★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Stock Profile

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) Moat Analysis

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

BMY · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$117.7B
SectorHealthcare
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - General
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Bristol-Myers Squibb is a global biopharmaceutical company selling branded medicines across cardiovascular, oncology, hematology, immunology and neuroscience. Its defensible advantages are mainly product-level patent and regulatory exclusivity on key drugs such as Eliquis, Opdivo/Opdualag, Reblozyl and Sotyktu, plus specialized manufacturing capability in biologics and CAR-T. Durability is uneven: Revlimid and Pomalyst are eroding quickly from generics, Eliquis faces U.S. Medicare price pressure in 2026 and expected U.S. generic entry in 2028, and Orencia was selected for Medicare negotiation beginning in 2028. Formulary access is continuously renegotiated and specialized-drug persistence does not by itself prove switching or procurement inertia, so those moat claims are removed. Sustaining clinical differentiation and access is as important as IP.

Primary segment

Eliquis franchise (apixaban)

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

5 segments · 7 tags

Updated 2026-07-12

Segments

Eliquis franchise (apixaban)

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in NVAF and treatment/prevention of DVT/PE

Revenue

30%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

JNJBAYN.DE4568.T

Immuno-oncology checkpoint inhibitors (Opdivo/Yervoy/Opdualag)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1/CTLA-4/LAG-3) for solid-tumor oncology

Revenue

29.8%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

MRKAZNRHHBY

Hematology (Revlimid/Pomalyst/Reblozyl)

Hematology therapeutics (multiple myeloma regimens; anemia in MDS/beta-thalassemia)

Revenue

16.6%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

JNJAMGNABBV

Immunology (Orencia/Sotyktu)

Immunology therapies for rheumatoid/psoriatic arthritis and plaque psoriasis

Revenue

8.3%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

ABBVJNJAMGNNVS

Other specialty & emerging products (CAR-T, cardiomyopathy, neuroscience, and mature brands)

Specialty pharmaceuticals across cell therapy (CAR-T), cardiomyopathy, neuroscience, oncology, transplantation, and mature brands

Revenue

15.3%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

JNJGILDREGNLLY

Moat Claims

Eliquis franchise (apixaban)

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in NVAF and treatment/prevention of DVT/PE

Revenue share derived from FY2025 'Total Revenues by Product' table; Eliquis FY2025 total revenues were $14.443B of $48.195B total.

Oligopoly

IP Choke Point

Legal

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Patent/regulatory exclusivity protects U.S. sales until a 2028 settlement-based generic entry, while EU generics have begun launching in certain countries before patent/SPC disputes are fully resolved.

IP Choke Point moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Generic entry timing (U.S. 2028; EU earlier in some countries)
  • Government pricing rules and payer rebate pressure
  • Clinical differentiation vs rival DOACs

Leading indicators

  • ANDA/court docket updates for apixaban patents
  • Net price (gross-to-net) trend for Eliquis
  • EU generic penetration by country

Counterarguments

  • DOAC choice is heavily influenced by payer formularies; PBMs can switch preferred products quickly
  • Competitors can win share via contracting or new data in key indications

Immuno-oncology checkpoint inhibitors (Opdivo/Yervoy/Opdualag)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1/CTLA-4/LAG-3) for solid-tumor oncology

Revenue share derived from FY2025 revenues for Opdivo ($10.049B), Opdivo Qvantig ($0.238B), Yervoy ($2.900B) and Opdualag ($1.185B).

Oligopoly

IP Choke Point

Legal

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Core brands are protected by patent/regulatory exclusivity (Opdivo U.S. planning date 2028; Opdualag longer; Yervoy closer to LOE), supporting premium pricing while labels remain differentiated.

IP Choke Point moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Loss of exclusivity for older IO assets (e.g., Yervoy)
  • Clinical trial outcomes or label changes favoring competitors
  • Next-generation IO modalities (bispecifics, ADC combos) shifting standards of care

Leading indicators

  • New indications/label expansions and guideline updates
  • Competitor trial readouts in key tumor types
  • Price/rebate trend in oncology channels

Counterarguments

  • Competitors with larger IO franchises can outspend or out-contract in oncology
  • Rapidly evolving standards of care can flip market share on new data

Capex Knowhow Scale

Supply

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Biologics manufacturing is complex and highly regulated; BMS operates a global manufacturing network and can produce Opdivo internally and via qualified third parties to meet demand.

Capex Knowhow Scale moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Manufacturing quality failures, recalls, or regulatory enforcement
  • Input constraints (specialized materials) or single-source dependencies
  • Biologics biosimilar manufacturing capabilities catching up

Leading indicators

  • FDA/EMA inspection outcomes and warning letters
  • Capacity expansion milestones for biologics/cell therapy sites
  • Reported supply disruptions or backorders

Counterarguments

  • Most large pharma can access biologics manufacturing via internal plants or CMOs; advantage may be incremental
  • Supply capability does not guarantee clinical differentiation or market share

Hematology (Revlimid/Pomalyst/Reblozyl)

Hematology therapeutics (multiple myeloma regimens; anemia in MDS/beta-thalassemia)

Revenue share derived from FY2025 revenues for Revlimid ($2.951B), Pomalyst/Imnovid ($2.733B) and Reblozyl ($2.327B). Q1 FY2026 revenue declined sharply for Revlimid and Pomalyst as generic erosion accelerated.

