London Stock Exchange Group plc LSEG
LondonExchanges and financial dataFinancials to Sep 30, 2026 · Updated Nov 11, 2026
Moat ranks
Balance sheet
| £B | Dec 31 | Jun 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash | 3.9 | 4.1 |
| Securities | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Debt | 11.1 | 12.9 |
| Net cash | -7.0 | -8.7 |
| Equity | 19.8 | 18.7 |
- Debt / EBITDA
- 2.73×
- Debt / equity
- 0.69×
- Leases (6/30/26)
- £614M
- Diluted shares
- 499M
- Book value / share
- £37.48
- Price / book
- 2.4×
- Net cash / share
- −£17.37
- Market cap
- £45.0B
- Enterprise value
- £53.7B
Per-share record
Key indicators
| Indicator | Latest | Vs year ago | Last 8 halves |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 6.7% | +0.3 pts | |
| Operating margin | 28.6% | +5.9 pts | |
| FCF margin | 26.6% | +4.5 pts | |
| Capex / revenue | 9.2% | -0.4 pts | |
| Annual subscription value growth | +6% | +0 pts | |
| Subscription revenue retention | 92.8% | +0.2 pts | |
| FTSE Russell-linked ETF assets | 2,193 | +37% | |
| Tradeweb average daily volume | 3.2M | +25% | |
| SwapClear client trades | 3.3M | +24% |
Margins and growth from reported quarters; company KPIs as reported in results releases.
About LSEG
LSEG combines financial data, indices, risk screening, trading and clearing. Embedded data workflows, benchmark licensing and regulated clearing networks support its moat, while data competitors, venue competition and customer budget pressure remain meaningful.
- Data Workflow Lockin
Workspace and enterprise feeds are built into customer analysis and systems.
- De Facto Standard
Benchmarks become part of investment mandates and funds.
- Data Workflow Lockin
World-Check screening is integrated into onboarding, payments and compliance checks.
- Two Sided Network
Tradeweb and FX venues connect dealers with customers.
- Oct 22, 2026
Q3 total income including recoveries GBP2.501 bn, cost of sales294 m and gross profit2.207 bn are now recorded. Organic growth excluding recoveries was 8.8%, subscriptions 6.6%. FY2026 growth guidance rose to at least 8%, EBITDA margin expansion100–120 bps and equity FCF at leastGBP2.8 bn. Planned Octus and Trumid acquisitions expand fixed-income data/trading but remain integration and regulatory risks. Workspace AI Search reached47,000 users and Deep Research exceeded11,000; usage is not yet a disclosed renewal or revenue result. Source: https://www.lseg.com/en/media-centre/press-releases/2026/london-stock-exchange-group-plc-q3-2026-trading-update
- Dec 31, 2025 · Full year · Restructuring charge −£133M
Integration, separation and restructuring costs reduced profit as acquired businesses were combined and operations changed. These costs persisted across several years.
- Dec 31, 2024 · Full year · Impairment charge −£216M
Software assets were written down after review. The charge reflects investment that could no longer support its carrying value.
- Dec 31, 2024 · Full year · Restructuring charge −£226M
Integration, separation and restructuring costs reduced profit as acquired businesses were combined and operations changed. These costs persisted across several years.
- Dec 31, 2023 · Full year · One-off charge −£85M
Transaction costs for acquisitions reduced operating profit. They are separate from recurring amortisation of purchased assets.
