AUM 13F vs CapEdge comparison

Both platforms cover 13F, 13D/13G, Insider Data, Improved Filings, Alerts, and Data Visualizations workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Both AUM 13F and CapEdge keep freemium access with optional paid upgrades, so you can trial each platform before committing.

CapEdge ships a dedicated mobile experience, while AUM 13F focuses on web or desktop access.

AUM 13F differentiates itself with Analyze asset managers using public filings and drill into EDGAR, IAPD, and CAFR source data., Filter/browse by fund type (Private Equity, Hedge Fund, Real Estate) plus tags, location, and AUM size., and Firm pages aggregate AUM history, AUM breakdowns, and Form 13F holdings (with sector views) and link to EDGAR filings (e.g., 13F-HR, SC 13G, Forms D/3/4)., whereas CapEdge stands out for Web-based research platform focused on US equity capital markets that lets users instantly search SEC EDGAR filings and earnings transcripts, monitor IPOs, and track investor holdings across time; navigation exposes Earnings, IPOs, Transcripts, Investor Holdings and an EDGAR Filing Screener from the homepage., Advanced EDGAR filing search supports natural-language and keyword queries, filters by ticker, company name, filing type, and date, plus Filing Analysis views that show which companies mention a theme and how its popularity changes over time. Power users can use AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, with search history saved for later reuse., and Improved filing reader for most SEC forms (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, 6-K, S-1, F-1, S-4, 20-F, 40-F, DEF 14A, etc.) including similar-filing navigation, customizable font and size, side table-of-contents, and advanced content analysis such as sentiment scores, readability measures, and lists of new and removed words across successive filings..