FactorsToday Alternatives & Competitors

Checking

Replacement verdicts

FactorsToday logo

Alternatives to FactorsToday

Curated replacements grouped by fit, tradeoffs, pricing flexibility, and platform access. Use this list to decide which FactorsToday competitor is worth testing first.

Looking for a FactorsToday replacement? We've profiled 20 alternatives by workflow fit, pricing flexibility, caveats, and platform access. Whether you need a free option to trial, mobile-ready workflows, or API integrations, this list helps you choose what to test first.

Disclosure: outbound links may include affiliate or sponsor links

Which Alternative Should You Use?

PortfoliosLab logo

PortfoliosLab

Closest replacement

Best for: Long-term investors who want portfolio backtests, risk metrics, correlations, optimization, and screeners in one web service.

  • PortfoliosLab best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, strategy backtesting, and AI agent data access.
  • PortfoliosLab keeps the replacement test in the same free-access lane. Free access caveat: signup required and Free plan includes 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations/month, and 5 years of history..

Watch for: Free tier is small: Free access is capped at 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations per month, and 5 years of history.

GuruFocus logo

GuruFocus

Best workflow fit

Best for: Value investors looking for long historical fundamentals, GF Score, GF Value, and guru/institutional holdings.

  • GuruFocus best matches the base workflow on strategy backtesting, financial data API, and stock screening.
  • GuruFocus keeps the replacement test in the same free-access lane. Free access caveat: signup required and A free account has limited access..

Watch for: Paid access is region and tier dependent: Annual paid memberships, region add-ons, API plans, and pay-as-you-go API credits.

Portfolio123 logo

Portfolio123

Strong runner-up

Best for: Rules-based investors looking for point-in-time stock and ETF simulations.

  • Portfolio123 best matches the base workflow on quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Portfolio123 keeps the replacement test in the same free-access lane. Free access caveat: signup required and Free Manage module is separate from paid Research, API, and DataMiner access..

Watch for: Advanced research is paid: Free Manage covers portfolio tracking. Time-limited access covers screener and backtesting use before a paid Research plan, while API and DataMiner require separate paid access.

YCharts logo

YCharts

Strong runner-up

Best for: Financial advisors and asset managers who need portfolio analytics, proposals, reports, and client-ready visuals.

  • YCharts best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, stock screening, and charting and technical analysis.
  • YCharts does not appear to keep a permanent free tier, so budget-sensitive users should verify the plan before switching.

Watch for: Pricing is sales-led: The current plans page directs buyers to call or schedule a pricing conversation.

Detailed Alternatives

Closest replacementWorkflow overlap 92%

Bottom line: Long-term investors who want portfolio backtests, risk metrics, correlations, optimization, and screeners in one web service.

Replacement
Drop-in replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • PortfoliosLab best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, strategy backtesting, and AI agent data access.
  • PortfoliosLab matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Watchlist, ETF Comparison, ETF Screeners, and Fund Analysis.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Scenario & Stress Tests workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, financial data API, and fundamental research.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, financial data API, and fundamental research.
  • Free tier is small: Free access is capped at 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations per month, and 5 years of history.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free plan includes 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations/month, and 5 years of history., and Annual billing works out to $8.33 per month for Plus, $20.83 for Pro, and $75 for Max..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsStock ComparisonFactor ExposurePerformance Attribution
02
GuruFocus logo

GuruFocus

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 69%

Bottom line: Value investors looking for long historical fundamentals, GF Score, GF Value, and guru/institutional holdings.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • GuruFocus best matches the base workflow on strategy backtesting, financial data API, and stock screening.
  • GuruFocus matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, ETF Screeners, Top Analysts, and ETF Comparison.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Factor Exposure, Performance Attribution, and Risk Metrics workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and AI agent data access.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and AI agent data access.
  • Paid access is region and tier dependent: Annual paid memberships, region add-ons, API plans, and pay-as-you-go API credits.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, A free account has limited access., and Free members have limited portfolio capacity..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioBacktesting
03
Portfolio123 logo

Portfolio123

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 69%

Bottom line: Rules-based investors looking for point-in-time stock and ETF simulations.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Closed-End Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Portfolio123 best matches the base workflow on quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Portfolio123 matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Scores, Valuation Models, and Watchlist.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Mutual Funds coverage, missing Stock Comparison, Performance Attribution, and Risk Metrics workflows, and does not clearly cover portfolio analytics, AI agent data access, and stock screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on portfolio analytics, AI agent data access, and stock screening.
  • Advanced research is paid: Free Manage covers portfolio tracking. Time-limited access covers screener and backtesting use before a paid Research plan, while API and DataMiner require separate paid access.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free Manage module is separate from paid Research, API, and DataMiner access., and General registration offers 30 days of screener and backtesting access without a payment card..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsFactor ExposurePortfolioBacktesting
04
YCharts logo

