Free Alternatives to FactorsToday

Checking

Free replacement verdicts

FactorsToday logo

Free Alternatives to FactorsToday

Zero-cost replacements grouped by fit, tradeoffs, pricing friction, and platform access. Use this list to test FactorsToday before paying for another subscription.

Switching from FactorsToday doesn't have to cost a thing. We've curated 20 free-tier alternatives that cover similar workflows, from Data Visualizations to Screeners and beyond. Each pick below is framed by fit, caveats, and access friction so you can trial replacements without opening your wallet.

Disclosure: outbound links may include affiliate or sponsor links

Which Alternative Should You Use?

PortfoliosLab logo

PortfoliosLab

Closest replacement

Best for: Long-term investors who want portfolio backtests, risk metrics, correlations, optimization, and screeners in a single low-cost web workflow.

  • PortfoliosLab best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, strategy backtesting, and AI agent data access.
  • PortfoliosLab adds a free starting point that the base tool does not show. Free access caveat: signup required and Free plan includes 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations/month, and 5 years of history..

Watch for: Free tier is small: Free access is capped at 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations per month, and 5 years of history.

TipRanks logo

TipRanks

Best workflow fit

Best for: Retail investors who want analyst consensus, expert rankings, Smart Score, news sentiment, and stock ideas.

  • TipRanks best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, financial data API, and AI agent data access.
  • TipRanks adds a free starting point that the base tool does not show. Free access caveat: signup required and Free/Basic MCP OAuth quota is 10 tool calls per month..

Watch for: Best tools are paid: Premium and Ultimate gate Smart Portfolio, Smart Score, expert/insider/hedge-fund tools, exports, and higher MCP quotas.

GuruFocus logo

GuruFocus

Quality-checked pick

Best for: Value investors who want long historical fundamentals, GF Score, GF Value, and guru/institutional holdings.

  • GuruFocus best matches the base workflow on strategy backtesting, financial data API, and stock screening.
  • GuruFocus adds a free starting point that the base tool does not show. Free access caveat: signup required and Free account has limited platform access..

Watch for: Paid access is region and tier dependent: The existing profile records annual paid memberships, region add-ons, API plans, and pay-as-you-go API credits.

Portfolio123 logo

Portfolio123

Strong runner-up

Best for: Rules-based investors who want point-in-time stock and ETF simulations.

  • Portfolio123 best matches the base workflow on quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Portfolio123 adds a free starting point that the base tool does not show. Free access caveat: signup required and Free Manage module is separate from paid Research, API, and DataMiner access..

Watch for: Advanced research is paid: Free Manage covers portfolio tracking, while ranking, screening, backtesting, API, and DataMiner workflows sit behind paid trials or subscriptions.

Detailed Alternatives

Closest replacementWorkflow overlap 92%

Bottom line: Long-term investors who want portfolio backtests, risk metrics, correlations, optimization, and screeners in a single low-cost web workflow.

Replacement
Drop-in replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • PortfoliosLab best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, strategy backtesting, and AI agent data access.
  • PortfoliosLab matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Watchlist, ETF Comparison, ETF Screeners, and Fund Analysis.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Scenario & Stress Tests workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, financial data API, and dividend research.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, financial data API, and dividend research.
  • Free tier is small: Free access is capped at 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations per month, and 5 years of history.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free plan includes 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations/month, and 5 years of history., and Plus is shown from $8.33/month annually, Pro from $20.83/month annually, and Max from $75/month annually with MCP access..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsStock ComparisonFactor ExposurePerformance Attribution
02
GuruFocus logo

GuruFocus

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 69%

Bottom line: Value investors who want long historical fundamentals, GF Score, GF Value, and guru/institutional holdings.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Other

Why switch

  • GuruFocus best matches the base workflow on strategy backtesting, financial data API, and stock screening.
  • GuruFocus matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, ETF Screeners, Top Analysts, and ETF Comparison.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Factor Exposure, Performance Attribution, and Risk Metrics workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and AI agent data access.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and AI agent data access.
  • Paid access is region and tier dependent: The existing profile records annual paid memberships, region add-ons, API plans, and pay-as-you-go API credits.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free account has limited platform access., and Free members have limited portfolio capacity..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioBacktesting
03
Portfolio123 logo