Competitive

IP Choke Point

Legal

Strength

Strength 2 of 5

Durability

Durability 1 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 3 of 5

Legal exclusivity is mixed and weakening: Revlimid volume-limited U.S. generic licenses ended January 31, 2026; Pomalyst now faces generic erosion; Reblozyl has longer regulatory/patent protection.

IP Choke Point moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Generic/biosimilar entry accelerating price and volume declines
  • Newer modalities in myeloma (CAR-T, bispecifics) displacing IMiDs
  • Payer pressure as multiple alternatives exist

Leading indicators

  • Generic launch/volume data for lenalidomide and pomalidomide
  • NCCN/ESMO guideline shifts and new trial readouts
  • Net sales trajectory by product (Revlimid vs Reblozyl mix)

Counterarguments

  • Much of the franchise is already in decline due to generics; moat may be mostly harvested, not defended
  • Treatment paradigms are moving to newer modalities where BMS is not the leader

Immunology (Orencia/Sotyktu)

Immunology therapies for rheumatoid/psoriatic arthritis and plaque psoriasis

Revenue share derived from FY2025 revenues for Orencia ($3.705B) and Sotyktu ($0.291B).

Competitive

IP Choke Point

Legal

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Orencia retains formulation/additional patents through 2026+ with no known biosimilar on market per company disclosure; Sotyktu has longer patent runway (U.S. 2033 with potential extensions).

IP Choke Point moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Biosimilar entry for Orencia after patent expiry
  • Government-set Medicare pricing for Orencia beginning in 2028
  • High competition and payer step edits in immunology

Leading indicators

  • Biosimilar filings and litigation outcomes for abatacept
  • Sotyktu prescription growth vs rival oral/systemic agents
  • Formulary positioning in commercial and Medicare channels

Counterarguments

  • Immunology markets are highly rebate-driven; payer decisions can override clinical preference
  • Multiple differentiated alternatives reduce the durability of any one brand's position

Other specialty & emerging products (CAR-T, cardiomyopathy, neuroscience, and mature brands)

Specialty pharmaceuticals across cell therapy (CAR-T), cardiomyopathy, neuroscience, oncology, transplantation, and mature brands

Revenue share is the residual of FY2025 total revenues after major franchises; includes Breyanzi, Camzyos, Zeposia, Abecma, Krazati, Augtyro, Cobenfy and mature brands like Sprycel/Abraxane.

Competitive

Capex Knowhow Scale

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

CAR-T and other advanced modalities require specialized manufacturing infrastructure and quality systems; BMS has invested in a multi-site cell therapy network and received FDA approval for a commercial CAR-T facility.

Capex Knowhow Scale moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Manufacturing deviations causing supply interruptions
  • Competitors scaling superior CAR-T products
  • Input shortages (vectors, specialized materials)

Leading indicators

  • Facility buildout/expansion milestones and throughput
  • Regulatory inspection outcomes
  • Commercial CAR-T capacity utilization and lead times

Counterarguments

  • Contract manufacturers can lower entry barriers over time
  • Clinical superiority, not manufacturing alone, determines winner-take-most in CAR-T

IP Choke Point

Legal

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

This portfolio includes newer assets with multi-year exclusivity (e.g., Abecma, Breyanzi, Camzyos, Zeposia) which supports premium specialty pricing while differentiated and protected.

IP Choke Point moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Patent litigation losses or earlier-than-expected generic entry
  • Rapid competitive innovation in specialty niches
  • Reimbursement tightening for high-cost specialty therapies

Leading indicators

  • Patent/SPC litigation updates and Orange Book challenges
  • New specialty product launches and trial readouts
  • Coverage and prior-authorization changes

Counterarguments

  • Specialty markets can shift quickly with new data; exclusivity does not ensure dominance
  • Regulators and payers may limit uptake even when IP is intact

Evidence

sec_filing

...settlement agreements... generic companies... are permitted to launch in 2028...

Anchors the U.S. loss-of-exclusivity timing for the franchise.

sec_filing

In the EU, the apixaban ... patents and related SPCs expire in 2026.

Shows earlier EU patent/SPC expiry vs the U.S.; the 10-K also reports generic manufacturers have begun marketing in certain European countries.

sec_filing

Opdivo (nivolumab) 2028 ... Opdualag ... 2034 ... Yervoy ... 2025.

Shows that exclusivity windows are finite and vary by brand within the IO franchise.

sec_filing

Our IO products, particularly Opdivo, operate in a highly competitive marketplace.

Explains why legal exclusivity alone may not guarantee share; differentiation must be maintained.

sec_filing

Pharmaceutical manufacturing processes are complex, highly regulated...

Supports that scale/know-how in biologics manufacturing is a real capability barrier.

Showing 5 of 15 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Generic entry timing (U.S. 2028; EU earlier in some countries)
  • Government pricing rules and payer rebate pressure
  • Clinical differentiation vs rival DOACs
  • Loss of exclusivity for older IO assets (e.g., Yervoy)
  • Clinical trial outcomes or label changes favoring competitors
  • Next-generation IO modalities (bispecifics, ADC combos) shifting standards of care

Leading indicators

  • ANDA/court docket updates for apixaban patents
  • Net price (gross-to-net) trend for Eliquis
  • EU generic penetration by country
  • New indications/label expansions and guideline updates
  • Competitor trial readouts in key tumor types
  • Price/rebate trend in oncology channels

Keep the research going

Created 2025-12-22
Updated 2026-07-12

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.