Fiscal.ai vs Letters and Reviews comparison

Fiscal.ai focuses on Screeners, Stock Comparison, and Data Visualizations while Letters and Reviews specializes in Stock Ideas, 13F, and Blogs. They overlap in 2 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both Fiscal.ai and Letters and Reviews offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Fiscal.ai provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. Letters and Reviews doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose Fiscal.ai if you need Modern web-based research terminal with dashboards, customizable watchlists, portfolio stats, and fundamental charting for 100,000+ global stocks, ETFs, and funds., and Deep fundamental coverage: 10–20+ years of annual and 6–40+ quarters of quarterly financials by plan, with ratios, common-size statements, and adjusted metrics.. Go with Letters and Reviews if Quarterly **Fund Manager Letters** pages with the fund name, date, and a "Stocks Mentioned" column (tickers link out for quick lookup)., and Quarterly **13-F pages** the author reads, with many entries including holdings tables and position-change flags (e.g., NEW / Sold Out / % of portfolio). better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. Fiscal.ai also includes Mutual Funds, and Funds.

Fiscal.ai offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Letters and Reviews uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Fiscal.ai supports data exports to CSV, Image, and PDF. Letters and Reviews has more limited export options.

Fiscal.ai includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. Letters and Reviews focuses on other analytical tools.

Fiscal.ai offers portfolio tracking features. Letters and Reviews is more focused on research and analysis.