★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Stock Profile

Unilever PLC (ULVR) Moat Analysis

Unilever PLC

ULVR · London Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$119.7B
SectorConsumer
IndustryHousehold & Personal Products
CountryGB
Data as of
Moat score
71/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Unilever PLC is a global consumer goods company organised around four continuing Business Groups after demerging Ice Cream: Beauty & Wellbeing, Personal Care, Home Care, and Foods. In FY2025, continuing turnover was EUR 50.5bn, with Personal Care and Foods each slightly above one-quarter of sales. The evidence-backed moats are demand-side brand advantages: Power Brands represented 78% of turnover and continued to outgrow the portfolio in Q1 2026. Broad distribution, R&D and supply-chain scale are important capabilities but are not separately treated as durable moats without comparative evidence. Competitive intensity remains high, with retailer bargaining power and private-label and local-brand pressure as persistent headwinds.

Primary segment

Personal Care

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

4 segments · 8 tags

Updated 2026-07-12

Segments

Beauty & Wellbeing

Branded beauty, hair care, skin care, prestige beauty and wellbeing consumer products

Revenue

25.3%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

OR.PAELPGHEN3.DE+1

Personal Care

Branded personal care and hygiene (deodorants, skin cleansing, oral care)

Revenue

26.1%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

PGCLRECK.LKMB+2

Home Care

Branded home care (laundry detergents, fabric enhancers, household cleaning and hygiene)

Revenue

23%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

PGHEN3.DERECK.LCL+1

Foods

Branded foods (condiments, cooking aids, mini-meals) and foodservice ingredients (Unilever Food Solutions)

Revenue

25.5%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

NESN.SWKHCMDLZBN.PA+2

Moat Claims

Beauty & Wellbeing

Branded beauty, hair care, skin care, prestige beauty and wellbeing consumer products

Revenue share is based on FY2025 continuing-operations Business Group turnover after the Ice Cream demerger: EUR 12.8bn Beauty & Wellbeing of EUR 50.5bn total continuing turnover.

Oligopoly

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Power-brand portfolio and strong category positions support repeat purchase and premiumisation in hair, skin, and wellbeing.

Brand Trust moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Premium beauty competition intensifies (incumbents and indie brands)
  • Shifts in consumer preferences and influencer-driven fragmentation
  • Private label trade-down during weak consumer demand

Leading indicators

  • Turnover-weighted market share movement (rolling 12 months)
  • Price/mix vs volume growth in the segment
  • Share of sales from new innovations and premium lines

Counterarguments

  • Switching costs are low for most beauty SKUs
  • Digital-first challengers can scale faster than incumbents

Personal Care

Branded personal care and hygiene (deodorants, skin cleansing, oral care)

Revenue share is based on FY2025 continuing-operations Business Group turnover: EUR 13.2bn Personal Care of EUR 50.5bn total continuing turnover.

Oligopoly

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Large portfolio of everyday-use personal care Power Brands with leading positions in key categories supports habitual repurchase.

Brand Trust moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Private label gains in deodorants and cleansing in trade-down cycles
  • Regulatory restrictions on ingredients and claims
  • Price wars led by major peers

Leading indicators

  • Category share in deodorants and skin cleansing
  • Net price/mix vs volume growth
  • Retailer distribution and shelf share for Power Brands

Counterarguments

  • Consumers can switch readily between brands on promotion
  • Retailers can shift visibility toward private label

Home Care

Branded home care (laundry detergents, fabric enhancers, household cleaning and hygiene)

Revenue share is based on FY2025 continuing-operations Business Group turnover: EUR 11.6bn Home Care of EUR 50.5bn total continuing turnover.

Oligopoly

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Leading laundry and cleaning Power Brands support repeat purchase where performance perception matters (stain removal, hygiene, fragrance).

Brand Trust moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Category commoditisation and private label quality improvement
  • Regulatory constraints on formulations (for example, chemicals, packaging)
  • Disruption from new formats (sheets, concentrates)

Leading indicators

  • Share trend in fabric cleaning and home hygiene
  • Innovation adoption (new formats, fragrance platforms)
  • Gross margin stability through commodity cycles

Counterarguments

  • Performance claims can be matched by peers
  • Shelf space and promotions are heavily retailer-controlled

Foods

Branded foods (condiments, cooking aids, mini-meals) and foodservice ingredients (Unilever Food Solutions)

Revenue share is based on FY2025 continuing-operations Business Group turnover: EUR 12.9bn Foods of EUR 50.5bn total continuing turnover.

Competitive

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 3 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Global food Power Brands (notably Knorr and Hellmann's) create consumer pull; Unilever Food Solutions adds credibility and reach in foodservice.

Brand Trust moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Private label share gains in condiments and cooking aids
  • Health and regulatory shifts (salt, sugar, additives) constrain formulations
  • Commodity inflation (oils, eggs) compresses margins

Leading indicators

  • Category share for Knorr and Hellmann's
  • Foodservice recovery and Unilever Food Solutions growth
  • Price/mix vs volume trend

Counterarguments

  • Taste and value are easy to replicate with private label
  • Retailer bargaining power is higher in foods than in beauty

Evidence

sec_filing

Our Power Brands delivered a good performance, with many achieving double-digit growth

Directly supports current demand strength across the Beauty & Wellbeing Power Brand portfolio.

sec_filing

Growth was led by our Power Brands, which accounted for 90% of turnover.

Power Brand concentration and segment growth support a brand-led demand advantage.

sec_filing

Performance was led by our Power Brands, accounting for 82% of turnover.

Power Brand concentration and positive volume growth support a brand-led demand advantage.

sec_filing

Our Power Brands: Hellmann's, Horlicks, Knorr

Identifies the focused Foods brands underlying the brand-trust claim; segment growth was positive but modest in 2025.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Premium beauty competition intensifies (incumbents and indie brands)
  • Shifts in consumer preferences and influencer-driven fragmentation
  • Private label trade-down during weak consumer demand
  • Private label gains in deodorants and cleansing in trade-down cycles
  • Regulatory restrictions on ingredients and claims
  • Price wars led by major peers

Leading indicators

  • Turnover-weighted market share movement (rolling 12 months)
  • Price/mix vs volume growth in the segment
  • Share of sales from new innovations and premium lines
  • Category share in deodorants and skin cleansing
  • Net price/mix vs volume growth
  • Retailer distribution and shelf share for Power Brands

Keep the research going

Created 2025-12-30
Updated 2026-07-12

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.