Ownership
Go deeper on LSEG
- Compare stock research toolsFundamentals, valuation and screening platforms for LSEG.19 tools
- See LSEG's price chartNo price chart here yet. See price history and indicators.17 tools
- Read LSEG's earnings callsTranscripts and audio of results calls, with management's own words.15 tools
- Investing tool dealsCurrent discounts on research, charting and tracking tools.89 deals
On this page
Financial record
| Fiscal year | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | TTM | Trend | Change 2016–25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per share (£) | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | 4.66 | 5.54 | 6.05 | 6.56 | 5.73 | 12.08 | 13.83 | 15.21 | 16.56 | 17.73 | 19.36 | +16.0%/yr | |
| Cash flow | 0.68 | 1.87 | 2.05 | 2.37 | 2.75 | 4.81 | 4.89 | 5.34 | 6.35 | 6.87 | 7.87 | +29.4%/yr | |
| Earnings | 0.43 | 1.43 | 1.36 | 1.18 | 1.19 | 5.78 | 2.33 | 1.38 | 1.28 | 2.37 | 2.83 | +21.0%/yr | |
| Free cash flow | 0.27 | 1.33 | 1.50 | 1.82 | 2.19 | 3.64 | 3.16 | 3.37 | 4.46 | 3.26 | 4.03 | +32.0%/yr | |
| Capex | 0.41 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 1.17 | 1.73 | 1.97 | 1.88 | 3.62 | 3.84 | +27.4%/yr | |
| Dividends | 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 1.01 | 1.11 | 1.20 | 1.36 | 1.52 | +15.8%/yr | |
| Book value | 8.73 | 9.14 | 9.47 | 9.79 | 10.48 | 43.70 | 46.42 | 43.21 | 43.01 | 37.53 | 37.48 | +17.6%/yr | |
| Diluted shares (M) | 356 | 353 | 353 | 353 | 354 | 541 | 560 | 551 | 535 | 527 | 499 | +4.5%/yr | |
| Totals (£B) | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 6.5 | 7.7 | 8.4 | 8.9 | 9.3 | 9.7 | +21.2%/yr | |
| Operating income | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 2.5 | +19.5%/yr | |
| Net income | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.4 | +26.4%/yr | |
| Free cash flow | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 2.0 | +37.9%/yr | |
| Buybacks | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 3.7 | – | |
| Dividends | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | +20.9%/yr | |
| Net cash | 0.1 | -0.6 | -0.6 | -0.5 | -0.1 | -5.0 | -4.7 | -5.5 | -5.9 | -7.0 | -8.7 | −£7.1B | |
| Margins & returns (%) | |||||||||||||
| Gross margin | 89.5 | 89.0 | 89.4 | 90.9 | 89.8 | 86.9 | 86.3 | 86.4 | 86.8 | 88.1 | 88.7 | -1.4 pts | |
| Operating margin | 25.8 | 32.0 | 35.2 | 31.9 | 27.7 | 16.3 | 18.3 | 16.4 | 16.5 | 22.8 | 25.8 | -3.0 pts | |
| Net margin | 9.2 | 25.8 | 22.5 | 18.0 | 20.7 | 47.9 | 16.8 | 9.1 | 7.7 | 13.4 | 14.6 | +4.2 pts | |
| FCF margin | 5.7 | 24.0 | 24.7 | 27.7 | 38.2 | 30.1 | 22.9 | 22.2 | 27.0 | 18.4 | 20.8 | +12.6 pts | |
| ROIC | 11.2 | 13.3 | 15.1 | 14.9 | 11.9 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 6.4 | 7.3 | -4.9 pts | |
| Return on equity | 4.9 | 15.6 | 14.4 | 12.1 | 11.3 | 13.2 | 5.0 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 6.3 | 7.6 | +1.4 pts | |
| Stock pay % of revenue | 2.3 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | -0.4 pts | |
| Capex % of revenue | 8.8 | 9.7 | 9.1 | 8.4 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 12.5 | 12.9 | 11.4 | 20.4 | 19.8 | +11.6 pts | |
Change uses 2016 and 2025 only: compound annual growth for amounts, points for margins and returns, and the change in amount for net cash. A dash means no 2016 base. Trend shows the fiscal years.
Moat
Moat scorecard
- Strength
- Confidence
- Structure
- Oligopoly
- Durability
- medium
- Trajectory
- stable
- Pricing power
- moderate
- Data & Analytics46.4%1 claim
- FTSE Russell10.4%1 claim
- Risk Intelligence6.4%1 claim
- Markets36.7%2 claims
Moat claims
- Applies to
- Data & Analytics
- Confidence
- Durability
- medium
- Trajectory
- stableas of Oct 5, 2026
Workspace and enterprise feeds are built into customer analysis and systems. Group subscription retention supports continued use, but it does not measure this division separately.
Gross subscription retention reached 92.8%, but Workflow growth of 2.8% and no separate division retention leave stronger switching costs unproven.
- Annual subscription value growth+6%
- Subscription revenue retention92.8%+0.2 pts
- AI interfaces can replace parts of the desktop and make rival datasets easier to combine.
- Banks can cut seats when employment or trading budgets weaken.
- Cloud partners and content owners can capture more of the value.
- SourceLSEG H1 2026 subscription and divisional performanceJul 30, 2026
- SourceLSEG and Snowflake expand licensed data deliverySep 30, 2026
- Applies to
- FTSE Russell
- Confidence
- Durability
- durable
- Trajectory
- wideningas of Oct 5, 2026
Benchmarks become part of investment mandates and funds. Replacing them requires product, governance and client changes, while new products remain open to competing providers.
New mandates, including a USD 3bn fund and eight ETF switches, extend adoption; USD 2,193bn of linked ETF assets also reflects market prices.
