FinancialReports.eu vs PCAOB AuditorSearch comparison

FinancialReports.eu focuses on Improved Filings, Regulatory Filings Monitoring, and IPO while PCAOB AuditorSearch specializes in Regulatory Filings Monitoring. They overlap in 1 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both FinancialReports.eu and PCAOB AuditorSearch offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Both platforms target experienced investors. If you're just starting out, expect a learning curve with either option.

FinancialReports.eu provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. PCAOB AuditorSearch doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose FinancialReports.eu if you need Real‑time filings ingestion (<5 min typical) with continuous 30‑minute source refresh; 4.5M+ filings from 16,645 companies across 44 markets., and Programmatic access to filings, company metadata, languages, countries, filing types, sources; Markdown extraction endpoint for filing text.. Go with PCAOB AuditorSearch if Public database of engagement partners and audit firms participating in audits of U.S. public companies., and Search by issuer (name, CIK, ticker), audit firm (name, PCAOB ID, country), engagement partner, and filing date range (advanced search). better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks. FinancialReports.eu also includes ETFs, Mutual Funds, and Closed-End Funds.

FinancialReports.eu offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. PCAOB AuditorSearch uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

PCAOB AuditorSearch supports data exports to CSV. FinancialReports.eu has more limited export options.

FinancialReports.eu includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. PCAOB AuditorSearch focuses on other analytical tools.