Global Factor Data (JKP Factors) Alternatives & Competitors

Checking

Replacement verdicts

Global Factor Data (JKP Factors) logo

Alternatives to Global Factor Data (JKP Factors)

Curated replacements grouped by fit, tradeoffs, pricing flexibility, and platform access. Use this list to decide which Global Factor Data (JKP Factors) competitor is worth testing first.

Looking for a Global Factor Data (JKP Factors) replacement? We've profiled 20 alternatives by workflow fit, pricing flexibility, caveats, and platform access. Whether you need a free option to trial, mobile-ready workflows, or API integrations, this list helps you choose what to test first.

Disclosure: outbound links may include affiliate or sponsor links

Which Alternative Should You Use?

Portfolio123 logo

Portfolio123

Closest replacement

Best for: Rules-based investors looking for point-in-time stock and ETF simulations.

  • Portfolio123 best matches the base workflow on quant research, factor screening, and financial data API.
  • Portfolio123 keeps the replacement test in the same free-access lane. Free access caveat: signup required and Free Manage module is separate from paid Research, API, and DataMiner access..

Watch for: Advanced research is paid: Free Manage covers portfolio tracking. Time-limited access covers screener and backtesting use before a paid Research plan, while API and DataMiner require separate paid access.

GuruFocus logo

GuruFocus

Best audience fit

Best for: Value investors looking for long historical fundamentals, GF Score, GF Value, and guru/institutional holdings.

  • GuruFocus best matches the base workflow on financial data API, strategy backtesting, and charting and technical analysis.
  • GuruFocus keeps the replacement test in the same free-access lane. Free access caveat: signup required and A free account has limited access..

Watch for: Paid access is region and tier dependent: Annual paid memberships, region add-ons, API plans, and pay-as-you-go API credits.

FactorsToday logo

FactorsToday

Strong runner-up

Best for: Quantitative researchers studying factor returns, stock loadings, correlations, and attribution.

  • FactorsToday best matches the base workflow on quant research, financial data API, and strategy backtesting.
  • FactorsToday keeps the replacement test in the same free-access lane. Free access caveat: Public dashboards and API documentation can be opened without signing in..

Watch for: Pricing not published: The site exposes public tools and a no-key API but publishes no long-term access or commercial pricing policy.

PortfoliosLab logo

PortfoliosLab

Strong runner-up

Best for: Long-term investors who want portfolio backtests, risk metrics, correlations, optimization, and screeners in one web service.

  • PortfoliosLab best matches the base workflow on strategy backtesting, charting and technical analysis, and screening and idea generation.
  • PortfoliosLab keeps the replacement test in the same free-access lane. Free access caveat: signup required and Free plan includes 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations/month, and 5 years of history..

Watch for: Free tier is small: Free access is capped at 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations per month, and 5 years of history.

Detailed Alternatives

01
Portfolio123 logo

Portfolio123

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Closest replacementWorkflow overlap 100%

Bottom line: Rules-based investors looking for point-in-time stock and ETF simulations.

Replacement
Drop-in replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Portfolio123 best matches the base workflow on quant research, factor screening, and financial data API.
  • Portfolio123 matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Analysts, and Students/Researchers.
  • You gain Screeners, Stock Ideas, Scores, and Valuation Models.

Watch out

  • Material switch gaps: missing Other access, does not clearly cover historical market data and research reports, and less aligned with active traders.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on historical market data and research reports.
  • Advanced research is paid: Free Manage covers portfolio tracking. Time-limited access covers screener and backtesting use before a paid Research plan, while API and DataMiner require separate paid access.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free Manage module is separate from paid Research, API, and DataMiner access., and General registration offers 30 days of screener and backtesting access without a payment card..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsQuantData VisualizationsFactor Exposure
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 100%

Bottom line: Quantitative researchers studying factor returns, stock loadings, correlations, and attribution.

Replacement
Drop-in replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • FactorsToday best matches the base workflow on quant research, financial data API, and strategy backtesting.
  • FactorsToday matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Analysts, and Advanced.
  • You gain Screeners, Stock Comparison, Performance Attribution, and Risk Metrics.

Watch out

  • Material switch gaps: missing Other access, does not clearly cover historical market data, factor screening, and research reports, and less aligned with Students/Researchers and active traders.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on historical market data, factor screening, and research reports.
  • Pricing not published: The site exposes public tools and a no-key API but publishes no long-term access or commercial pricing policy.
  • Free-plan limits: Public dashboards and API documentation can be opened without signing in., The API does not currently require a key and is limited to ten requests per second per IP address., and No paid pricing table or durable free-access commitment is published..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsQuantData VisualizationsFactor Exposure
03
GuruFocus logo

GuruFocus

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 75%

Bottom line: Value investors looking for long historical fundamentals, GF Score, GF Value, and guru/institutional holdings.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and Other
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • GuruFocus best matches the base workflow on financial data API, strategy backtesting, and charting and technical analysis.
  • GuruFocus matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Analysts, and Students/Researchers.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Screeners, ETF Screeners, and Top Analysts.

