IBISWorld vs QuantRocket comparison

IBISWorld focuses on Data APIs, Scores, and AI Chat while QuantRocket specializes in Screeners, Quant, and Backtesting. They overlap in 1 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

QuantRocket offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while IBISWorld requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with QuantRocket and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose IBISWorld if you need Industry Research Reports (30–40 pages) across multiple countries, with PDF downloads and Key Statistics exportable to Excel., and Business Environment Profiles with proprietary forecasts across hundreds of economic indicators.. Go with QuantRocket if Includes survivorship-bias-free US minute-bar data (from 2007 onward) for Zipline backtests and live trading, with optional real-time feeds from brokers like IBKR and Alpaca., and Supports point-in-time screening and ranking pipelines, and integrates with Alphalens and Pyfolio for in-notebook analysis inside Jupyter. better fits how you invest.

Both cover common asset types. IBISWorld also includes Other. QuantRocket adds coverage for Stocks, ETFs, Futures, Currencies, and Options.

QuantRocket offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. IBISWorld uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (JSON). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

QuantRocket connects with brokers for portfolio syncing. IBISWorld requires manual portfolio entry or data import.

QuantRocket includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. IBISWorld focuses on other analytical tools.