UNDERVALUED STOCKS
VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
Updated June 2026 · Top 500 undervalued stocks
Best Undervalued Stocks 2026, Ranked by Value
Undervalued stocks ranked by valuation, quality, earnings quality, financial strength, and conservative investment.
This undervalued stock screener starts from the Liquid North Atlantic universe, then applies a custom value ranking system with quality and balance-sheet controls. The simulated strategy uses market-cap dynamic weights, a 500-stock target, and 26-week rebalances against Russell 1000 Value (IWD:USA).
For research and educational purposes only · Not financial advice
Undervalued Stocks Ranked by Value
Top 500 stocks in the ranking
As of 2026-06-16
| Rank | Ticker | Flag | Company | MCap | Value | Quality | Earn Qual | Strength | Invest | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | CRCT | Cricut, Inc. | $959M | 95.4 | 95.4 | 94.4 | 98.8 | 94.0 | 99.99 | |
| 02 | NRDS | NerdWallet, Inc. | $568M | 99.5 | 85.1 | 92.5 | 95.2 | 86.6 | 99.97 | |
| 03 | G5EN | G5 Entertainment AB | $56M | 99.5 | 77.9 | 98.7 | 97.3 | 87.5 | 99.96 | |
| 04 | SOFAF | Socfinaf SA | $497M | 96.3 | 95.8 | 96.3 | 86.3 | 70.5 | 99.95 | |
| 05 | CEK | CeoTronics AG | $93M | 94.3 | 90.1 | 98.7 | 82.5 | 96.0 | 99.93 | |
| 06 | ACSO | accesso Technology Group Plc | $141M | 98.2 | 84.6 | 84.2 | 93.8 | 93.5 | 99.92 | |
| 07 | DR | Medical Facilities Corp. | $232M | 96.7 | 94.0 | 78.8 | 82.5 | 86.8 | 99.91 | |
| 08 | HUG | Huuuge, Inc. | $237M | 99.7 | 93.0 | 57.8 | 95.8 | 95.3 | 99.89 | |
| 09 | PKN | ORLEN SA | $44B | 97.2 | 91.2 | 89.1 | 86.7 | 42.7 | 99.88 | |
| 10 | FRO | FERRO SA | $184M | 99.3 | 78.9 | 87.5 | 81.9 | 83.7 | 99.86 | |
| 11 | SIP | SIPEF SA | $1.1B | 89.9 | 97.8 | 78.5 | 98.2 | 87.8 | 99.85 | |
| 12 | TFI | Télévision Française 1 SA | $1.7B | 99.6 | 78.8 | 81.6 | 87.0 | 79.4 | 99.84 | |
| 13 | TEN | Ten Square Games SA | $164M | 98.0 | 89.2 | 65.5 | 93.1 | 88.1 | 99.82 | |
| 14 | FVRR | Fiverr International Ltd. | $364M | 99.4 | 70.9 | 84.2 | 89.0 | 97.6 | 99.81 | |
| 15 | ETL | Eurotel SA | $27M | 98.4 | 71.0 | 99.8 | 92.8 | 47.2 | 99.80 | |
| 16 | TUPRS.E | Turkiye Petrol Rafinerileri AS | $9.4B | 99.1 | 95.2 | 82.8 | 83.8 | 11.4 | 99.78 | |
| 17 | ASCN | Ascom Holding AG | $285M | 96.2 | 88.5 | 85.0 | 96.1 | 36.0 | 99.77 | |
| 18 | BWLP | BW LPG Ltd. | $2.9B | 97.5 | 97.4 | 70.7 | 74.7 | 72.2 | 99.76 | |
| 19 | ARASE.E | Dogu Aras Enerji Yatirimlari AS | $623M | 94.9 | 93.5 | 87.7 | 92.9 | 20.9 | 99.74 | |
| 20 | WTN | Wittchen SA | $67M | 92.4 | 88.8 | 98.2 | 73.0 | 72.6 | 99.73 |
Bucket Distribution
Universe-adjusted annualized return by rank bucket. The zero line is the average return across the ranked universe.
