Nasdaq, Inc. NDAQ
NasdaqExchanges and financial dataFinancials to Sep 30, 2026 · Updated Nov 11, 2026
Moat ranks
Balance sheet
| $B | Dec 31 | Sep 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Securities | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Restricted cash | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Debt | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Net cash | -8.4 | -8.4 |
| Equity | 12.2 | 12.0 |
- Debt / EBITDA
- 2.58×
- Debt / equity
- 0.73×
- Leases (9/30/26)
- $555M
- Diluted shares
- 563M
- Book value / share
- $21.30
- Price / book
- 5.1×
- Net cash / share
- −$14.87
- Market cap
- $61.0B
- Enterprise value
- $69.4B
Per-share record
Key indicators
| Indicator | Latest | Vs year ago | Last 8 quarters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 22.2% | +19.3 pts | |
| Operating margin | 30.6% | +0.7 pts | |
| FCF margin | 19.2% | +11.4 pts | |
| Capex / revenue | 2.6% | -0.9 pts | |
| U.S. cash-equity matched share | 14.5% | +0.4 pts | |
| U.S. equity-options matched share | 28.1% | -0.4 pts | |
| Index ETP assets | $1.16T | +40% | |
| Index ETP net inflows | $141.0B | +55% | |
| Licensed index ETPs | 487 | +11% |
Margins and growth from reported quarters; company KPIs as reported in results releases.
About NDAQ
Nasdaq combines regulated exchanges, listings, indexes, and financial-technology software. Its advantages are established compliance operations and liquidity networks, issuer preference shown by a 74% Q2 operating-company listing win rate, the Nasdaq-100 benchmark ecosystem, and implementation friction in Calypso workflows.
- Compliance Advantage
Nasdaq must maintain exchange registration, surveillance, rule enforcement and reliable systems.
- Two Sided Network
Liquidity attracts order flow and market makers; order flow in turn attracts more participants.
- Brand Trust
Issuer brand and distribution help Nasdaq win listings (especially growth/tech) and support recurring listing-related fees and issuer services attach.
- De Facto Standard
Nasdaq-branded indices (especially the Nasdaq-100 ecosystem) are widely used benchmarks for ETPs, supporting durable licensing and data demand.
- Oct 2026
Nasdaq completed the LeveL Markets acquisition, adding an alternative trading system with more than 2,500 buy-side and sell-side clients and broadening its off-exchange liquidity reach.
- Sep 24, 2026
Nasdaq opened onboarding for dedicated overnight market-data feeds ahead of its planned December 6 extended-hours launch, giving customers time to connect and test the new session.
- Sep 17, 2026
The SEC granted conditional relief for tokenized-stock venues and their liquidity providers, creating a new regulated entry path that can compete with established exchanges.
- Sep 15, 2026
Nasdaq Verafin partnered with Stablecore to combine bank and digital-asset transaction monitoring. The beta integration is planned for Q4 2026 and Q1 2027 rollout; no contract value or revenue was disclosed.
- Sep 2, 2026
Nasdaq completed the Dasseti acquisition, adding AI due diligence and monitoring to eVestment. The price was not disclosed.
Ownership
Go deeper on NDAQ
- Compare stock research toolsFundamentals, valuation and screening platforms for NDAQ.19 tools
- See NDAQ's price chartNo price chart here yet. See price history and indicators.17 tools
- Read NDAQ's earnings callsTranscripts and audio of results calls, with management's own words.15 tools
- Investing tool dealsCurrent discounts on research, charting and tracking tools.89 deals
On this page
Financial record
| Fiscal year | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | TTM | Trend | Change 2016–25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per share ($) | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | 7.31 | 7.76 | 8.50 | 8.50 | 11.23 | 11.65 | 12.51 | 11.93 | 12.78 | 14.28 | 16.31 | +7.7%/yr | |
| Cash flow | 1.53 | 1.79 | 2.04 | 1.92 | 2.50 | 2.14 | 3.43 | 3.34 | 3.35 | 3.90 | 4.52 | +10.9%/yr | |
| Earnings | 0.21 | 1.43 | 0.91 | 1.55 | 1.86 | 2.35 | 2.26 | 2.08 | 1.93 | 3.09 | 3.70 | +34.9%/yr | |
| Free cash flow | 1.27 | 1.50 | 1.82 | 1.67 | 2.12 | 1.82 | 3.12 | 3.03 | 2.99 | 3.44 | 4.01 | +11.7%/yr | |