Portfolio123

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 69%

Bottom line: Rules-based investors who want point-in-time stock and ETF simulations.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Closed-End Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Other

Why switch

  • Portfolio123 best matches the base workflow on quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Portfolio123 matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Scores, Valuation Models, and Watchlist.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Mutual Funds coverage, missing Stock Comparison, Performance Attribution, and Risk Metrics workflows, and does not clearly cover portfolio analytics, AI agent data access, and stock screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on portfolio analytics, AI agent data access, and stock screening.
  • Advanced research is paid: Free Manage covers portfolio tracking, while ranking, screening, backtesting, API, and DataMiner workflows sit behind paid trials or subscriptions.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free Manage module is separate from paid Research, API, and DataMiner access., and Homepage-led screener and backtesting access is time limited..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsFactor ExposurePortfolioBacktesting
04
TipRanks logo

TipRanks

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 62%

Bottom line: Retail investors who want analyst consensus, expert rankings, Smart Score, news sentiment, and stock ideas.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks and ETFs
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Other

Why switch

  • TipRanks best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, financial data API, and AI agent data access.
  • TipRanks matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Top Analysts, ETF Screeners, and US Government Trades.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Mutual Funds and Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Scenario & Stress Tests workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, strategy backtesting, and stock screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, strategy backtesting, and stock screening.
  • Best tools are paid: Premium and Ultimate gate Smart Portfolio, Smart Score, expert/insider/hedge-fund tools, exports, and higher MCP quotas.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free/Basic MCP OAuth quota is 10 tool calls per month., and Free API-key tier is limited to 5 requests per minute and 50 requests per month..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPerformance AttributionRisk MetricsPortfolio
05
Portfolio Visualizer logo

Portfolio Visualizer

Hands-on Tested
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 82%

Bottom line: DIY investors and advisors who need portfolio backtests, Monte Carlo analysis, optimization, correlations, factor regression, and fund analytics from a web tool.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • Portfolio Visualizer best matches the base workflow on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Portfolio Visualizer matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and quants and developers.
  • You gain Monte Carlo, ETF Screeners, Homepage advertises 5.1M annual visits, 100+ countries, 30 global markets, and 187,650 securities., and Current homepage includes a live Market Dashboard and a “Market Monitor - Top 10 Lazy Portfolios” table with YTD, 1Y, and 3Y results..

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Closed-End Funds coverage, and missing Stock Comparison, Scenario & Stress Tests, and Portfolio workflows.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on financial data API, AI agent data access, and stock screening.
  • Free tier is constrained: The free tier limits portfolio size/history and excludes current-year/YTD results, so serious workflows usually need Basic or Pro.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free tier supports portfolios with up to 15 assets and limited history., and Basic is listed at $30/month billed annually..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsFactor ExposurePerformance AttributionRisk Metrics
06
Stock Rover logo

Stock Rover

Hands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 54%

Bottom line: Serious individual investors who want deep North American stock, ETF, and fund screening.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • Stock Rover best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, stock screening, and charting and technical analysis.
  • Stock Rover matches the base audience on Analysts, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, ETF Screeners, ETF Comparison, and Monte Carlo.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Scenario & Stress Tests workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • North America-focused coverage: The existing profile records U.S. and Canadian exchange support plus OTC boards.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, New signups can test Stock Rover through a 14-day free trial with no credit card required., and Free plan has monthly limits for Stock Scores and Research Reports..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPerformance AttributionRisk MetricsPortfolio
07
Fiscal.ai logo

Fiscal.ai

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 46%

Bottom line: Investors who want AI-assisted public-company research backed by fundamentals, estimates, transcripts, filings, and dashboards.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Other

Why switch

  • Fiscal.ai best matches the base workflow on financial data API, AI agent data access, and charting and technical analysis.
  • Fiscal.ai matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Watchlist, Institutional Ownership, and ETF Analysis.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Performance Attribution workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Meaningful limits on free access: The free API trial is capped by allowed companies, burst requests, and daily request volume; deeper history, exports, and advanced datasets require paid plans.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free terminal access has dashboard, history, event, and AI prompt limits., and Free API access is capped by allowed companies, burst rate, and daily requests..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioAPIs & Data FeedsAI Research
08
TradingView logo

