ETF Research Center adds ETF Screeners, ETF Comparison, ETF Overview, ETF Fundamentals, ETF Valuation, ETF Factors, ETF Holdings, ETF Overlap, Which ETF includes this Stock?, Money Flow, and Watchlist coverage that okama skips.
VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
★ FINANCIAL TOOLS & SERVICES DIRECTORY ★
PRICE: 5 CENTS
Tuesday, October 28, 2025
Tool Comparison
ETF Research Center vs okama comparison
Compare pricing, supported platforms, categories, and standout capabilities to decide which tool fits your workflow.
Quick takeaways
okama includes Quant, Correlation, Risk Metrics (VaR/ES/Drawdown), Monte Carlo, Data APIs, Inflation Rates, and Interest Rates categories that ETF Research Center omits.
In depth comparison
ETF Research Center
etfrc.com
ETF Research Center, powered by AltaVista Research, offers deep ETF analytics. The free plan provides access to basic screeners and watchlists, while paid tiers unlock fundamentals and valuations, complete exportable holdings for many issuers, PDF tear sheets, portfolio builder features (2 portfolios on Individual vs. 40 on Professional), and customizable PDF portfolio reports. Paid plans start with a one-month free trial.
Categories
Platforms
Pricing
Quick highlights
- Equity Power Screener to filter ETFs by performance, technical indicators (beta, volatility, RSI), fundamentals, valuations, and ratings (advanced criteria gated to premium plans).
- Fund Finder with multi-tab views across general, equity, and fixed income metrics; many criteria reserved for Individual and Professional tiers.
- Fund Overlap tool showing pairwise overlap of holdings and top differences, plus a Portfolio Builder that generates overlap matrices against benchmarks.
- Stock Locator to find all ETFs holding a specific stock, showing weights and shares; the full list is available with a free account.
- Total Cost of Ownership comparison that factors in expense ratios, spreads, and commissions, adjustable for user-defined holding period and assumptions.
Community votes (overall)
okama
okama.io
Free open-source toolkit for portfolio analysis and market data. Okama offers web widgets, an API, and a Python library with efficient frontiers, risk metrics, and Monte Carlo simulations. Market and macro data is available end-of-day, with live prices delayed by ~15–20 minutes.
Categories
Platforms
Pricing
Quick highlights
- Interactive Efficient Frontier (mean–variance) widget for quick visualization.
- Compare-assets widget covering returns, drawdowns, CVaR, and correlations.
- Portfolio widget built on adjusted monthly data for risk/return analysis.
- Python library supports mean–variance optimization, rebalancing scenarios, backtesting, and advanced risk metrics such as VaR, CVaR, semideviation, and drawdowns.
- Monte Carlo simulations and wealth-index forecasts with percentile bands.
Community votes (overall)
Where they differ
ETF Research Center
Distinct strengths include:
- Equity Power Screener to filter ETFs by performance, technical indicators (beta, volatility, RSI), fundamentals, valuations, and ratings (advanced criteria gated to premium plans).
- Fund Finder with multi-tab views across general, equity, and fixed income metrics; many criteria reserved for Individual and Professional tiers.
- Fund Overlap tool showing pairwise overlap of holdings and top differences, plus a Portfolio Builder that generates overlap matrices against benchmarks.
- Stock Locator to find all ETFs holding a specific stock, showing weights and shares; the full list is available with a free account.
okama
Distinct strengths include:
- Interactive Efficient Frontier (mean–variance) widget for quick visualization.
- Compare-assets widget covering returns, drawdowns, CVaR, and correlations.
- Portfolio widget built on adjusted monthly data for risk/return analysis.
- Python library supports mean–variance optimization, rebalancing scenarios, backtesting, and advanced risk metrics such as VaR, CVaR, semideviation, and drawdowns.
Feature-by-feature breakdown
| Attribute | ETF Research Center | okama |
|---|---|---|
Categories Which research workflows each platform targets | Shared: ETF Performance, Portfolio, Backtesting, Data Visualizations Unique: ETF Screeners, ETF Comparison, ETF Overview, ETF Fundamentals, ETF Valuation, ETF Factors, ETF Holdings, ETF Overlap, Which ETF includes this Stock?, Money Flow, Watchlist | Shared: ETF Performance, Portfolio, Backtesting, Data Visualizations Unique: Quant, Correlation, Risk Metrics (VaR/ES/Drawdown), Monte Carlo, Data APIs, Inflation Rates, Interest Rates |
Asset types Supported asset classes and universes | ETFs | Stocks, ETFs, Commodities, Currencies, Mutual Funds |
Experience levels Who each product is built for | Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced | Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced |
Platforms Where you can access the product | Web | Web, API |
Pricing High-level pricing models | Free, Subscription | Free |
Key features Core capabilities called out by each vendor | Unique
| Unique
|
Tested Verified by hands-on testing inside Find My Moat | Yes | Yes |
Editor pick Featured inside curated shortlists | Standard listing | Standard listing |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which workflows do ETF Research Center and okama both support?
Both platforms cover ETF Performance, Portfolio, Backtesting, and Data Visualizations workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.
Do ETF Research Center and okama require subscriptions?
Both ETF Research Center and okama keep freemium access with optional paid upgrades, so you can trial each platform before committing.
How can you access ETF Research Center and okama?
Both ETF Research Center and okama prioritize web or desktop access. Investors wanting a mobile-first workflow may need to rely on responsive web views.
What unique strengths set the two platforms apart?
ETF Research Center differentiates itself with Equity Power Screener to filter ETFs by performance, technical indicators (beta, volatility, RSI), fundamentals, valuations, and ratings (advanced criteria gated to premium plans)., Fund Finder with multi-tab views across general, equity, and fixed income metrics; many criteria reserved for Individual and Professional tiers., and Fund Overlap tool showing pairwise overlap of holdings and top differences, plus a Portfolio Builder that generates overlap matrices against benchmarks., whereas okama stands out for Interactive Efficient Frontier (mean–variance) widget for quick visualization., Compare-assets widget covering returns, drawdowns, CVaR, and correlations., and Portfolio widget built on adjusted monthly data for risk/return analysis..
Keep exploring
Keep exploring
Stay on top of related tools
Browse the categories and profiles that overlap most with this comparison to round out your shortlist.
Related categories
Follow the same themes these tools compete in.
Recommended tools
These profiles share overlapping coverage with both sides of this matchup.
- YChartsHands-on review
Overlap: ETF Comparison, Data Visualizations, and Portfolio.
ETF ComparisonData VisualizationsPortfolio - ETF Action
Overlap: ETF Overview, ETF Performance, and ETF Holdings.
ETF OverviewETF PerformanceETF Holdings - MarketXLS
Overlap: Monte Carlo, Risk Metrics (VaR/ES/Drawdown), and Portfolio.
Monte CarloRisk Metrics (VaR/ES/Drawdown)Portfolio - KoyfinEditor's pickHands-on review
Overlap: ETF Screeners, Data Visualizations, and ETF Overview.
ETF ScreenersData VisualizationsETF Overview - Seeking AlphaEditor's pickHands-on review
Overlap: ETF Screeners, Data Visualizations, and Portfolio.
ETF ScreenersData VisualizationsPortfolio - ETF Database (ETFdb)Hands-on review
Overlap: ETF Screeners, ETF Comparison, and ETF Overview.
ETF ScreenersETF ComparisonETF Overview
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.