Universe
7.6%
Benchmark
+0.9%
Top
+4.8%
Value vs Quality
Each flag is a ranked stock at its listing country. Larger flags rank higher overall; the dashed lines mark the group averages.
Backtested Strategy
Current Holdings
| Ticker | Flag | Company | Weight | Gain/Loss | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | Meta Platforms, Inc. | 22.20% | +107.58% | 68.36 | |
| VZ | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 2.86% | -3.25% | 83.99 | |
| TTE | TotalEnergies SE | 2.74% | +49.23% | 85.58 | |
| RIO | Rio Tinto Plc | 2.63% | +71.57% | 69.35 | |
| T | AT&T, Inc. | 2.44% | -20.94% | 89.15 | |
| CVS | CVS Health Corp. | 1.84% | +41.17% | 71.24 | |
| SAN | Sanofi | 1.56% | -9.97% | 98.32 | |
| ACN | Accenture PLC | 1.50% | -5.98% | 95.55 | |
| MCK | McKesson Corp. | 1.44% | +171.35% | 65.89 | |
| HCA | HCA Healthcare, Inc. | 1.35% | +151.80% | 89.68 | |
| CNQ | Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. | 1.30% | +136.29% | 61.92 | |
| CMCSA | Comcast Corp. | 1.25% | -17.73% | 99.39 | |
| EQNR | Equinor ASA | 1.22% | +47.27% | 93.59 | |
| FDX | FedEx Corp. | 1.14% | +70.74% | 80.95 | |
| VLO | Valero Energy Corp. | 1.09% | +261.94% | 86.60 | |
| MPC | Marathon Petroleum Corp. | 1.08% | +70.76% | 80.20 | |
| ABX | Barrick Mining Corp. | 1.05% | +87.38% | 95.56 | |
| MFC | Manulife Financial Corp. | 1.00% | +99.15% | 80.30 | |
| DHL | Deutsche Post AG | 0.99% | +45.63% | 91.71 | |
| SU | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 0.98% | +83.02% | 89.32 |
Growth of $100,000.00
01/2006 - 06/2026
- Annualized Return
- 10.44% vs 8.77% benchmark
- Sharpe Ratio
- 0.61 vs 0.50 benchmark
- Sortino Ratio
- 0.81 vs 0.65 benchmark
- Max Drawdown
- -49.75% vs -60.10% benchmark
- Alpha
- 2.23% vs IWD benchmark
- Beta
- 0.94 vs IWD benchmark
General Info
- Period
- 2006-01-01 - 2026-06-17
- Benchmark
- Russell 1000 Value (IWD:USA)
- Universe
- Liquid North Atlantic
- Number of Positions
- 500
- Rebalance Frequency
- Every 26 Weeks
- Annual Turnover
- 15.25%(~76 trades/yr)
- Overall Winners
- (1,406/2,409) 58.36%
- Correlation to Benchmark
- 0.93
Performance by Calendar Year
* from 01/02/06·** to 06/16/26
Advanced Metrics
- Information Ratio
- 0.15 active-return efficiency
- Calmar Ratio
- 0.21 return vs drawdown
- Volatility
- 15.73% vs 15.61% benchmark
- Ulcer Index
- 10.55% vs 14.69% benchmark
Recent Trades
As of 2026-06-17
The most recent simulated buys and sells from the latest rebalances.
★ Members Only ★
See the latest trades
The simulated buys and sells from the latest rebalances are free for members. Log in or create a free account to unlock them.
- Currency
- USD
- Sizing
- Dynamic weight
- Weight Formula
- MktCap
- Positions
- 500
- Reconstitution
- Every 26 weeks
- Rebalance
- Every 26 weeks
Universe
This ranking uses the Liquid North Atlantic universe, so the list starts from liquid North American and Atlantic-market stocks that are easier to trade than thin or restricted names.
Position Sizing
The portfolio targets 500 positions with dynamic market-cap weights. The result is closer to a custom value index than a concentrated stock-picking portfolio.
Buying and Selling
The strategy buys stocks with rank 90 or higher, market cap above $500 million, and price above $5. It sells once a holding falls below rank 60 or the price drops below $3, and it does not allow immediate buyback.