- FTSE Russell-linked ETF assets2,193+37%
- Large issuers can demand lower fees or create their own indices.
- Falling asset prices reduce asset-based licence income.
- Benchmark rules and index errors can damage adoption.
- SourceLSEG H1 2026 FTSE Russell performanceJul 30, 2026
- SourceLSEG Q1 2026 new index mandatesApr 23, 2026
- Applies to
- Risk Intelligence
- Confidence
- Durability
- medium
- Trajectory
- stableas of Oct 5, 2026
World-Check screening is integrated into onboarding, payments and compliance checks. Replacement requires data validation and workflow changes, but APIs also let customers combine competing products.
The 77% recurring revenue mix and a new named customer support embedding, but no separate retention history establishes a stronger moat.
- Annual subscription value growth+6%
- Subscription revenue retention92.8%+0.2 pts
- Risk Intelligence recurring revenue share77.0%
- LexisNexis, Dow Jones and specialist vendors compete for screening and due-diligence contracts.
- False positives, incomplete sanctions coverage or data-privacy breaches can undermine trust.
- Standard APIs and procurement consolidation can make replacement easier.
- SourceLSEG Risk Intelligence investor webinar, slides 4, 10 and 16Jun 17, 2025
- SourceLSEG H1 2026 Risk Intelligence performanceJul 30, 2026
- SourceSnowflake chooses World-Check for its platformSep 30, 2026
- Applies to
- Markets
- Confidence
- Durability
- medium
- Trajectory
- wideningas of Oct 5, 2026
Tradeweb and FX venues connect dealers with customers. More active participants can deepen liquidity and improve execution; this advantage varies by product and is not exclusive across the whole division.
Tradeweb daily volume reached USD 3.18tn, up 24.8%, extending network use; product share and fee economics must confirm that this exceeds a market-activity effect.
- Tradeweb average daily volume3,179,783+25%
- FX average daily volume561+6%
- Dealers can route orders to rival venues and internalise trades.
- Tradeweb volume can shift toward products with lower fees.
- Weak issuance and competition from US listings reduce capital-formation income.
- SourceLSEG H1 2026 trading volumesJul 30, 2026
- Applies to
- Markets
- Confidence
- Durability
- durable
- Trajectory
- stableas of Oct 5, 2026
SwapClear combines member connectivity with multilateral netting that reduces collateral needs. Its dominant interest-rate clearing pools are harder to replace than a trading interface. This rating applies to SwapClear, not all Markets revenue.
SwapClear processed 3.28 million client trades and retains strong product-specific share; growing Eurex activity and EU rules can still divide the netting pool.
- SwapClear client trades3,283,000+24%
- SwapClear interest-rate swap notional1,165+29%
- EU active-account rules can split clearing pools and force activity to competing CCPs.
- A member default, failed auction or cyber outage could damage trust and require more capital.
- CME and Eurex can offer incentives or cross-margining benefits.
- SourceLSEG H1 2026 SwapClear activityJul 30, 2026
- SourceClarus 2024 CCP volumes and share in interest-rate derivativesFeb 12, 2025
- SourceESMA preliminary active-account reviewJul 6, 2026
- SourceClarus/ION Q2 2025 CCP volumes and share in IRDAug 19, 2025
Profile change log
- Nov 11, 2026 · business change
Q3 total income including recoveries GBP2.501 bn, cost of sales294 m and gross profit2.207 bn are now recorded. Organic growth excluding recoveries was 8.8%, subscriptions 6.6%. FY2026 growth guidance rose to at least 8%, EBITDA margin expansion100–120 bps and equity FCF at leastGBP2.8 bn. Planned Octus and Trumid acquisitions expand fixed-income data/trading but remain integration and regulatory risks. Workspace AI Search reached47,000 users and Deep Research exceeded11,000; usage is not yet a disclosed renewal or revenue result. Source: https://www.lseg.com/en/media-centre/press-releases/2026/london-stock-exchange-group-plc-q3-2026-trading-update
- Oct 5, 2026 · analyst revision
Completed the acquisition and disposal comparisons: added Refinitiv transaction and integration charges, the GBP 171 m 2021 tax-rate charge, and the BETA disposal gain of GBP 618 m with GBP 164 m tax in 2022. These explain reported earnings without removing recurring amortisation.
- Oct 5, 2026 · analyst revision
Added the issuer's currency sensitivity and newer product-specific clearing competition: Eurex reached 3.0% EUR OIS and 7.7% Euribor IRS share in Q2 2025. Retained stable clearing trajectory and existing moat strength.