YCharts

Hands-on Tested
Broad workflow fitWorkflow overlap 69%

Bottom line: Financial advisors and asset managers who need portfolio analytics, proposals, reports, and client-ready visuals.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Paid-only mismatch
Free tier
No
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • YCharts best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, stock screening, and charting and technical analysis.
  • YCharts matches the base audience on Analysts, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain ETF Comparison, Watchlist, Alerts, and Monte Carlo.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Backtesting workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Pricing is sales-led: The current plans page directs buyers to call or schedule a pricing conversation.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Trial-only access, and Current public plans page is quote-led rather than self-serve..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPerformance AttributionRisk MetricsScenario & Stress Tests
05
TipRanks logo

TipRanks

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 62%

Bottom line: Retail investors looking for analyst consensus, expert rankings, Smart Score, news sentiment, and stock ideas.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks and ETFs
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • TipRanks best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, financial data API, and AI agent data access.
  • TipRanks matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Top Analysts, ETF Screeners, and US Government Trades.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Mutual Funds and Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Scenario & Stress Tests workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, strategy backtesting, and stock screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, strategy backtesting, and stock screening.
  • Best tools are paid: Premium and Ultimate gate Smart Portfolio, Smart Score, expert/insider/hedge-fund tools, exports, and higher MCP quotas.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free/Basic MCP OAuth quota is 10 tool calls per month., and Free API-key tier is limited to 10 requests per minute and 50 requests per month..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPerformance AttributionRisk MetricsPortfolio
06
Portfolio Visualizer logo

Portfolio Visualizer

Hands-on Tested
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 80%

Bottom line: DIY investors and advisors needing portfolio backtests, Monte Carlo analysis, optimization, correlations, factor regression, and fund analytics from a web tool.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Portfolio Visualizer best matches the base workflow on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Portfolio Visualizer matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and fundamental investors.
  • You gain Monte Carlo, ETF Screeners, Homepage advertises 5.1M annual visits, 100+ countries, 30 global markets, and 187,650 securities., and The homepage includes a Market Dashboard and a Market Monitor table with current and trailing portfolio results..

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Closed-End Funds coverage, and missing Screeners, Stock Comparison, and Scenario & Stress Tests workflows.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on financial data API, AI agent data access, and stock screening.
  • Free tier is constrained: The free tier limits portfolio size/history and excludes current-year/YTD results, so serious workflows usually need Basic or Pro.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free tier supports portfolios with up to 15 assets and limited history., and Basic is listed at $30/month billed annually..

Shared coverage

QuantData VisualizationsFactor ExposurePerformance AttributionRisk MetricsBacktesting
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 62%

Bottom line: Institutional investors that want explainable AI research over trusted financial datasets, filings, transcripts, portfolio insights, scenario analysis, and auditable outputs.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks and ETFs
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Reflexivity best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, strategy backtesting, and stock screening.
  • Reflexivity matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and fundamental investors.
  • You gain Alerts, News, Calendar, and Transcripts.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Mutual Funds and Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Data Visualizations, Stock Comparison, and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, financial data API, and AI agent data access.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, financial data API, and AI agent data access.
  • Direct access is sales-led: Institutional access requires a sales conversation. Public pricing is available only for the IBKR Basic and Plus subscriptions.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Interactive Brokers lists Reflexivity Basic as free and Reflexivity Plus at $99.99 per month., and IBKR subscriptions begin with a two-week trial of the full platform, then move to Basic or the paid version..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantPerformance AttributionScenario & Stress TestsPortfolioBacktesting
08
Stock Rover logo

Stock Rover

Hands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 54%

Bottom line: Individual investors looking for North American stock, ETF, and fund screening.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Stock Rover best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, stock screening, and charting and technical analysis.
  • Stock Rover matches the base audience on Analysts, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, ETF Screeners, ETF Comparison, and Monte Carlo.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Scenario & Stress Tests workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • North America-focused coverage: U.S. and Canadian exchange support plus OTC boards.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, New signups can test Stock Rover through a 14-day free trial with no credit card required., and Free plan has monthly limits for Stock Scores and Research Reports..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPerformance AttributionRisk MetricsPortfolio
09
Stock Analysis logo