TradingView

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 54%

Bottom line: Traders and investors who want charting, alerts, screeners, and market coverage across many asset classes.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks and ETFs
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Other

Why switch

  • TradingView best matches the base workflow on strategy backtesting, charting and technical analysis, and screening and idea generation.
  • TradingView matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain ETF Screeners, Stock Ideas, ETF Comparison, and Watchlist.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Mutual Funds and Closed-End Funds coverage, and missing Factor Exposure, Performance Attribution, and Risk Metrics workflows.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and financial data API.
  • Real-time market data can require add-ons: The profile notes optional real-time quote subscriptions and exchange-specific data fees.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Basic tier limits charts per tab, indicators, alerts, watchlists, and historical bars., and Some real-time exchange data is sold separately from platform plans..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioBacktesting
09
okama logo

okama

Hands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 70%

Bottom line: Technical users who want a free open-source Python toolkit for portfolio optimization, risk metrics, Monte Carlo, and historical market or macro data.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • okama best matches the base workflow on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • okama matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and quants and developers.
  • You gain Monte Carlo, ETF Analysis, Macro Data, and Interactive Efficient Frontier (mean–variance) widget for quick visualization..

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Screeners, Stock Comparison, and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover financial data API, AI agent data access, and stock screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on financial data API, AI agent data access, and stock screening.
  • Developer-oriented workflow: okama is most valuable through Python, API, and widgets; non-technical investors may find it less approachable than hosted portfolio trackers.
  • Free-plan limits: Open-source Python library and free API access to end-of-day historical market data and macroeconomic indicators. and Public documentation currently describes okama 2.2.1..

Shared coverage

QuantData VisualizationsRisk MetricsPortfolioBacktestingCorrelation
10
ETF Insider logo

ETF Insider

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 64%

Bottom line: ETF and mutual fund investors who need holdings look-through, overlap, concentration, correlation, factor exposure, and efficient-frontier style portfolio views.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Other

Why switch

  • ETF Insider best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, charting and technical analysis, and screening and idea generation.
  • ETF Insider matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and quants and developers.
  • You gain ETF Screeners, ETF Analysis, ETF Overlap, and Blogs.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Quant, Stock Comparison, and Performance Attribution workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • U.S.-listed asset focus: Coverage is strongest for US-listed ETFs, mutual funds, and stocks; non-US assets outside US listings and crypto are out of scope.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free plan is listed at $0/month with up to 4 saved portfolios and limited full holdings data., and Pro is listed at $14/month with unlimited full holdings data, Excel export, and unlimited saved portfolios..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsFactor ExposureRisk MetricsPortfolioCorrelation
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 54%

Bottom line: Investors, analysts, and funds using alternative data such as search, web traffic, app usage, social, news, reviews, and transcripts to forecast company KPIs before earnings.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Other

Why switch

  • TickerTrends best matches the base workflow on financial data API, AI agent data access, and charting and technical analysis.
  • TickerTrends matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, News Sentiment, Market Sentiment, and Alerts.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing ETFs, Mutual Funds, and Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Factor Exposure, Performance Attribution, and Risk Metrics workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Alternative data is noisy: Search, social, traffic, and app signals are proxies for business performance; users need modeling discipline, validation, and company-specific KPI context.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Alternative Data Basic is advertised at $998/year or $98.70/month with a 7-day free trial., and KPI Forecasting & Full Intelligence Suite is custom priced with trial availability..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsStock ComparisonBacktestingAPIs & Data Feeds
12
Koyfin logo

Koyfin

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 38%

Bottom line: Investors who want a modern web/mobile financial terminal with dashboards, charts, screeners, portfolios, news, and alerts.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Other