- Oct 5, 2026 · analyst revision
Added dated market capitalisation and four linked end-market profiles with market scope, competitors, rates, asset-price sensitivity, AI and regulation. No comparable whole trading-and-clearing revenue market size or public vendor shares were found.
- Oct 5, 2026 · analyst revision
Added ten years of reported GBP financials, six half-year periods, twelve revenue-only quarters and moat KPIs. Recorded re-presented continuing results and cash classifications, tax/disposal gains, integration charges and software impairment; kept recurring acquisition amortisation in earnings.
- Oct 5, 2026 · analyst revision
Added sourced trajectories, management and the bull/bear debate. FTSE Russell mandates and trading activity support widening adoption; workflow and clearing advantages remain stable under AI and regulatory pressure.
- Oct 5, 2026 · analyst revision
Replaced the unverified 40,000 Risk Intelligence customer count with the division's sourced 10,000-plus count. Broadened its competitive assessment to reflect the disclosed screening and due-diligence vendor landscape; moat strength is unchanged.
- Oct 5, 2026 · analyst revision
Corrected H1 2026 revenue weights to customer-contract revenue: Data & Analytics GBP 2,247 m, FTSE Russell GBP 504 m, Risk Intelligence GBP 310 m and Markets GBP 1,777 m. Recoveries belong to revenue; clearing treasury income does not. Removed adjusted-profit weights that were not reported shares.
Industry & peers
Peer map
Hover a point for its values; click a peer to compare. Dashed lines: industry medians.
Financial market data and analysis
Global vendor services supplying financial market prices, reference data, research, analytics, desktops and enterprise feeds to institutions and corporates. This broad spending pool is not just terminal seats and can overlap with index/data products; it must not be added to adjacent market sizes.
- Bloomberg
- FactSet
- Morningstar
- S&P Global
| Stocks | Moat | Gross m. | Op. m. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEG | 76 | 88.7% | 25.8% | |
| Industry median | 17 | 82 | 62.9% | 41.6% |
| Sector median | 49 | 73 | 61.5% | 35.0% |
| All stocks median | 398 | 76 | 53.1% | 20.0% |
Moat medians cover every stock. Margin medians count only stocks with collected numbers and need at least three.
Drivers & risks
- More automated investing and risk analysis increase demand for reliable, licensed feeds. AI can increase data consumption even when the user interface changes.
- Data rights, provenance and accurate identifiers matter when financial institutions put AI outputs into regulated processes.
- Financial employment, investment-banking activity and technology budgets affect seats and new contracts. Wealth platforms broaden access, while existing essential subscriptions and longer enterprise terms reduce short-term cyclicality. Volatility increases the need for analysis but does not automatically increase contracted seat revenue.
- Most large vendors sell dollar-based data but pay staff and cloud costs in several currencies. Exchange rates can move operating costs as well as translated sales. Interest rates mainly affect debt expense and client hiring or investment budgets; exposure differs by vendor.
- AI and cloud tools can reduce dependence on a proprietary desktop and give competing datasets easier access to users.
- Bloomberg, S&P, FactSet and specialist vendors compete for the same budgets; customers can buy from several suppliers.
- Content royalties, skilled staff, cloud computing and cyber-security costs can rise faster than customer prices.
- Outages, inaccurate data and licence disputes threaten renewals and create financial losses. Lawsuits or open-identifier rules can constrain proprietary security-identifier fees; integration and data rights remain separate competitive advantages.
- Execution-derived data providers can depend on an affiliated distributor or trading volumes. Contracts can support revenue visibility while renewal pricing and alternative datasets still determine long-term protection.
Bulls & bears
Can LSEG grow retained subscription revenue and cash after investment as AI changes how customers use financial data?
Arguments
What to watch
- 1Group ASV growth and gross subscription retention
- 2Workflow versus Data Feeds organic growth and paid AI contracts
- 3New FTSE Russell mandates and linked ETF assets
- 4Tradeweb product share and SwapClear client activity versus rival CCPs
- 5Reported operating cash flow, software investment and corporate debt
Next check: FY 2026 results: test upgraded income/cash guidance, annual ASV and retention, AI monetization, and funding and regulatory progress for Octus and Trumid.
Sources: company filings and dated sources collected for Find My Moat; market cap as of Nov 9, 2026. Not investment advice.
Free to reuse, commercially too, with a credit link. See the data license.
Moat Score 76/100 by <a href="https://www.findmymoat.com/stocks/XLON:LSEG">Find My Moat</a> (as of September 2026)Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.