Trading Costs
Trades fill at the next bar's average price, with $0.005 per share commission, variable slippage, and no management fee. The strategy reconstitutes and rebalances every 26 weeks against the Russell 1000 Value benchmark.
About these models
These are illustrative backtests, not portfolios to copy. They show how a hypothetical strategy built on the ranking might have behaved after rebalancing rules, trading costs, timing, and position sizing are layered on top. Results are not actual trading returns, not investment advice, and do not guarantee future performance. We validate that each ranking can sort stocks within its universe in a historically useful way, but a good ranking can still lead to better or worse outcomes once it becomes a tradable model.
Each stock is scored 0 to 100 across valuation, quality at a reasonable price, earnings quality, financial strength, and conservative investment. Higher block scores are better, and the final score is their weighted blend.
Ranking System
Every stock in the universe is scored 0 to 100 across five composites: multi-measure valuation, quality at a reasonable price, earnings quality, financial strength, and conservative investment. The weighted total drives the final rank.
Multi Measure Valuation50% weight
How cheap the company looks across earnings and cash-flow yields, asset and sales multiples, shareholder yield, and dividend yield.
- Earnings Yield
- Free Cash Flow Yield
- EBITDA Yield
- Operating Income Yield
Quality At A Reasonable Price20% weight
Whether valuation is paired with durable profitability and fundamental strength instead of pure cheapness.
- 5Y Return on Investment
- TTM Return on Investment
- 5Y Gross Margin
- 5Y Operating Margin
Earnings Quality15% weight
Whether reported earnings are supported by cash flow and lower accrual/manipulation-risk signals.
- Accruals to Assets
- Operating Cash Flow to Net Income
- Beneish M-Score
Financial Strength10% weight
Whether the company has lower leverage, better interest coverage, and stronger distress-avoidance scores.
- Debt to Capital
- Debt to Assets
- Interest Coverage
- Altman Z Non-Manufacturing
Conservative Investment5% weight
Prefers companies with lower total asset growth to avoid aggressive balance-sheet expansion.
- Total Asset Growth
Undervalued Stocks FAQ
What are the best undervalued stocks right now?
The ranking highlights undervalued stocks from the latest published strategy snapshot. Treat it as a research shortlist, not a buy list.
How does this undervalued stock screener work?
Each stock receives a 0 to 100 score across multi-measure valuation, quality at a reasonable price, earnings quality, financial strength, and conservative investment. The final rank blends those blocks into one value score.
Are low P/E stocks always undervalued?
No. A low P/E can signal cheapness, but it can also reflect falling earnings, financial stress, cyclicality, or a weak business. This model uses several valuation measures, then adds profitability, earnings-quality, leverage, and investment-discipline checks.
Are these undervalued stocks to buy?
No. This page is for research and education only. Use the ranking as a starting point for deeper due diligence, risk review, position sizing, and your own investment process.
How often is the undervalued stocks ranking updated?
The simulated strategy reconstitutes and rebalances every 26 weeks. Check the as-of date above the table to see how current the listed stocks are.
How is this different from the Russell 1000 Value benchmark?
The simulated strategy follows a value-index-like construction with dynamic market-cap weights, but it starts from the broader Liquid North Atlantic universe, uses Find My Moat's custom undervalued-stocks ranking system, and follows a semiannual rebalance schedule.
More Rankings & Systems
Quality Stocks
A broad quality ranking focused on profitability, margins, free cash flow quality, durability, solvency, and accounting quality.
Defensive resilienceDefensive Stocks
A ranking focused on stable fundamentals, lower downside risk, cash flow quality, and balance sheet resilience.
Feedback
Spot something confusing, stale, or worth improving? Send feedback on the ranking, strategy assumptions, holdings table, or explanation.
Research & Backtest Disclaimer
These rankings are research shortlists, not investment advice, personalized recommendations, or offers to buy or sell securities. They do not account for your objectives, risk tolerance, taxes, time horizon, portfolio, or personal financial situation.
Backtests and simulations are historical models, not live results or guarantees of future performance. Data, assumptions, transaction costs, liquidity, turnover, taxes, and implementation can materially change actual outcomes. Verify current company data and do your own due diligence before making any investment decision.