★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Stock Profile

Rightmove plc (RMV) Moat Analysis

Rightmove plc

RMV · London Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$5.1B
SectorReal Estate
IndustryInternet Content & Information
CountryGB
Data as of
Moat score
95/ 100

Partial score covering 90% of segment weight.

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Rightmove operates the UK's leading online property marketplace. Its core moat is a two-sided network supported by 90% of consumer portal time under Comscore and 75% under SimilarWeb and Sensor Tower. H1 2026 revenue rose 7% to GBP 225.8 million, with Agency contributing 72.6%, New Homes 16.9%, and Other 10.5%. Agency revenue grew 9%, ARPA rose 8%, membership grew 1%, and retention reached its highest first-half level in more than a decade. New Homes revenue grew only 2% as membership fell 6% year over year. Rightmove cut full-year revenue growth guidance to 6% to 8% from 8% to 10%. Intensified portal competition, fee scrutiny, AI and search behavior changes, and UK housing cyclicality are the main risks.

Primary segment

Agency

Market structure

Quasi-Monopoly

Market share

75%-90% (reported)

HHI:

Coverage

3 segments · 6 tags

Updated 2026-08-23

Segments

Agency

UK residential property portal advertising subscriptions and lead generation for estate and letting agents

Revenue

72.6%

Structure

Quasi-Monopoly

Pricing

strong

Share

75%-90% (reported)

Peers

CSGP

New Homes

UK new homes developer portal advertising and lead generation

Revenue

16.9%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

CSGP

Other

UK property-adjacent digital services (commercial property advertising, mortgages/financial services leads, data services, overseas/third-party)

Revenue

10.5%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

AUTO.LCSGP

Moat Claims

Agency

UK residential property portal advertising subscriptions and lead generation for estate and letting agents

H1 2026 revenue share uses Agency revenue of GBP 163.9m divided by total revenue of GBP 225.8m. Source: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/half-year-financial-report-zeravls2m6pvl4r.html

Quasi-Monopoly

Two Sided Network

Network

Strength

Strength 5 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Large consumer audience and listing inventory reinforce agent demand; agents/listings reinforce consumer usefulness.

Two Sided Network moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Deep-pocketed competitor scaling up via aggressive marketing and product spend
  • Regulatory or legal action targeting fees or market dominance
  • Agent consolidation increasing buyer power

Leading indicators

  • Share of time spent on UK property portals
  • Advertiser count and churn/retention
  • ARPA growth vs inflation

Counterarguments

  • Agents can multi-home across portals, reducing exclusivity
  • A well-funded challenger could subsidize listings and buy traffic to close the gap

Procurement Inertia

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

High partner retention alongside ARPA growth indicates agents feel compelled to remain due to lead volume, product breadth, and industry norms.

Procurement Inertia moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • CoStar/OnTheMarket (or others) offering materially lower prices for comparable lead volume
  • Large agency groups negotiating down pricing
  • Regulatory interventions on fees or practices

Leading indicators

  • Agency retention rate
  • Upgrades to premium packages
  • Average revenue per advertiser (ARPA)

Counterarguments

  • Some agencies may cut spend in downturns or shift budget to performance marketing
  • If competitor lead quality improves, procurement inertia may break faster than expected

New Homes

UK new homes developer portal advertising and lead generation

H1 2026 revenue share uses New Homes revenue of GBP 38.2m divided by total revenue of GBP 225.8m. Source: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/half-year-financial-report-zeravls2m6pvl4r.html

Oligopoly

Two Sided Network

Network

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 3 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Developers advertise where the largest buyer audience is; buyer audience is reinforced by breadth of listings.

Two Sided Network moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Developers reallocating budget to their own direct channels and performance marketing
  • Downturn in new build volumes reducing advertiser count
  • Competitors bundling incentives for developer listings

Leading indicators

  • New Homes development count
  • New Homes ARPA trend
  • Share of time spent / buyer traffic levels

Counterarguments

  • Developers can generate demand through alternative channels (own sites, social, search, broker networks)
  • New homes advertising may be more price elastic than agency subscriptions

Other

UK property-adjacent digital services (commercial property advertising, mortgages/financial services leads, data services, overseas/third-party)

H1 2026 revenue share uses Other revenue of GBP 23.7m divided by total revenue of GBP 225.8m. Source: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/half-year-financial-report-zeravls2m6pvl4r.html

Competitive

Insufficient segment-specific evidence to assign a moat claim.

Evidence

other

consumer engagement, network effects and established partnerships

Annual report highlights network effects as part of the platform investment case.

other

Over 80% of all time spent on UK property portals in 2025 was spent on Rightmove

High share of consumer attention supports the demand-side of the marketplace and attracts/retains advertisers.

other

supported by strong retention (90%)

High retention suggests agents are reluctant to churn despite fee/mix increases.

other

Agency ARPA(4) increased 6%

Rising ARPA with stable membership supports pricing power and buyer inertia.

other

90% Comscore; 75% SimilarWeb/Sensor Tower

The latest interim release reports increased consumer attention share using two independent traffic datasets.

Showing 5 of 7 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Deep-pocketed competitor scaling up via aggressive marketing and product spend
  • Regulatory or legal action targeting fees or market dominance
  • Agent consolidation increasing buyer power
  • Consumers shifting discovery to social media/search/AI assistants
  • CoStar/OnTheMarket (or others) offering materially lower prices for comparable lead volume
  • Large agency groups negotiating down pricing

Leading indicators

  • Share of time spent on UK property portals
  • Advertiser count and churn/retention
  • ARPA growth vs inflation
  • Competitor marketing spend and traffic growth
  • Agency retention rate
  • Upgrades to premium packages

Keep the research going

Created 2026-01-09
Updated 2026-08-23

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.