Why switch

  • Koyfin best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, stock screening, and charting and technical analysis.
  • Koyfin matches the base audience on Analysts, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain ETF Screeners, Custom Dashboards, Watchlist, and News.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Quant, Stock Comparison, and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • No public API: The existing profile explicitly says Koyfin does not provide user-facing data access through an API.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free plan includes limited watchlists, screens, dashboards, alerts, portfolios, financials, and estimates history., and Advisor reporting and custodian integrations require Advisor plans..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsPortfolioCorrelationAI Research
13
FINVIZ logo

FINVIZ

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 54%

Bottom line: Investors and traders who want a fast U.S. stock screener with heat maps and snapshot views.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks and ETFs
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • FINVIZ best matches the base workflow on stock screening, charting and technical analysis, and screening and idea generation.
  • FINVIZ matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and dividend investors.
  • You gain ETF Screeners, News, Alerts, and Calendar.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Mutual Funds and Closed-End Funds coverage, and missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Performance Attribution workflows.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • U.S. market coverage: The existing profile records U.S.-only coverage for NYSE, Nasdaq, and Amex equities.
  • Free-plan limits: Free data is delayed. and Elite-only features include real-time quotes, alerts, exports, APIs, advanced filters, and intraday charts..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioBacktestingCorrelation
14
Investing.com logo

Investing.com

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 46%

Bottom line: Users who want one free global market portal for quotes, charts, calendars, news, watchlists, and portfolio tracking.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Closed-End Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • Investing.com best matches the base workflow on stock screening, charting and technical analysis, and screening and idea generation.
  • Investing.com matches the base audience on Analysts, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Options, Watchlist, and Institutional Ownership.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Mutual Funds coverage, and missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Performance Attribution workflows.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Not a broker or API product: Investing.com does not provide direct trading execution or a public API; widgets and RSS are the main integration surfaces.
  • Free-plan limits: Free access is ad-supported and does not include the full InvestingPro research layer., WarrenAI, ProPicks, premium reports, and deeper datasets are plan-gated., and Market-data latency and real-time availability vary by instrument and source..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioCorrelationAI Research
15
Stock Analysis logo

Stock Analysis

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 38%

Bottom line: Regular investors who want fast stock and fund research pages, screeners, comparisons, watchlists, and market calendars.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • Stock Analysis best matches the base workflow on stock screening, charting and technical analysis, and screening and idea generation.
  • Stock Analysis matches the base audience on Analysts, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, ETF Screeners, Top Analysts, and ETF Comparison.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Performance Attribution workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • No public API: The existing profile explicitly says Stock Analysis does not currently offer API access.
  • Free-plan limits: Free access is ad-supported., Free exports and financial history are limited compared with Pro and Unlimited., and Brokerage sync, active alerts, full ETF holdings, and advanced analyst filtering require paid plans..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonRisk MetricsPortfolio
16
Interactive Brokers (IBKR) logo

Interactive Brokers (IBKR)

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 38%

Bottom line: Active and advanced investors who need global multi-asset brokerage access, order types, APIs, and low commission schedules.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • Interactive Brokers (IBKR) best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, financial data API, and charting and technical analysis.
  • Interactive Brokers (IBKR) matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain Brokerage, Advanced Order Types, Smart/Direct Routing, and Paper Trading.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Quant, Data Visualizations, and Stock Comparison workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, strategy backtesting, and AI agent data access.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, strategy backtesting, and AI agent data access.
  • Commission and market-data details vary by market: The record contains separate stock, ETF, options, futures, crypto, and market-data pricing notes by region and product.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Brokerage account has no recurring platform fee in the profile, but trading commissions and add-on fees vary by product., and Real-time market data and Level II data generally require subscriptions..

Shared coverage

ScreenersPerformance AttributionRisk MetricsPortfolioAPIs & Data Feeds
17
Seeking Alpha logo

Seeking Alpha

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 38%

Bottom line: Retail investors who want news, contributor analysis, quant ratings, screeners, and portfolio alerts together.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • Seeking Alpha best matches the base workflow on stock screening, charting and technical analysis, and screening and idea generation.
  • Seeking Alpha matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and dividend investors.
  • You gain News, News Sentiment, Alerts, and Calendar.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Closed-End Funds coverage, and missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Performance Attribution workflows.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Free access is limited: The Basic plan has limited premium-article access and core portfolio/watchlist features.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Basic has limited premium-article access., and Premium is needed for unlimited articles/transcripts, ratings, factor grades, screeners, comparisons, broker linking, and AI summaries..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioAI Research
18
Uncle Stock logo

