability of a stock or ETF outperforming the market over the next three months, based on daily analysis of ~10,000 features per stock across technical, fundamental, and sentiment data., and Coverage includes U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs as well as STOXX 600 European stocks, with historical daily AI Scores available since 2017.. Go with Stockopedia if Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. Stockopedia adds coverage for Closed-End Funds.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (CSV). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

Both Danelfin and Stockopedia include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.