FX Replay vs QuantConnect comparison

FX Replay focuses on Backtesting, Paper Trading, and Data Visualizations while QuantConnect specializes in Quant, Backtesting, and Paper Trading. They overlap in 2 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both FX Replay and QuantConnect offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

QuantConnect provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. FX Replay doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose FX Replay if you need Manual backtesting & bar replay with 1‑minute data across assets; seconds timeframes available for some FX and futures symbols., and Data sources: Dukascopy & OANDA for FX; CME for futures.. Go with QuantConnect if Seamless environment that connects research, backtests, and live trading on institutional-grade co-located servers., and Powered by the open-source LEAN engine (Python 3.11 and C#), with the flexibility to run locally or in the cloud. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Currencies, Futures, and Cryptos. FX Replay also includes Commodities. QuantConnect adds coverage for Stocks, ETFs, and Options.

QuantConnect offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. FX Replay uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

QuantConnect supports data exports to CSV, JSON, and PDF. FX Replay has more limited export options.

QuantConnect connects with brokers for portfolio syncing. FX Replay requires manual portfolio entry or data import.