★ BEST INVESTING TOOLS COMPARISON ★
VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
Tool comparison edition
Tool Comparison
Fiscal.ai vs InsideArbitrage
Pick Fiscal.ai if
Fiscal.ai
Free • From $39/mo · Web · API
- You'd rather start free and only pay if you outgrow it
- You want the cheaper way in: plans start at $39/mo instead of $100/mo
- You want an API so you can script or automate things
Pick InsideArbitrage if
InsideArbitrage
From $100/mo · Web
- You care about corporate actions & special situations, regulatory filings monitoring, and videos, things Fiscal.ai doesn't offer
Skip both if: Neither one clicks with how you research; there are strong third options.
See alternativesOutbound links may include affiliate or sponsor codes.
Our take
The bottom line
Fiscal.ai and InsideArbitrage cover a lot of the same ground (13 shared categories, including screeners, data visualizations, and portfolio), so for the basics you won't go far wrong with either. Fiscal.ai simply does more: 29 categories to InsideArbitrage's 18, including stock ideas, stock comparison, and ETF analysis. InsideArbitrage counters by keeping things simpler.
What readers say
Fiscal.ai
Vote once to reveal the community verdict.
InsideArbitrage
Vote once to reveal the community verdict.
Key differences at a glance
- Free plan
- Fiscal.ai
- Cheaper paid plan
- Fiscal.ai$39/mo vs $100/mo
- Free trial
- Fiscal.ai7 days
- Broader coverage
- Fiscal.ai29 vs 18 categories
- API access
- Fiscal.ai
- Global coverage
- Fiscal.ai
See for yourself
How they stack up
The side-by-side table: pricing, platforms, data, and coverage at a glance.ShowHide
How they stack up
The side-by-side table: pricing, platforms, data, and coverage at a glance.| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing & plans | ||
Starting price | Free • From $39/mo | From $100/mo |
Free tier | Yes | No |
Free trial | 7 days | — |
Plan limits | 37 limits: Terminal - Free: financials history (annual): 10, Terminal - Free: financials history (quarterly): 6 +35 more | — |
| Platforms & access | ||
Web app | Yes | Yes |
Mobile app | No | No |
API access | Yes | No |
Broker sync | No | No |
Integrations | MCP, Claude Connector +7 more | — |
| Audience & fit | ||
Experience level | Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced | Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced |
Best for | Retail Traders, Pro Retail +11 more | — |
Categories covered | 29 | 18 |
Regions | North America, Europe, APAC, LatAm, Middle East, Africa | North America |
| Data & capabilities | ||
Data quality | 3 signals: Latency: Real-time, 15-min Delayed, and End of Day, Granularity: EOD +1 more | 4 signals: Latency: Real-time and End of Day, Granularity: EOD +2 more |
Data partners | 5 partners: Fiscal.ai Data Feed, S&P Global Market Intelligence +3 more | — |
Capabilities | 6 signals: Custom formulas, Universe builder +4 more | Universe builder |
Security | SOC2 and Status page | — |
| Try it | Visit Fiscal.ai | Visit InsideArbitrage |
Where each one shines
What Fiscal.ai and InsideArbitrage each do best.ShowHide
Where each one shines
What Fiscal.ai and InsideArbitrage each do best.What Fiscal.ai does best
- Research coverage for global stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, and funds through dashboards, watchlists, portfolio views, visualizations, fundamentals, estimates, transcripts, filings, news, and event data.
- AI Copilot, AI summaries, and AI-generated reports to speed up earnings review, filing review, peer comparison, financial analysis, and company research.
- Analysis of fundamentals, ratios, standardized financials, as-reported data, adjusted metrics, segment data, KPIs, analyst estimates, revisions, ratings, and price targets.
- Packaged Fiscal Skills in MCP clients for financial pulls, three-statement models, segment and KPI work, comp sets, valuation, industry reports, ownership activity, filing discovery, quality scores, and earnings reactions.
- Trace research back to source filings, transcripts, slides, company news, investor-relations material, and source-to-filing images or PDFs where supported.
What InsideArbitrage does best
- Tracking announced merger-arbitrage deals with spread context, calendars, deal updates, Deals in the Works, and post-mortem research.
- Tracked-deal workflows to filter relevant news, SEC filings, and tweets around the active-deal symbols a premium user follows.
- Research coverage for insider activity with Insider Weekends, cluster buys, buys near highs, flip-floppers, top-performing insiders, sector heat maps, and premium insider screens.
- Monitoring buyback situations through daily buyback announcements, searchable buyback history, Buyback Wednesdays, and Double Dipper screens that combine insider buying with repurchases.
- Monitoring spinoffs, completed spinoffs, Spinsider ideas, CVR deals, CVR outcomes, tender offers, reverse splits, activist campaigns, C-suite transitions, and M&A news feeds.
