★ BEST INVESTING TOOLS COMPARISON ★
VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
Tool comparison edition
Tool Comparison
AUM 13F vs SentiSense
Pick AUM 13F instead if
AUM 13F
Free • From $29/mo · Web
- You care about improved filings, something SentiSense doesn't offer
Start here
SentiSense
Free • From $15/mo · Web · API
- You want the cheaper way in: plans start at $15/mo instead of $29/mo
- Delayed quotes won't cut it; you need real-time data
- You want an API so you can script or automate things
Skip both if: Neither one clicks with how you research; there are strong third options.
See alternativesOutbound links may include affiliate or sponsor codes.
Our take
The bottom line
AUM 13F and SentiSense cover a lot of the same ground (5 shared categories, including institutional ownership, insider data, and watchlist), so for the basics you won't go far wrong with either. SentiSense simply does more: 22 categories to AUM 13F's 6, including stock ideas, screeners, and quant. AUM 13F counters by keeping things simpler.
What readers say
AUM 13F
Vote once to reveal the community verdict.
SentiSense
Vote once to reveal the community verdict.
Key differences at a glance
- Cheaper paid plan
- SentiSense$15/mo vs $29/mo
- Broader coverage
- SentiSense22 vs 6 categories
- API access
- SentiSense
- Real-time data
- SentiSense
- Free plan
- Both
See for yourself
How they stack up
The side-by-side table: pricing, platforms, data, and coverage at a glance.ShowHide
How they stack up
The side-by-side table: pricing, platforms, data, and coverage at a glance.| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing & plans | ||
Starting price | Free • From $29/mo | Free • From $15/mo |
Free tier | Yes | Yes |
Free trial | — | — |
Plan limits | Free: daily views: Limited (not disclosed) | 16 limits: Free: api requests per month: 1,000, Free: rate limit per min: 30 +14 more |
| Platforms & access | ||
Web app | Yes | Yes |
Mobile app | No | No |
API access | No | Yes |
Broker sync | — | No |
Integrations | — | SentiSense REST API, SentiSense Python SDK +9 more |
| Audience & fit | ||
Experience level | Intermediate, Advanced | Intermediate, Advanced |
Best for | Institutional Investors and Analysts | Retail Traders, Pro Retail +7 more |
Categories covered | 6 | 22 |
Regions | — | North America |
| Data & capabilities | ||
Data quality | — | Latency: Real-time and 15-min Delayed and Pricing: Vendor |
Data partners | — | 6 partners: TradingView, Polygon.io +4 more |
Capabilities | — | Universe builder and AI summaries: News |
Security | — | 3 signals: Data residency: US, Encryption at rest +1 more |
| Try it | Visit AUM 13F | Visit SentiSense |
Where each one shines
What AUM 13F and SentiSense each do best.ShowHide
Where each one shines
What AUM 13F and SentiSense each do best.What AUM 13F does best
- Research asset managers using public filing sources such as EDGAR, IAPD, and CAFR-linked records.
- Browse large-manager AUM rankings, firm profiles, AUM history, AUM breakdowns, and manager-level holdings context.
- Filter managers by fund type, tags, location, AUM size, and related public-filing attributes.
- Open firm pages that combine AUM data, Form 13F holdings, sector views, and links to underlying filing documents.
- Use the latest EDGAR filings feed with filing-type filters for 13F, Form D, 8-K, 10-Q, 10-K, insider forms, and other disclosures.
What SentiSense does best
- Use the web app and REST API to combine market data, social sentiment, news clustering, institutional flow, insider trading, congressional trading, and AI analysis.
- Track SentiSense Score, a per-ticker sentiment signal blending news, Reddit, and X/Twitter context for stock discovery and crowd-conviction monitoring.
- Use Documents & News APIs for sentiment metrics across news articles, social posts, and AI-curated stories, subject to source-content restrictions.
- Review AI-curated story clusters with generated titles, sentiment, ticker badges, source aggregation, and impact scores.
- Use Market Mood as a 0-100 fear/greed-style index built from internal signals with historical views.