Stock Analysis

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 46%

Bottom line: Regular investors looking for fast stock and fund research pages, screeners, comparisons, watchlists, and market calendars.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Stock Analysis best matches the base workflow on stock screening, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • Stock Analysis matches the base audience on Analysts, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, ETF Screeners, Top Analysts, and ETF Comparison.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Performance Attribution workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • No public API: Stock Analysis does not currently offer API access.
  • Free-plan limits: Free access is ad-supported., Free exports and financial history are limited compared with Pro and Unlimited., and Free accounts allow 10 active alerts. Brokerage sync, full ETF holdings, and advanced analyst filtering require paid plans..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonRisk MetricsPortfolioAI Research
10
TradingView logo

TradingView

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 54%

Bottom line: Traders and investors looking for charting, alerts, screeners, and market coverage across many asset classes.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks and ETFs
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • TradingView best matches the base workflow on strategy backtesting, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • TradingView matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain ETF Screeners, Stock Ideas, ETF Comparison, and Watchlist.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Mutual Funds and Closed-End Funds coverage, and missing Factor Exposure, Performance Attribution, and Risk Metrics workflows.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and financial data API.
  • Real-time market data can require add-ons: Optional real-time quote subscriptions and exchange-specific data fees.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Basic tier limits charts per tab, indicators, alerts, watchlists, and historical bars., and Some real-time exchange data is sold separately from platform plans..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioBacktesting
11
FINVIZ logo

FINVIZ

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 54%

Bottom line: Investors and traders looking for a fast U.S. stock screener with heat maps and snapshot views.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks and ETFs
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • FINVIZ best matches the base workflow on stock screening, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • FINVIZ matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and fundamental investors.
  • You gain ETF Screeners, News, Alerts, and Calendar.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Mutual Funds and Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Performance Attribution workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • U.S. market coverage: U.S.-only coverage for NYSE, Nasdaq, and Amex equities.
  • Free-plan limits: Credit card required, Free stock quotes are delayed by one minute and futures by 20 minutes., and The 7-day Elite trial requires a card and automatically converts to the selected paid plan..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioBacktestingCorrelation
12
Fiscal.ai logo

Fiscal.ai

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 46%

Bottom line: Investors who want AI-assisted company research backed by financials, estimates, transcripts, filings, and dashboards.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Fiscal.ai best matches the base workflow on financial data API, AI agent data access, and charting and technical analysis.
  • Fiscal.ai matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Watchlist, Institutional Ownership, and ETF Analysis.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Performance Attribution workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Free access is limited: The free API is limited to 100 companies, 50 requests per minute, and 250 requests per day. Deeper history, exports, and some datasets require paid plans.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free terminal access has dashboard, history, event, and AI prompt limits., and Free API access covers 100 companies, 50 requests per minute, and 250 requests per day..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioAPIs & Data FeedsAI Research
13
Investing.com logo

Investing.com

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 46%

Bottom line: Users looking for one free global market portal for quotes, charts, calendars, news, watchlists, and portfolio tracking.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Closed-End Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Investing.com best matches the base workflow on stock screening, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • Investing.com matches the base audience on Analysts, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Options, Watchlist, and Institutional Ownership.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Mutual Funds coverage, and missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Performance Attribution workflows.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Not a broker or API product: Investing.com does not provide trade execution or a public API. Widgets and RSS are its public integration methods.
  • Free-plan limits: Free access is ad-supported and does not include the full InvestingPro research layer., Free WarrenAI access is limited to 10 lifetime messages and requires an account; paid plans include 50 or 500 credits per month., and ProPicks, premium reports, and deeper datasets are plan-gated..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioCorrelationAI Research
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 54%

Bottom line: Investors, analysts, and funds using alternative data such as search, web traffic, app usage, social, news, reviews, and transcripts to forecast company KPIs before earnings.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • TickerTrends best matches the base workflow on financial data API, AI agent data access, and charting and technical analysis.
  • TickerTrends matches the base audience on Analysts, Quants/Developers, and Intermediate.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, News Sentiment, Market Sentiment, and Alerts.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing ETFs, Mutual Funds, and Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Factor Exposure, Performance Attribution, and Risk Metrics workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Alternative data is noisy: Search, social, traffic, and app signals are proxies for business performance. Users need modeling discipline, validation, and company-specific KPI context.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, TickerTrends Core is $998 per year after a seven-day trial and carries a 30-day money-back guarantee., and KPI Tracking Suite is custom priced with a trial available by request..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsStock ComparisonBacktestingAPIs & Data Feeds
15
okama logo

okama

Hands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 70%

Bottom line: Technical users who want a free, open-source Python toolkit for portfolio optimization, risk metrics, Monte Carlo, and historical market or macro data.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • okama best matches the base workflow on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • okama matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and quants and developers.
  • You gain Monte Carlo, ETF Analysis, Macro Data, and Interactive Efficient Frontier mean-variance widget..

