AUM 13F vs SEC.gov (EDGAR) comparison

AUM 13F focuses on 13F, 13D/13G, and Insider Data while SEC.gov (EDGAR) specializes in Improved Filings, Insider Data, and 13F. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both AUM 13F and SEC.gov (EDGAR) offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

SEC.gov (EDGAR) is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

SEC.gov (EDGAR) provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. AUM 13F doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose AUM 13F if you need Analyze asset managers using public filings and drill into EDGAR, IAPD, and CAFR source data., and Filter/browse by fund type (Private Equity, Hedge Fund, Real Estate) plus tags, location, and AUM size.. Go with SEC.gov (EDGAR) if Search Filings provides free public access to EDGAR documents and search tools (e.g., Full Text Search, Latest Filings, Mutual Fund Search)., and EDGAR Full-Text Search covers electronic filings since 2001 (including exhibits/attachments) and supports queries by keyword, ticker, company name, CIK, and reporter; boolean/wildcards and advanced search are supported (natural-language search is not). better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, ETFs, and Funds. AUM 13F also includes Hedge Funds, Private Funds, and Real Estate. SEC.gov (EDGAR) adds coverage for Mutual Funds.

SEC.gov (EDGAR) offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. AUM 13F uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.