| Capex | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.46 | 0.51 | +6.3%/yr | |
| Dividends | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 1.04 | 1.16 | +11.3%/yr | |
| Book value | 10.72 | 11.56 | 10.83 | 11.26 | 12.85 | 12.66 | 12.35 | 21.27 | 19.32 | 21.13 | 21.30 | +7.8%/yr | |
| Diluted shares (M) | 506 | 509 | 503 | 501 | 501 | 505 | 498 | 508 | 579 | 579 | 563 | +1.5%/yr | |
| Totals ($B) | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | 3.7 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 7.4 | 8.3 | 9.2 | +9.3%/yr | |
| Operating income | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.7 | +12.1%/yr | |
| Net income | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 2.1 | +36.9%/yr | |
| Free cash flow | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.3 | +13.4%/yr | |
| Buybacks | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.5 | +22.4%/yr | |
| Dividends | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | +13.0%/yr | |
| Net cash | -3.2 | -3.8 | -3.3 | -3.1 | -2.8 | -5.4 | -4.9 | -10.0 | -8.9 | -8.4 | -8.4 | −$5.2B | |
| Margins & returns (%) | |||||||||||||
| Gross margin | 61.4 | 61.1 | 59.1 | 59.5 | 51.6 | 58.1 | 57.5 | 64.2 | 62.8 | 63.5 | 62.9 | +2.1 pts | |
| Operating margin | 22.6 | 25.1 | 24.0 | 23.9 | 21.9 | 24.5 | 25.1 | 26.0 | 24.3 | 28.2 | 29.7 | +5.6 pts | |
| Net margin | 2.9 | 18.5 | 10.7 | 18.2 | 16.6 | 20.2 | 18.1 | 17.5 | 15.1 | 21.6 | 22.7 | +18.8 pts | |
| FCF margin | 17.3 | 19.4 | 21.4 | 19.6 | 18.9 | 15.6 | 25.0 | 25.4 | 23.4 | 24.1 | 24.6 | +6.7 pts | |
| ROIC | 7.7 | 8.1 | 9.4 | 9.3 | 10.7 | 9.7 | 11.3 | 6.0 | 7.1 | 9.0 | 10.7 | +1.3 pts | |
| Return on equity | 2.0 | 12.4 | 8.4 | 13.7 | 14.5 | 18.6 | 18.3 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 14.6 | 17.4 | +12.7 pts | |
| Stock pay % of revenue | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 | -0.3 pts | |
| Capex % of revenue | 3.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 3.1 | -0.4 pts | |
Change uses 2016 and 2025 only: compound annual growth for amounts, points for margins and returns, and the change in amount for net cash. A dash means no 2016 base. Trend shows the fiscal years.
Moat
Moat scorecard
- Strength
- Confidence
- Structure
- Oligopoly
- Durability
- durable
- Trajectory
- narrowing
- Pricing power
- moderate
- Market Services22.9%2 claims
- Capital Access Platforms40.7%2 claims
- Financial Technology35.2%1 claim
Moat claims
- Applies to
- Market Services
- Confidence
- Durability
- durable
- Trajectory
- narrowingas of Oct 6, 2026
Nasdaq must maintain exchange registration, surveillance, rule enforcement and reliable systems. That operating burden slows entry, but its SEC registration is not an exclusive concession: other exchanges and alternative venues compete for the same orders.
The SEC granted conditional relief for tokenized-stock venues in September 2026. Compliance remains costly, but this new entry path weakens the protection offered by exchange registration.
- Regulatory operating expense$11M-8%
- Regulatory changes to market structure or fee models
- License penalties/sanctions from compliance failures
- Policy shifts that favor alternative trading systems
- Applies to
- Market Services
- Confidence
- Durability
- durable
- Trajectory
- stableas of Oct 6, 2026
Liquidity attracts order flow and market makers; order flow in turn attracts more participants. Nasdaq cites being a leading liquidity venue in U.S. cash equities.
Q2 cash-equity matched share rose to 14.7% from 13.9%, while options share slipped to 29.1% from 29.4%. The network remains useful, but participants continue to spread orders across venues.
- U.S. cash-equity matched share14.5%+0.4 pts
- U.S. equity-options matched share28.1%-0.4 pts
- Fee compression from aggressive pricing competition
- Shift of volume to off-exchange/OTC venues (dark pools, internalizers)
- Technological latency arms race reducing differentiation
- Applies to
- Capital Access Platforms
- Confidence
- Durability
- durable
- Trajectory
- stableas of Oct 6, 2026
Issuer brand and distribution help Nasdaq win listings (especially growth/tech) and support recurring listing-related fees and issuer services attach.
