AUM 13F vs Quiver Quantitative comparison

AUM 13F focuses on 13F, 13D/13G, and Insider Data while Quiver Quantitative specializes in Screeners, Watchlist, and Backtesting. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both AUM 13F and Quiver Quantitative offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Quiver Quantitative is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

Quiver Quantitative has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. AUM 13F is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Quiver Quantitative provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. AUM 13F doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose AUM 13F if you need Analyze asset managers using public filings and drill into EDGAR, IAPD, and CAFR source data., and Filter/browse by fund type (Private Equity, Hedge Fund, Real Estate) plus tags, location, and AUM size.. Go with Quiver Quantitative if Alternative data dashboards spanning Congress trading, insider activity, government contracts, lobbying, app ratings, Google Trends, U.S. patents, ETF and institutional holdings, and more., and Congress Trading dashboard parses public disclosures, tracks post-trade performance, and shows cumulative returns by individual politicians. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. AUM 13F also includes Hedge Funds, Private Funds, Real Estate, and Funds.

Quiver Quantitative includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. AUM 13F focuses on other analytical tools.