okama vs QuantRocket comparison

okama focuses on Quant, Data Visualizations, and Portfolio while QuantRocket specializes in Screeners, Quant, and Backtesting. They overlap in 3 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both okama and QuantRocket offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose okama if you need Interactive Efficient Frontier (mean–variance) widget for quick visualization., and Compare-assets widget covering returns, drawdowns, CVaR, and correlations.. Go with QuantRocket if Includes survivorship-bias-free US minute-bar data (from 2007 onward) for Zipline backtests and live trading, with optional real-time feeds from brokers like IBKR and Alpaca., and Supports point-in-time screening and ranking pipelines, and integrates with Alphalens and Pyfolio for in-notebook analysis inside Jupyter. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, ETFs, and Currencies. okama also includes Commodities, and Mutual Funds. QuantRocket adds coverage for Futures, and Options.

QuantRocket offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. okama uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

QuantRocket supports data exports to CSV, and JSON. okama has more limited export options.

QuantRocket connects with brokers for portfolio syncing. okama requires manual portfolio entry or data import.

QuantRocket includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. okama focuses on other analytical tools.

okama offers portfolio tracking features. QuantRocket is more focused on research and analysis.