MacroMicro vs Trackinsight comparison

MacroMicro focuses on Data Visualizations, ETF Screeners, and ETF Comparison while Trackinsight specializes in ETF Screeners, ETF Comparison, and ETF Overview. They overlap in 6 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both MacroMicro and Trackinsight offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose MacroMicro if you need Global macro and market database with more than 40 million data points across 100+ countries and coverage of 48+ asset fundamentals., and ETF toolkit includes a screener, comparator, and reverse lookup to see which ETFs include a given stock.. Go with Trackinsight if Web-based ETF analytics platform with a global ETF screener, ETF comparison tools, ETF provider views, personal lists/watchlists and ETF Portfolio Insights modules for ETF investors., and Global ETF screener covering a large universe of ETFs/ETPs (10k+ referenced in product copy) with filters for investment objectives, regions, themes, ESG characteristics and benchmarks. better fits how you invest.

Both cover ETFs. MacroMicro also includes Stocks, Bonds, Commodities, Currencies, and Cryptos.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (CSV). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

Both MacroMicro and Trackinsight include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Trackinsight offers portfolio tracking features. MacroMicro is more focused on research and analysis.