AUM 13F vs BamSEC comparison

Both platforms cover 13F, Insider Data, Improved Filings, Watchlist, and Alerts workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Both AUM 13F and BamSEC keep freemium access with optional paid upgrades, so you can trial each platform before committing.

Both AUM 13F and BamSEC prioritize web or desktop access. Investors wanting a mobile-first workflow may need to rely on responsive web views.

AUM 13F differentiates itself with Analyze asset managers using public filings and drill into EDGAR, IAPD, and CAFR source data., Filter/browse by fund type (Private Equity, Hedge Fund, Real Estate) plus tags, location, and AUM size., and Firm pages aggregate AUM history, AUM breakdowns, and Form 13F holdings (with sector views) and link to EDGAR filings (e.g., 13F-HR, SC 13G, Forms D/3/4)., whereas BamSEC stands out for Specialized web platform for working with SEC filings and earnings transcripts, marketed as making “financial research easier” for thousands of subscribers including major investment banks and buy-side firms., Covers all SEC filings submitted electronically via EDGAR from 1994 onward in their original, unmodified form, with new filings typically processed within a minute or two of being filed (and by end of day for confidential filings that later become public). Browsing filings does not require a subscription, but premium features are limited to active subscribers., and All-company screening tools let you instantly search across millions of documents for any term, using filters like industry, market cap, document type and Watch List, plus advanced operators (exact phrases, boolean logic, proximity / distance between words) and email alerts for new matches..