Nasdaq won 74% of eligible operating-company listings in Q2 2026, including direct listings and SPAC business combinations, versus 71% in Q1 on the same new definition. Issuer preference remains strong; the old eligible-IPO rate uses another denominator.
- Operating-company listing win rate79.0%
- Operating-company IPOs15
- IPO market downturn reduces new listings and related fees
- Issuer preference shifts toward NYSE or non-U.S. venues
- Regulatory changes to listing standards or fee structures
- FilingNasdaq, Inc. Q2 2026 earnings release - Listing win rateJul 23, 2026
- FilingNasdaq, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2025) - 2025 highlights (IPO leadership)Feb 12, 2026
- FilingNasdaq, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2025) - IPO win rate metricFeb 12, 2026
- Applies to
- Capital Access Platforms
- Confidence
- Durability
- durable
- Trajectory
- wideningas of Oct 6, 2026
Nasdaq-branded indices (especially the Nasdaq-100 ecosystem) are widely used benchmarks for ETPs, supporting durable licensing and data demand.
Nasdaq-linked ETP assets reached $1.114 trillion across 481 products, with $109 billion of trailing net inflows. Inflows and product adoption support benchmark entrenchment beyond the effect of rising asset prices.
- Index ETP assets$1.16T+40%
- Index ETP net inflows$141.0B+55%
- Licensed index ETPs487+11%
- ETP sponsors switch to alternative index providers (MSCI, S&P, FTSE Russell)
- Benchmark licensing fee pressure as sponsors negotiate
- Regulatory or methodology scrutiny impacting index brand
- FilingNasdaq, Inc. Q2 2026 earnings release - Index scaleJul 23, 2026
- FilingNasdaq, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2025) - Index business scaleFeb 12, 2026
- FilingNasdaq, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2025) - Nasdaq-100 ecosystemFeb 12, 2026
- Applies to
- Financial Technology
- Confidence
- Durability
- durable
- Trajectory
- wideningas of Oct 6, 2026
Calypso spans front-to-back trading, treasury, risk, and collateral workflows, implying meaningful implementation and migration work; large institutions can still build internally or replace modules.
Financial Technology ARR reached $1.870 billion with 16% organic growth. More renewals, upsells and cross-sells strengthen the installed workflow base, although ARR growth does not by itself establish customer retention.
- Capital Markets Technology ARR$1.1B+19%
- Clients standardize on in-house platforms or consolidate vendors
- Cloud-native entrants reduce implementation friction
- Large customers use purchasing scale to force pricing concessions
- SourceNasdaq Verafin and Stablecore partnership: integrated transaction monitoringSep 15, 2026
- FilingNasdaq, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2025) - Calypso platform scopeFeb 12, 2026
- FilingNasdaq, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2025) - FinTech competition among global banksFeb 12, 2026
- FilingNasdaq, Inc. Q2 2026 earnings release - Financial Technology ARRJul 23, 2026
Profile change log
- Nov 11, 2026 · business change
Nasdaq completed the LeveL Markets acquisition, adding an alternative trading system with more than 2,500 buy-side and sell-side clients and broadening its off-exchange liquidity reach.
- Oct 6, 2026 · analyst revision
The listing win-rate series now follows the new operating-company definition, including direct listings and SPAC combinations. Approximate recast annual rates and separate quarterly rates show issuer choice without mixing the old IPO denominator.
- Oct 6, 2026 · business change
Nasdaq opened onboarding for dedicated overnight market-data feeds ahead of its planned December 6 extended-hours launch, giving customers time to connect and test the new session.
- Oct 6, 2026 · business change
Nasdaq Verafin partnered with Stablecore to combine bank and digital-asset transaction monitoring. The beta integration is planned for Q4 2026 and Q1 2027 rollout; no contract value or revenue was disclosed.
- Oct 6, 2026 · analyst revision
The FY2025 revenue series uses the original quarterly statement presentation consistently with the annual report. Newer comparative reclassifications are documented separately. The $27 million former-Adenza-employee tax benefit stays in reported earnings because its size does not materially change the quarter's operating earnings.
- Oct 6, 2026 · analyst revision
Nasdaq reports R&D investment but no separate expense amount, so the unsupported zero is removed. Restricted cash now includes the securities identified as regulatory capital, keeping them separate from money available to shareholders. Fiscal-year segment weights use FY2025 net revenue; profit shares that excluded Corporate costs are removed.
- Oct 6, 2026 · business change
The SEC granted conditional relief for tokenized-stock venues and their liquidity providers, creating a new regulated entry path that can compete with established exchanges.