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Screeners, Stock Comparison, and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover financial data API, AI agent data access, and stock screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on financial data API, AI agent data access, and stock screening.
  • Developer-oriented workflow: okama is designed for Python, API, and widget workflows. Nontechnical investors may find a hosted portfolio tracker easier to use.
  • Free-plan limits: Open-source Python library and free API access to end-of-day historical market data and macroeconomic indicators. and Public documentation currently describes okama 2.3.0..

Shared coverage

QuantData VisualizationsRisk MetricsPortfolioBacktestingCorrelation
16
Koyfin logo

Koyfin

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 38%

Bottom line: Investors who want dashboards, charts, screeners, portfolios, news, and alerts in a web and mobile workspace.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Koyfin best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, stock screening, and charting and technical analysis.
  • Koyfin matches the base audience on Analysts, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain ETF Screeners, Custom Dashboards, Watchlist, and News.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Quant, Stock Comparison, and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • No public API: Koyfin does not provide user-facing data access through an API.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free plan includes limited watchlists, screens, dashboards, alerts, portfolios, financials, and estimates history., and New accounts receive a seven-day trial and then downgrade to Free without a charge..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsPortfolioCorrelationAI Research
17
ETF Insider logo

ETF Insider

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 60%

Bottom line: ETF and mutual fund investors needing holdings look-through, overlap, concentration, correlation, factor exposure, and efficient-frontier style portfolio views.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • ETF Insider best matches the base workflow on portfolio analytics, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • ETF Insider matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and quants and developers.
  • You gain ETF Screeners, ETF Analysis, ETF Overlap, and Blogs.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Screeners, Quant, and Stock Comparison workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, strategy backtesting, and financial data API.
  • U.S.-listed asset focus: Coverage is strongest for US-listed ETFs, mutual funds, and stocks. non-US assets outside US listings and crypto are out of scope.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free plan is listed at $0/month with up to 4 saved portfolios and limited full holdings data., and Pro is listed at $14/month with unlimited full holdings data, Excel export, and unlimited saved portfolios..

Shared coverage

Data VisualizationsFactor ExposureRisk MetricsPortfolioCorrelationAPIs & Data Feeds
Broad workflow fitWorkflow overlap 64%

Bottom line: Systematic traders who want AFL scripting, charting, scanning, optimization, Monte Carlo analysis, and portfolio backtesting on Windows.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Paid-only mismatch
Free tier
No
Assets
Stocks and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced

Why switch

  • AmiBroker best matches the base workflow on quant research, strategy backtesting, and charting and technical analysis.
  • AmiBroker matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Intermediate, and Advanced.
  • You gain Monte Carlo, Alerts, Auto-Trading & Bots, and Broker Connectors.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Web and API access, missing ETFs and Closed-End Funds coverage, and missing Stock Comparison, Factor Exposure, and Performance Attribution workflows.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on portfolio analytics, financial data API, and AI agent data access.
  • Windows desktop workflow: AmiBroker is a Windows desktop application. It does not provide a native web, macOS, or mobile workflow.
  • Free-plan limits: Trial-only access, Standard costs $299, Professional costs $379, and Ultimate Pack Pro costs $499 before applicable tax., and New licenses include 24 months of upgrades, email support, and maintenance..

Shared coverage

ScreenersQuantData VisualizationsRisk MetricsBacktestingCorrelation
19
Seeking Alpha logo

Seeking Alpha

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 38%

Bottom line: Retail investors looking for news, contributor analysis, quant ratings, screeners, and portfolio alerts together.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Seeking Alpha best matches the base workflow on stock screening, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • Seeking Alpha matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and fundamental investors.
  • You gain News, News Sentiment, Alerts, and Calendar.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing API access, missing Closed-End Funds coverage, and missing Quant, Factor Exposure, and Performance Attribution workflows.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and strategy backtesting.
  • Free access is limited: The Basic plan has limited premium-article access and core portfolio/watchlist features.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Basic has limited premium-article access., and Premium is needed for unlimited articles/transcripts, ratings, factor grades, screeners, comparisons, broker linking, and AI summaries..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsStock ComparisonPortfolioAI Research
20
Uncle Stock logo

Uncle Stock

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 45%

Bottom line: Value and long-term investors screening global companies by financial statements, ratios, scores, and valuation models.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and API
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Intermediate and Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Uncle Stock best matches the base workflow on strategy backtesting, financial data API, and AI agent data access.
  • Uncle Stock matches the base audience on Intermediate, Advanced, and fundamental investors.
  • You gain Financials, Valuation Models, Scores, and Institutional Ownership.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing ETFs, Mutual Funds, and Closed-End Funds coverage, missing Quant, Stock Comparison, and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, portfolio analytics, and dividend research.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, portfolio analytics, and dividend research.
  • API is Gold-gated and capped: The JSON Search API requires Gold and is capped at 10 calls per minute and 300 calls per month unless the vendor raises the limit.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Subscription page lists Bronze at $20/month or $130/year, Silver at $35/month or $210/year, and Gold at $60/month or $350/year., and The page says Gold includes CSV export with max 300 calls/month and unlimited MCP stock searches/day versus 5/day on the free tier..