Uncle Stock

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 45%

Bottom line: Value and long-term investors who need global fundamental screening, many metrics, watchlists, historical backtests, CSV export, and lightweight portfolio alerts.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • Uncle Stock best matches the base workflow on strategy backtesting, financial data API, and AI agent data access.
  • Uncle Stock matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and quants and developers.
  • You gain Financials, Valuation Models, Scores, and Institutional Ownership.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing ETFs, Mutual Funds, and Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Quant, Stock Comparison, and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and dividend research.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and dividend research.
  • API is Gold-gated and capped: Uncle Stock API docs say API keys require Gold, search is limited to 10 calls/minute, and the API has a 300-call/month cap unless users contact the vendor.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Subscription page lists Bronze at $20/month or $130/year, Silver at $35/month or $210/year, and Gold at $60/month or $350/year., and The page says Gold includes CSV export with max 300 calls/month and unlimited MCP stock searches/day versus 5/day on the free tier..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsPortfolioBacktestingAPIs & Data Feeds
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 38%

Bottom line: Advisors and ETF professionals who need ETF classification, look-through holdings analytics, overlap, flows, 13F screening, model portfolios, reports, and enterprise data workflows.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks and ETFs
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • ETF Action best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, financial data API, and charting and technical analysis.
  • ETF Action matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and quants and developers.
  • You gain ETF Analysis, ETF Factors, ETF Overlap, and Watchlist.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Mutual Funds and Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Quant, Stock Comparison, and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, strategy backtesting, and AI agent data access.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, strategy backtesting, and AI agent data access.
  • Paid tiers drive the product value: Free access is for general market awareness; look-through analytics, exports, 13F screening, and model building are paid-tier workflows.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free plan includes basic fund data, classifications, dashboards, and sponsored marketplace access., and DIY is listed at $29/month and Advisor Pro at $99/month..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsPortfolioBacktestingAPIs & Data Feeds
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 38%

Bottom line: Growth and momentum investors who want earnings momentum, estimate revisions, PEAD drift, timing signals, scanners, dashboards, and AI analysis in one US stock/ETF platform.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Cheaper starting point
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks and ETFs
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • EPSMomentum best matches the base workflow on stock screening, charting and technical analysis, and screening and idea generation.
  • EPSMomentum matches the base audience on Analysts, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Money Flow, Watchlist, and News.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Mutual Funds and Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Quant, Stock Comparison, and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • US stocks and ETFs focus: EPSMomentum is not positioned as a global multi-asset terminal or full portfolio accounting product.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Bronze is advertised at $0/month., and Silver is advertised at $9.99/month and Gold at $49.99/month, with yearly-plan discounts shown..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsPortfolioBacktestingAI Research

What This Shortlist Tells You

PortfoliosLab is the closest drop-in replacement with overlapping coverage in Screeners, Quant, and Data Visualizations while adding Watchlist and ETF Comparison coverage, Portfolio and instrument analytics suite with 20+ tools for performance, risk, diversification and optimization (portfolio analysis, portfolio performance, stock comparison, Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Martin, VaR, CVaR, volatility models). and Portfolio tracking for both static and transactional portfolios, including lazy model portfolios and public user portfolios, with benchmarking against indices and other portfolios. features, and a free tier (workflow overlap ~92%).

Every pick keeps a free tier; start with PortfoliosLab, GuruFocus, and Portfolio123 to road-test FactorsToday workflows without paying up front.

Need mobile access? GuruFocus, TipRanks, and Stock Rover bring phone-ready workflows that FactorsToday lacks.

Round out your stack with new coverage areas like Watchlist, ETF Comparison, ETF Screeners, and Fund Analysis.

FactorsToday still leads on Scenario & Stress Tests, so keep it handy for those workflows.

Coverage Snapshot

Where alternatives already align

Most shared categories across the top matches.

