★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Stock Profile

United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) Moat Analysis

United Parcel Service, Inc.

UPS · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$81.8B
SectorIndustrials
IndustryIntegrated Freight & Logistics
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
86/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

UPS operates an integrated air-and-ground delivery network across more than 200 countries and territories. Q1 2026 U.S. Domestic, International and Supply Chain Solutions revenue shares were 66.6%, 21.4% and 12.0%, while profit shares were 40.6%, 43.2% and 16.2%. The core moat is physical route and hub density, scale and specialized international and healthcare-logistics nodes—not generic brand claims or standardized shipping integrations. Amazon volume reduction and the Ground Saver/USPS transition are weakening domestic fixed-cost absorption; International volume also declined despite higher yield. Multi-carrier software, regional networks, DHL, FedEx and customer insourcing constrain pricing and switching costs.

Primary segment

U.S. Domestic Package

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

29.7% (reported)

HHI: 2,320

Coverage

3 segments · 6 tags

Updated 2026-07-12

Segments

U.S. Domestic Package

U.S. small parcel and time-definite package delivery

Revenue

66.6%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

29.7% (reported)

Peers

FDXAMZN

International Package

International express and deferred small parcel delivery

Revenue

21.4%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

FDXDHL.DE

Supply Chain Solutions

Freight forwarding, healthcare logistics, contract logistics, returns and related supply-chain services

Revenue

12%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

CHRWDHL.DEDSV.COEXPD+1

Moat Claims

U.S. Domestic Package

U.S. small parcel and time-definite package delivery

Q1 2026 revenue share is U.S. Domestic Package $14.125B of $21.202B consolidated revenue. Operating profit share is $515m of $1.267B consolidated segment operating profit. Operating margin fell to 3.6% amid Ground Saver/USPS transition costs, excess staffing and lower volume; UPS had targeted a 50% reduction in Amazon volume from 2024 levels by June 2026. Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026031154/ups-20260331.htm

Oligopoly

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Nationwide pickup-and-delivery density and integrated air/ground network support high service levels and route efficiency in the U.S.

Physical Network Density moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Amazon Logistics and regional carriers expanding last-mile density
  • USPS expanding last-mile partnerships and offerings
  • Volume declines reduce network utilization and density advantages

Leading indicators

  • U.S. average daily volume and stop density
  • On-time performance metrics
  • Cost per piece / margin trend in U.S. Domestic

Counterarguments

  • Shippers increasingly multi-source across UPS/FedEx/USPS/Amazon and regional carriers
  • E-commerce networks (notably Amazon) are building comparable last-mile density in key metros

Scale Economies Unit Cost

Supply

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 3 of 5

High throughput spreads fixed network costs (hubs, fleet, tech), but planned Amazon volume reductions and Ground Saver transition costs are currently testing fixed-cost absorption.

Scale Economies Unit Cost moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Loss of large-customer volume reduces fixed-cost absorption
  • Higher labor costs can offset scale benefits
  • Automation capex may not yield expected cost reductions

Leading indicators

  • Average daily volume and revenue per piece
  • Network utilization and sort capacity metrics
  • Mix shift toward lower-yield products (e.g., economy/returns)

Counterarguments

  • Large customers can insource or rebid volumes, limiting long-term scale advantages
  • USPS and alternative carriers can underprice on low-value residential deliveries

Benchmark Pricing Power

Financial

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 3 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Published rate cards and accessorial fees enable periodic price increases, though large shippers negotiate aggressively.

Benchmark Pricing Power moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Competitive pricing pressure in B2C and economy products
  • Large-customer contract repricing lowers net yields

Leading indicators

  • Average revenue per piece and yield
  • Discount rate trends and accessorial revenue
  • Churn among top 25 customers

Counterarguments

  • Rate increases are often matched by peers and offset by higher discounts
  • E-commerce shippers can shift volume to the cheapest service that meets SLA

International Package

International express and deferred small parcel delivery

Q1 2026 revenue share is International Package $4.540B of $21.202B consolidated revenue. Operating profit share is $547m of $1.267B consolidated segment operating profit. Revenue per piece rose 10.7%, but volume fell 6.0% and operating margin declined to 12.0%. Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026031154/ups-20260331.htm

Oligopoly

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 3 of 5

Global air hub-and-spoke infrastructure and international delivery footprint support time-definite cross-border service levels.

Service Field Network moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Trade policy, tariffs, and customs/regulatory changes
  • Macro downturn reduces premium international volumes
  • Competitive intensity from DHL and other integrators

Leading indicators

  • International export volume growth by lane
  • International average revenue per piece
  • On-time performance on key lanes

Counterarguments

  • DHL has comparable or stronger network density in parts of Europe and other regions
  • Postal operators and regional integrators can undercut on deferred services

Supply Chain Solutions

Freight forwarding, healthcare logistics, contract logistics, returns and related supply-chain services

Q1 2026 revenue share is SCS $2.537B of $21.202B consolidated revenue. Operating profit share is $205m of $1.267B consolidated segment operating profit. Revenue fell 6.5%, but operating margin improved to 8.1% as healthcare logistics and digital businesses partly offset forwarding and logistics weakness. Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026031154/ups-20260331.htm

Competitive

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 3 of 5

Global distribution and returns footprint plus proximity to UPS transportation hubs support rapid fulfillment and reverse logistics.

Service Field Network moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Warehouse and fulfillment space is replicable (capex + leases)
  • Digital returns and same-day services face new entrants

Leading indicators

  • Capacity utilization in logistics facilities
  • Returns volume growth and processing times
  • Customer concentration in key verticals (e.g., healthcare)

Counterarguments

  • Contract logistics is crowded; customers can switch providers at renewal
  • Large retailers can build in-house fulfillment and returns networks

Evidence

sec_filing

We deliver approximately 15 million ground packages per day

Ground package volume and stop density underpin network advantages in domestic parcel delivery.

sec_filing

Our ground fleet serves substantially all business and residential zip codes in the contiguous U.S.

Broad last-mile coverage supports dense routing and service consistency.

sec_filing

single pickup and delivery network

Single-network design supports operational and capital efficiencies that scale with volume.

sec_filing

targeted reduction of 50% by June 2026 from 2024 levels

Large-customer volume shifts can weaken fixed-cost absorption and density economics.

sec_filing

Cost per piece increased 9.7% during the first quarter of 2026

Current-quarter cost inflation shows near-term pressure on domestic scale economies.

Showing 5 of 14 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Amazon Logistics and regional carriers expanding last-mile density
  • USPS expanding last-mile partnerships and offerings
  • Volume declines reduce network utilization and density advantages
  • Labor cost inflation and operational disruption (e.g., labor actions)
  • Loss of large-customer volume reduces fixed-cost absorption
  • Higher labor costs can offset scale benefits

Leading indicators

  • U.S. average daily volume and stop density
  • On-time performance metrics
  • Cost per piece / margin trend in U.S. Domestic
  • Carrier volume/revenue share trends (ShipMatrix / Pitney Bowes)
  • Average daily volume and revenue per piece
  • Network utilization and sort capacity metrics

Keep the research going

Created 2025-12-22
Updated 2026-07-12

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.