Shared coverage

ScreenersData VisualizationsPortfolioBacktestingAPIs & Data Feeds

What This Shortlist Tells You

PortfoliosLab is the closest drop-in replacement with overlapping coverage in Screeners, Quant, and Data Visualizations while adding Watchlist and ETF Comparison coverage and Portfolio and instrument analytics suite with 20+ tools for performance, risk, diversification and optimization (portfolio analysis, portfolio performance, stock comparison, Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Martin, VaR, CVaR, volatility models). and Portfolio tracking for both static and transactional portfolios, including lazy model portfolios and public user portfolios, with benchmarking against indices and other portfolios. features (workflow overlap ~92%).

Free tiers remain available through PortfoliosLab, GuruFocus, Portfolio123, TipRanks, Portfolio Visualizer, Reflexivity, Stock Rover, Stock Analysis, TradingView, FINVIZ, Fiscal.ai, Investing.com, TickerTrends, okama, Koyfin, ETF Insider, Seeking Alpha, and Uncle Stock for side-by-side testing.

Need mobile access? GuruFocus, TipRanks, and Stock Rover bring phone-ready workflows that FactorsToday lacks.

Round out your stack with new coverage areas like Watchlist, ETF Comparison, ETF Screeners, and Fund Analysis.

Coverage Snapshot

Where alternatives already align

Most shared categories across the top matches.

Data Visualizations×19Portfolio×17Screeners×17AI Research×13Correlation×13APIs & Data Feeds×12Stock Comparison×12Backtesting×11

New angles introduced

Categories the alternatives add beyond FactorsToday.

Alerts+15Financials+13Watchlist+13Calendar+11ETF Analysis+11ETF Screeners+11News+11Stock Ideas+10

Access & Pricing

Free options

18/20

18 of 20 alternatives keep a free tier for trials.

Mobile ready

8/20

8 alternatives bring native mobile access.

API availability

11/20

11 of the shortlisted tools expose API endpoints for automation-heavy workflows.

Quality checks

12 starred / 16 tested

12 tools are flagged as analyst picks; 16 have been hands-on tested.

Avg. coverage overlap

59%

Average percentage of categories shared with the base tool.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the best alternatives to FactorsToday?

FactorsToday users most often consider PortfoliosLab, GuruFocus, and Portfolio123 as their go-to alternatives.

Which alternatives keep a free tier?

PortfoliosLab, GuruFocus, Portfolio123, TipRanks, Portfolio Visualizer, Reflexivity, Stock Rover, Stock Analysis, TradingView, FINVIZ, Fiscal.ai, Investing.com, TickerTrends, okama, Koyfin, ETF Insider, Seeking Alpha, and Uncle Stock offer a free plan or trial option, making them easy to test before committing to a paid subscription.

Which workflows do the top FactorsToday alternatives cover?

Expect deep coverage across AI Research, APIs & Data Feeds, Backtesting, Correlation, Data Visualizations, Factor Exposure, Performance Attribution, Portfolio, Quant, Risk Metrics, Scenario & Stress Tests, Screeners, and Stock Comparison, so you can port most FactorsToday workflows without much friction.

Keep Exploring

Information

About Me

Hey! Thanks for stopping by. I'm an independent investor with a soft spot for coding and the stock market - especially value investing (as you can probably tell from the tools I've collected here, haha). Hopefully you'll find something useful or interesting along the way.

Find me here:

Got questions or suggestions? I'm all ears!

Missing a Tool?

Discovered a gem I don't have here yet? Drop the link below and I'll check it out ASAP. Tagging me on X works too! Can't wait to see what you've found!

OR

Got ideas for new features?

Suggest on X

Prefer email? Reach me at support@findmymoat.com

Starred Tools

These are my top picks. Tools I've tested thoroughly and found to be excellent. They do their job really well, and I use them a lot. If you're not already familiar with them, I highly recommend checking them out.

Tested Tools

These are tools I've tried and found to be solid, but not standout. Think of them as passing an initial quality screen: worth exploring, though not all will be exceptional.

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.