Every detail we compared
Every tracked attribute for AUM 13F and SentiSense, side by side.ShowHide
Every detail we compared
Every tracked attribute for AUM 13F and SentiSense, side by side.| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Coverage & fit | ||
Asset types | StocksETFsHedge FundsPrivate FundsReal EstateFunds | StocksETFsBondsOptions |
Experience | IntermediateAdvanced | IntermediateAdvanced |
Target audience | Institutional InvestorsAnalysts | Retail TradersPro RetailDay TradersSwing TradersAlgo TradersAnalystsQuants/DevelopersHedge Funds+1 more |
Regions | Not specified | North America |
Coverage details | Identifiers: CIK, CUSIP, and Ticker | Countries: USIdentifiers: Ticker and CIK |
| Data | ||
Data freshness | Not specified | Real-time15-min Delayed |
Pricing sources | Not specified | Vendor |
Data partners | Not specified | TradingViewPolygon.ioSEC EDGARFINRACongressional STOCK Act disclosuresNews, Reddit, X/Twitter, Substack, Discord, and public social sources |
| Access & integrations | ||
API protocols | Not specified | REST |
API auth & delivery | Not specified | Auth: APIKeySDKs: Python and TSDocs |
Import methods | Not specified | Manual |
Integrations | Not specified | SentiSense REST APISentiSense Python SDKSentiSense JavaScript/TypeScript SDKSentiSense GitHub SDK repositoriesAI Agent SkillClaude CodeCodexOpenClaw+3 more |
Export formats | Not specified | JSON |
| Plans & trust | ||
Security & compliance | Not specified | Data residency: USEncryption at restEncryption in transit |
Capability signals | Not specified | Universe builderAI summaries: News |
Vendor & support | Chen Software LLCSupport: Email | Compass AI Data Services, LLCSupport: Email |
Green tags are exclusive to that tool in this comparison.
What you'll actually pay
Plans, billing, trials, and per-month pricing for both tools.ShowHide
What you'll actually pay
Plans, billing, trials, and per-month pricing for both tools.| Tier | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Freedaily views: Limited (not disclosed) | Freeapi requests per month: 1,000 · rate limit per min: 30 · +6 more |
| Entry paid plan | $29/mo“Subscription” | $15/mo“PRO”api requests per month: 100,000 · rate limit per min: 200 · +6 more |
Questions we keep getting
What's the difference between AUM 13F and SentiSense?
AUM 13F leans toward institutional ownership, insider data, and improved filings, while SentiSense puts more weight on stock ideas, screeners, and data visualizations. They overlap in 5 categories, so for most people it comes down to workflow preference and price.
How much do AUM 13F and SentiSense cost?
Good news: both AUM 13F and SentiSense have free plans, so you can run them side by side and only pay if you hit a wall.
Does AUM 13F or SentiSense have an API?
SentiSense has an API for programmatic access and custom integrations. AUM 13F doesn't, so you're working through its interface.
Should I choose AUM 13F or SentiSense?
It depends on what you're after. Pick AUM 13F if improved filings matter to you; go with SentiSense if you'd rather have stock ideas and screeners. And if you only need the basics both share, let price decide.
What asset classes do AUM 13F and SentiSense cover?
Both cover stocks and ETFs. AUM 13F also handles hedge funds, private funds, and real estate. SentiSense adds bonds and options on top.
Does AUM 13F or SentiSense have real-time data?
SentiSense offers real-time data, which matters if you trade actively. AUM 13F runs on delayed or end-of-day data, which is perfectly fine for longer-term investors who don't live and die by the tick.
Is AUM 13F or SentiSense better for day trading?
SentiSense is the one positioned more for active traders. AUM 13F is the better fit if you care less about fast trading workflows and more about a calmer research process.
Which has a better stock screener: AUM 13F or SentiSense?
SentiSense has a stock screener for surfacing ideas; AUM 13F doesn't, and focuses its energy elsewhere.
Feedback
Spot stale pricing, missing features, or a comparison that feels off? Send feedback on the verdict, table, alternatives, or recommendation.
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.