- Oct 6, 2026 · business change
Nasdaq completed the Dasseti acquisition, adding AI due diligence and monitoring to eVestment. The price was not disclosed.
- Oct 6, 2026 · business change
Nasdaq raised its 2026 adjusted operating-expense guidance to $2.530 billion to $2.570 billion as strong revenue raised compensation and IPO marketing costs.
- Oct 6, 2026 · business change
Nasdaq Private Market acquired Nasdaq Fund Secondaries, concentrating private secondary-market execution in a separately owned platform; Nasdaq retains a minority stake.
- Oct 6, 2026 · business change
Nasdaq stopped providing commodities clearing and trading services, reducing its exposure to Nordic power-market default risk as the business winds down.
- Oct 6, 2026 · business change
Nasdaq completed the migration of Nordic power-futures positions, earning an additional $88 million divestiture gain and moving toward a release of regulatory capital.
- Oct 6, 2026 · business change
Nasdaq sold Solovis, reducing its portfolio-monitoring software scope; historical revenue is presented in Other to preserve comparisons.
- Oct 6, 2026 · business change
Nasdaq announced the AxiomSL switch to recognizing on-premises subscription revenue over the contract term, including a $32 million Q3 catch-up reduction that changes the timing of software earnings.
- Oct 6, 2026 · business change
Nasdaq bought Adenza for $9.984 billion, including cash and stock, adding Calypso and AxiomSL while increasing debt, amortization and share count.
- Oct 6, 2026 · analyst revision
Moat trajectories, the investment debate and management record now distinguish benchmark inflows, exchange share and software adoption from market-cycle gains. Capital Access Platforms links to index licensing, its largest Q2 revenue business; listings and workflow data remain separate opportunities.
- Oct 6, 2026 · analyst revision
Exchange registration is a compliance barrier, not an exclusive concession. The legal claim changes from concession licence strength 5 to compliance advantage strength 3; liquidity protection remains separate. The listing win rate moves to an operating KPI because it is not a share of all listings.
Industry & peers
Peer map
Hover a point for its values; click a peer to compare. Dashed lines: industry medians.
Investment indices and benchmarks
Global providers of investable financial indices, benchmark licences and related index services across asset classes. Market size is provider revenue, not assets tracking the indices.
- FTSE Russell
- MSCI
- Bloomberg Indices
- ICE
- Nasdaq
- ISS STOXX
| Stocks | Moat | Gross m. | Op. m. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 73 | 62.9% | 29.7% | |
| Industry median | 17 | 82 | 62.9% | 41.6% |
| Sector median | 49 | 73 | 61.5% | 35.0% |
| All stocks median | 398 | 76 | 53.1% | 20.0% |
Moat medians cover every stock. Margin medians count only stocks with collected numbers and need at least three.
Drivers & risks
- Passive investing, new ETFs and customised mandates expand benchmark adoption.
- Rising asset prices and net fund inflows enlarge the base for asset-linked fees; derivatives volatility can raise transaction royalties.
- Mandates, product documents and investor expectations make established benchmarks costly to replace.
- Interest-rate changes can shift money between equity, bond and cash products; fee growth depends on which benchmark families attract the flows. Currency translation changes provider revenue even when underlying fund adoption is unchanged.
- Falling markets reduce asset-linked income even if existing clients stay.
- Large fund issuers can negotiate lower fees, use competing families or create their own benchmarks.
- Regulatory requirements, methodology disputes and index errors can damage trust and increase compliance cost.
- New products have no incumbent benchmark, so established adoption does not guarantee new launches.
Bulls & bears
Can Nasdaq sustain software renewals and index inflows while reducing Adenza debt, without relying on rising technology-stock prices or unusually active trading?
Arguments
What to watch
- 1Capital Markets Technology ARR and organic growth
- 2Financial Technology renewals, new clients, cross-sells and upsells
- 3Index ETP net inflows separately from market appreciation
- 4U.S. matched cash-equity and equity-options share
- 5Operating-company listing win rate on an unchanged eligibility basis
- 6Debt, interest expense and operating cash flow
Next check: Review Q4 and FY2026 results when announced and the planned December 6, 2026 23/5 trading start.
Sources: company filings and dated sources collected for Find My Moat; market cap as of Nov 10, 2026. Not investment advice.
Free to reuse, commercially too, with a credit link. See the data license.
Moat Score 73/100 by <a href="https://www.findmymoat.com/stocks/XNAS:NDAQ">Find My Moat</a> (as of September 2026)Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.