FinancialData.net vs Fiscal.ai comparison

Both platforms cover Data APIs, APIs & SDKs, Calendar, Dividends, Splits, Financials, Insider Data, Institutional Data, and ETF Holdings workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Both FinancialData.net and Fiscal.ai keep freemium access with optional paid upgrades, so you can trial each platform before committing.

Both FinancialData.net and Fiscal.ai prioritize web or desktop access. Investors wanting a mobile-first workflow may need to rely on responsive web views.

FinancialData.net differentiates itself with REST API for real-time and historical data across equities (US + international), ETFs/funds, indices, derivatives, OTC, crypto and FX., API auth via query parameter `?key=API_KEY` (or `&key=`) and supports JSON or CSV output formats., and Market data endpoints include end-of-day prices, one-minute intraday history, and "latest prices"; real-time quote endpoints are documented as Premium subscription features., whereas Fiscal.ai stands out for Modern web-based research terminal with dashboards, customizable watchlists, portfolio stats, and fundamental charting for 100,000+ global stocks, ETFs, and funds., Deep fundamental coverage: 10–20+ years of annual and 6–40+ quarters of quarterly financials by plan, with ratios, common-size statements, and adjusted metrics., and Rich segment & KPI database across ~2,300 large-cap names, including company-specific business KPIs that are hard to aggregate manually..