WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON

Checking

 

Stock Comparison

FactSet Research Systems Inc. vs Thomson Reuters Corporation

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

FactSet Research Systems Inc.

FDS · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$11.5B
Gross margin (TTM)50.6%
Operating margin (TTM)28.3%
Net margin (TTM)21.5%
SectorFinancials
IndustryExchanges and financial data
CountryUS
Data as of2026-08-23
85/100
Moat score

Weighted across the company's segments.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into FactSet Research Systems Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View FDS analysis

Thomson Reuters Corporation

TRI · Toronto Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$47B
Gross margin (TTM)—
Operating margin (TTM)25.6%
Net margin (TTM)18.1%
SectorIndustrials
IndustryInformation services
CountryCA
Data as of2026-08-23
79/100
Moat score

Weighted across the company's segments.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Thomson Reuters Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View TRI analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: FactSet Research Systems Inc. leads (85 / 100 vs 79 / 100 for Thomson Reuters Corporation).
  • Segment focus: FactSet Research Systems Inc. has 3 segments (64.9% in Americas); Thomson Reuters Corporation has 5 segments (40.6% in Legal Professionals).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: FactSet Research Systems Inc. has 3 moat types across 2 domains; Thomson Reuters Corporation has 2 across 1.

Primary market context

FactSet Research Systems Inc.

Americas

Market

Americas financial market data, analytics, workstations and enterprise data solutions

Geography

North, Central and South America

Customer

Institutional asset managers, wealth managers, bankers, asset owners, hedge funds, private equity, corporate users and market-infrastructure partners

Role

Subscription data, analytics, workstation, portfolio, enterprise data, API and identifier provider

Revenue share

64.9%

Thomson Reuters Corporation

Legal Professionals

Market

Legal research and legal workflow software

Geography

Global

Customer

Law firms, corporate legal departments, and governments

Role

Subscription software + proprietary legal content

Revenue share

40.6%

Side-by-side metrics

FactSet Research Systems Inc.
Thomson Reuters Corporation
Ticker / Exchange
FDS - New York Stock Exchange
TRI - Toronto Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$11.5B
$47B
Gross margin (TTM)
50.6%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
28.3%
25.6%
Net margin (TTM)
21.5%
18.1%
Sector
Financials
Industrials
Industry
Exchanges and financial data
Information services
HQ country
US
CA
Primary segment
Americas
Legal Professionals
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Strong
Moat score
85 / 100
79 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Network
Demand
Last update
2026-09-05
2026-09-05

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Data Workflow Lockin

FactSet Research Systems Inc. strengths

Procurement InertiaStandards Registry

Thomson Reuters Corporation strengths

Brand Trust

Segment mix

FactSet Research Systems Inc. segments

Full profile >

Americas

Oligopoly

64.9%

EMEA

Oligopoly

25%

Asia Pacific

Oligopoly

10.1%

Thomson Reuters Corporation segments

Full profile >

Legal Professionals

Oligopoly

40.6%

Corporates

Oligopoly

28.9%

Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals

Oligopoly

18.4%

Reuters

Oligopoly

12.2%

Global Print

Competitive

0%

Act on this comparison

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.