★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Stock Profile

Keyence Corporation (6861) Moat Analysis

Keyence Corporation

6861 · Tokyo Stock Exchange Prime Market

Market cap (USD)$130.8B
SectorTechnology
IndustryConsumer Electronics
CountryJP
Data as of
Moat score
75/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Keyence Corporation is active on the Tokyo Stock Exchange Prime Market under code 6861; the record now uses the exchange ticker rather than the vendor quote symbol 6861.T. It reports one electronic-application-equipment operating segment, so the former unsupported product-line pseudo-segments were consolidated. FY2026 sales were JPY 1,169.289bn and operating income JPY 595.759bn; Q1 FY2026 sales rose 32.8% and operating income rose 44.7%, with 70.4% of sales outside Japan and substantial reported currency benefit. The retained moat is the consultative direct-sales and field-information cycle applied across roughly 400,000 customers in about 110 countries, moderated from strength 5 to 4 because retention, win rates, salesforce size, and peer coverage are undisclosed. High margins, product novelty, fabless sourcing, same-day shipping, and the CADENAS acquisition are not treated as separate moats without comparative or causal economics; CADENAS had no separate disclosed contribution. No customer exceeded 10% of FY2026 sales, while numeric supplier concentration was not disclosed. At June 20, 2026, 243,207,684 shares were issued, 682,599 were treasury shares, and 242,525,085 were outstanding. No defensible market-share or HHI estimate was available.

Primary segment

Electronic Application Equipment

Market structure

Competitive

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

1 segments · 6 tags

Updated 2026-08-08

Segments

Electronic Application Equipment

Factory-automation, industrial inspection, identification, and measurement equipment

Revenue

100%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

6645.T6273.TCGNXZBRA+4

Moat Claims

Electronic Application Equipment

Factory-automation, industrial inspection, identification, and measurement equipment

Keyence reports one operating segment and omits product/service detail because one product group exceeds 90% of consolidated sales. Revenue and operating-profit shares therefore equal 1 rather than unsupported allocations across product categories. FY2026 sales were JPY 1,169,289m and operating income JPY 595,759m. Q1 FY2026 (March 21-June 20, 2026) sales were JPY 346,621m, up 32.8%, and operating income was JPY 187,076m, up 44.7%; Japan was 29.6% of sales and overseas 70.4%. No definition-matched market share, complete competitor shares, HHI, product-line economics, retention, qualification duration, or numeric supplier concentration was disclosed. No customer exceeded 10% of FY2026 or FY2025 sales. CADENAS was consolidated during FY2026, but separate economics, platform monetization, and retention were not disclosed. Sources: https://www.keyence.co.jp/pdf/AnnualReport_2026_en.pdf, https://www.keyence.co.jp/pdf/FinancialResults_202607_en.pdf, and https://www.keyence.co.jp/pdf/PressRelease_20250520.pdf.

Competitive

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 3 of 5

A global consultative direct-sales organization captures factory-floor problems, proposes applications, and feeds primary information into reusable product planning. Its customer reach and trained field coverage are costly to replicate, but absent retention, win-rate, salesforce-size, and peer-coverage data do not support the former maximum score.

Service Field Network moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Competitors expand application-engineering coverage in major industrial clusters
  • Sales-engineer hiring, training, or retention fails to keep pace with overseas growth
  • Remote selection tools and simpler products reduce the value of field consultation

Leading indicators

  • Salesforce size, training investment, and revenue per employee
  • Customer count, repeat-order or retention disclosures
  • Overseas local-currency sales growth and field-office coverage

Counterarguments

  • Direct sales can be replicated by well-funded automation competitors
  • The disclosed customer count is reach, not proof of retention or switching costs

Evidence

other

Our sales engineers, who are well-versed in product characteristics, propose optimal applications for the customer's site

Direct evidence of the consultative application-engineering mechanism rather than a generic salesforce claim.

other

This information is then fed back into product planning, leading to the development of even higher value-add products

States the causal feedback loop from territory-level customer contact to general-purpose product development; comparative outcomes remain undisclosed.

other

KEYENCE serves around 400,000 customers in some 110 countries around the world

Current annual-report context establishes the breadth over which the field-information model operates; the figure is customer reach, not retention.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Competitors expand application-engineering coverage in major industrial clusters
  • Sales-engineer hiring, training, or retention fails to keep pace with overseas growth
  • Remote selection tools and simpler products reduce the value of field consultation
  • Cyclical factory-capex weakness reduces customer problem-solving activity and orders

Leading indicators

  • Salesforce size, training investment, and revenue per employee
  • Customer count, repeat-order or retention disclosures
  • Overseas local-currency sales growth and field-office coverage
  • New-product mix and evidence that customer insights produce differentiated launches

Keep the research going

Created 2026-01-02
Updated 2026-08-08

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.