OTC Markets vs Reflexivity comparison

OTC Markets focuses on Screeners, News, and Data APIs while Reflexivity specializes in Screeners, Quant, and Performance Attribution. They overlap in 3 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

OTC Markets offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Reflexivity requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with OTC Markets and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

OTC Markets is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose OTC Markets if you need Public website for OTCQX, OTCQB, OTCID and Pink Limited markets with stock & bond quotes, trade prices, charts, financials and company news., and Stock Screener (web UI) for OTC securities (page titled “OTC Markets Stock Screener”).. Go with Reflexivity if Institutional-grade AI research environment with verified data from S&P Global, Refinitiv Datastream, Nasdaq, and Cboe-all included without the need for separate data contracts., and Deep Research agent that can write and execute Python, run backtests, generate Excel models, export code and data, and produce publication-ready reports. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and Bonds. Reflexivity adds coverage for ETFs, Commodities, and Currencies.

Reflexivity offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. OTC Markets uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Reflexivity supports data exports to Excel. OTC Markets has more limited export options.

Both OTC Markets and Reflexivity include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Reflexivity offers portfolio tracking features. OTC Markets is more focused on research and analysis.