StockFetcher vs TradingView comparison

StockFetcher focuses on Screeners, Watchlist, and Data Visualizations while TradingView specializes in Data Visualizations, Quant, and Screeners. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

TradingView offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while StockFetcher requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with TradingView and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

TradingView has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. StockFetcher is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Choose StockFetcher if you need Filter stocks using a plain-English, text-based query language built on 125+ technical indicators., and Two plan levels: Standard and Advanced. Standard includes up to 100 saved filters and watchlists; Advanced expands to 250 each, larger symbol lists, bigger CSV exports, and advanced filter support.. Go with TradingView if Markets covered include stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, bonds, FX, futures, and indices., and Supercharts with multi-chart layouts, custom intervals (incl. seconds and range bars), and more charts-per-tab on higher tiers (up to 16 on Ultimate). better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks. TradingView adds coverage for ETFs, Cryptos, Bonds, Currencies, and Futures.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (CSV). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

TradingView connects with brokers for portfolio syncing. StockFetcher requires manual portfolio entry or data import.

TradingView is built with active traders in mind, offering features like real-time data and technical analysis. StockFetcher is better suited for buy-and-hold investors focused on fundamentals.

Both StockFetcher and TradingView include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

TradingView offers portfolio tracking features. StockFetcher is more focused on research and analysis.