Every detail we compared
Every tracked attribute for Fiscal.ai and InsideArbitrage, side by side.ShowHide
Every detail we compared
Every tracked attribute for Fiscal.ai and InsideArbitrage, side by side.| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Coverage & fit | ||
Asset types | StocksETFsMutual FundsFunds | StocksETFs |
Experience | BeginnerIntermediateAdvanced | BeginnerIntermediateAdvanced |
Target audience | Retail TradersPro RetailInstitutional InvestorsAnalystsQuants/DevelopersLong-term InvestorsValue InvestorsGrowth Investors+5 more | Not specified |
Regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLatAmMiddle EastAfrica | North America |
Coverage details | Identifiers: Ticker, CUSIP, ISIN, and FIGI | Countries: USExchanges: XNYS, XNAS, and ARCXIdentifiers: Ticker and CIK |
| Data | ||
Data freshness | Real-time15-min DelayedEnd of Day | Real-timeEnd of Day |
Data granularity | EOD | EOD |
Data partners | Fiscal.ai Data FeedS&P Global Market IntelligenceMorningstarYChartsPerplexity | Not specified |
| Access & integrations | ||
API protocols | REST | Not specified |
API auth & delivery | Auth: APIKeyWebhooks50 req/minDocs | Not specified |
Import methods | Manual | Manual |
Integrations | MCPClaude ConnectorChatGPTCodex CLICursorVS Code CopilotGemini CLIPerplexity+1 more | Not specified |
Export formats | CSVImagePDF | Not specified |
| Plans & trust | ||
Security & compliance | SOC2Status page | Not specified |
Capability signals | Custom formulasUniverse builderPerformance attributionPortfolio attributionCitation pinningAI summaries: Filings, Transcripts, and News | Universe builder |
Vendor & support | Stratosphere Technology Inc.Country: CanadaFounded 2021Support: Email | InsideArbitrageCountry: USSupport: Email |
Curation ratings | Methodology 5/5Reliability 4/5UX 5/5 | Methodology 3/5Reliability 3/5UX 4/5 |
Green tags are exclusive to that tool in this comparison.
What you'll actually pay
Plans, billing, trials, and per-month pricing for both tools.ShowHide
What you'll actually pay
Plans, billing, trials, and per-month pricing for both tools.| Tier | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Free“Terminal - Free”financials history (annual): 10 · financials history (quarterly): 6 · +8 more | — |
| Entry paid plan | $39/mo“Terminal - Pro (Monthly)”financials history (annual): 15 · financials history (quarterly): 20 · +10 more | $100/mo“Premium – Annual” |
| Tier 2 | $199/mo“Terminal - Enterprise (Monthly)”financials history (annual): 20+ · financials history (quarterly): 40+ · +10 more | $150/mo“Premium – Monthly” |
| Tier 3 | — | $300/mo“IA Professional – Annual” |
| Top plan | — | $400/mo“IA Professional (4 seats)” |
| Custom / enterprise | Contact sales“API - Paid” | — |
| Free trial | 7 days | — |
Questions we keep getting
What's the difference between Fiscal.ai and InsideArbitrage?
Fiscal.ai leans toward stock ideas, screeners, and stock comparison, while InsideArbitrage puts more weight on news, alerts, and calendar. They overlap in 13 categories, so for most people it comes down to workflow preference and price.
Is Fiscal.ai or InsideArbitrage free to use?
Fiscal.ai has a free tier, so you can get started without paying anything. InsideArbitrage is paid-only. If budget matters, start with Fiscal.ai and see how far it takes you before opening your wallet.
Does Fiscal.ai or InsideArbitrage have an API?
Fiscal.ai has an API for programmatic access and custom integrations. InsideArbitrage doesn't, so you're working through its interface.
Should I choose Fiscal.ai or InsideArbitrage?
It depends on what you're after. Pick Fiscal.ai if stock ideas and stock comparison matter to you; go with InsideArbitrage if you'd rather have corporate actions & special situations and regulatory filings monitoring. And if you only need the basics both share, let price decide.
What asset classes do Fiscal.ai and InsideArbitrage cover?
Both cover stocks and ETFs. Fiscal.ai also handles mutual funds and funds.
Do Fiscal.ai and InsideArbitrage offer real-time data?
Yes, both serve real-time market data, so either works when timing matters.
Which covers international markets: Fiscal.ai or InsideArbitrage?
Fiscal.ai has documented international coverage (North America, Europe, APAC, LatAm, and more), so it's the safer bet if you hold non-US stocks. InsideArbitrage is more region-specific, mainly North America.
Can I export data from Fiscal.ai and InsideArbitrage?
Fiscal.ai exports to CSV. InsideArbitrage is stingier about getting data out.
Which has a better stock screener: Fiscal.ai or InsideArbitrage?
Both Fiscal.ai and InsideArbitrage include stock screeners, and they differ more in interface than raw power; try both and see which one clicks for you.
Can I track my portfolio with Fiscal.ai or InsideArbitrage?
Yes, both do portfolio tracking: holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.
Feedback
Spot stale pricing, missing features, or a comparison that feels off? Send feedback on the verdict, table, alternatives, or recommendation.
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.