Data Visualizations×19Screeners×19Portfolio×18APIs & Data Feeds×12AI Research×11Backtesting×11Correlation×11Stock Comparison×11

New angles introduced

Categories the alternatives add beyond FactorsToday.

Watchlist+15Financials+13Alerts+12News+12ETF Analysis+11ETF Screeners+11Stock Ideas+11Calendar+10

Free Access & Pricing

Free options

All 20

20 vetted picks keep a permanent free tier so you can validate workflows before upgrading.

Mobile ready

10/20

10 alternatives bring native mobile access.

API availability

12/20

12 of the shortlisted tools expose API endpoints for automation-heavy workflows.

Quality checks

13 starred / 16 tested

13 tools are flagged as analyst picks; 16 have been hands-on tested.

Avg. coverage overlap

55%

Average percentage of categories shared with the base tool.

Free Alternatives FAQ

What are the best free alternatives to FactorsToday?

Start with PortfoliosLab, GuruFocus, and Portfolio123 to replicate FactorsToday workflows without paying for a subscription.

Do these picks stay permanently free?

Yes. Each platform listed keeps a standing free tier with no credit card required -- though export limits or seat caps may apply if you scale usage.

Which FactorsToday workflows stay covered on the free plan?

Expect solid overlap across Screeners, Quant, Data Visualizations, Stock Comparison, Factor Exposure, Performance Attribution, Risk Metrics, Portfolio, Backtesting, Correlation, APIs & Data Feeds, and AI Research, so core FactorsToday workflows can move over without a paid upgrade.

What extra coverage do the free alternatives add?

Watchlist, ETF Comparison, ETF Screeners, Fund Analysis, AI Chat, Stock Ideas, Top Analysts, Institutional Ownership, US Government Trades, News, Alerts, Calendar, Corporate Actions & Special Situations, IPO, Dividends, Splits, Macro Data, Yield Curves, Financials, Scores, Flags, Valuation Models, Improved Filings, Transcripts, Insider Data, Short Interest, Options, ETF Analysis, Analyst Forecasts, Analyst Ratings & Price Targets, Sheets / Excel Add-ins, Broker Connectors, Education, Blogs, Videos, Forums, Newsletters, Custom Dashboards, Stock Handbook, Bulls Say Bear Say, News Sentiment, Guidance / Pre-announcements, Options P&L, Compounding Calculator, Retirement Calculator, Monte Carlo, Notes & Highlights, Webhooks, Paper Trading, Order Book / Level II, ETF Overlap, Market Sentiment, Reddit, Earnings Calls Sentiment, App & Website Traffic, Employee/Consumer Reviews, Advisor Operations, CDS Spreads, Brokerage, Advanced Order Types, Smart/Direct Routing, Crypto Derivatives, ETF Factors, Money Flow, and Dark Pool & Off-Exchange show up most often as bonus coverage beyond the base platform, giving you room to experiment before upgrading.

Where might I still rely on FactorsToday?

Scenario & Stress Tests, Factor Exposure, Performance Attribution, Risk Metrics, Stock Comparison, Quant, Backtesting, Correlation, Portfolio, APIs & Data Feeds, AI Research, Screeners, and Data Visualizations remain strengths for FactorsToday. Keep it handy for those tasks or plan for a paid upgrade if they matter.

Keep Exploring

Information

About Me

Hey! Thanks for stopping by. I'm an independent investor with a soft spot for coding and the stock market - especially value investing (as you can probably tell from the tools I've collected here, haha). Hopefully you'll find something useful or interesting along the way.

Find me here:

Got questions or suggestions? I'm all ears!

Missing a Tool?

Discovered a gem I don't have here yet? Drop the link below and I'll check it out ASAP. Tagging me on X works too! Can't wait to see what you've found!

OR

Got ideas for new features?

Suggest on X

Prefer email? Reach me at support@findmymoat.com

Starred Tools

These are my top picks. Tools I've tested thoroughly and found to be excellent. They do their job really well, and I use them a lot. If you're not already familiar with them, I highly recommend checking them out.

Tested Tools

These are tools I've tried and found to be solid, but not standout. Think of them as passing an initial quality screen: worth exploring, though not all will be exceptional.

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.