Watch out

  • Material switch gaps: missing Factor Exposure workflows and does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Paid access is region and tier dependent: Annual paid memberships, region add-ons, API plans, and pay-as-you-go API credits.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, A free account has limited access., and Free members have limited portfolio capacity..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsQuantData Visualizations
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 100%

Bottom line: Long-term investors who want portfolio backtests, risk metrics, correlations, optimization, and screeners in one web service.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • PortfoliosLab best matches the base workflow on strategy backtesting, charting and technical analysis, and screening and idea generation.
  • PortfoliosLab matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Analysts, and Advanced.
  • You gain Portfolio, Watchlist, Backtesting, and Correlation.

Watch out

  • Material switch gaps: missing Other access, does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening, and less aligned with Students/Researchers and active traders.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Free tier is small: Free access is capped at 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations per month, and 5 years of history.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free plan includes 1 watchlist, 100 symbols, 15 holdings per portfolio, 10 calculations/month, and 5 years of history., and Annual billing works out to $8.33 per month for Plus, $20.83 for Pro, and $75 for Max..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsQuantData VisualizationsFactor Exposure
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 75%

Bottom line: Investors, analysts, and funds using alternative data such as search, web traffic, app usage, social, news, reviews, and transcripts to forecast company KPIs before earnings.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web and Other
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • TickerTrends best matches the base workflow on financial data API, research reports, and charting and technical analysis.
  • TickerTrends matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Analysts, and Students/Researchers.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Screeners, Stock Comparison, and Backtesting.

Watch out

  • Material switch gaps: missing Factor Exposure workflows, does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening, and less aligned with active traders.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Alternative data is noisy: Search, social, traffic, and app signals are proxies for business performance. Users need modeling discipline, validation, and company-specific KPI context.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, TickerTrends Core is $998 per year after a seven-day trial and carries a 30-day money-back guarantee., and KPI Tracking Suite is custom priced with a trial available by request..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsQuantData Visualizations
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 75%

Bottom line: Active investors and developers looking for market data, news clustering, social sentiment, institutional flow, insider trades, and AI analysis in one beta workspace.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • SentiSense best matches the base workflow on financial data API, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • SentiSense matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Analysts, and Students/Researchers.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Screeners, Watchlist, and News.

Watch out

  • Material switch gaps: missing Other access, missing Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Beta product with plan limits: Free and PRO quotas are now published, but the product remains young and users should verify endpoint-level access before depending on it in production.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free plan includes 1,000 API requests/month and limited market-intelligence access., and PRO is listed at $15/month or $144/year with unlimited monthly API and MCP calls at up to 300 requests per minute..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsQuantData Visualizations
07
ORTEX logo

ORTEX

Hands-on Tested
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 75%

Bottom line: Active traders and analysts tracking short interest, securities lending, options flow, insider trades, stock scores, and trading signals.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • ORTEX best matches the base workflow on financial data API, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • ORTEX matches the base audience on Advanced, active traders, and quants and developers.
  • You gain Short Interest, Insider Data, Index Rebalancing, and Money Flow.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Best data is paid: Free accounts have limited access. Basic, Advanced, and API tiers unlock deeper datasets and workflow capacity.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free account has limited access., and The free account needs no credit card..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsQuantData Visualizations
08
Portfolio Visualizer logo

Portfolio Visualizer

Hands-on Tested
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 75%

Bottom line: DIY investors and advisors needing portfolio backtests, Monte Carlo analysis, optimization, correlations, factor regression, and fund analytics from a web tool.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Portfolio Visualizer best matches the base workflow on quant research, factor screening, and strategy backtesting.
  • Portfolio Visualizer matches the base audience on Advanced, quants and developers, and professional analysts.
  • You gain Backtesting, Monte Carlo, Correlation, and Risk Metrics.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing APIs & Data Feeds workflows, and does not clearly cover historical market data, financial data API, and research reports.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on historical market data, financial data API, and research reports.
  • Free tier is constrained: The free tier limits portfolio size/history and excludes current-year/YTD results, so serious workflows usually need Basic or Pro.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free tier supports portfolios with up to 15 assets and limited history., and Basic is listed at $30/month billed annually..

Shared coverage

QuantData VisualizationsFactor Exposure
09
LIQN logo

LIQN

Hands-on Tested
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 75%

Bottom line: Investors who think in factors, themes, regimes, and catalysts rather than starting from a conventional ticker screener.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • LIQN best matches the base workflow on quant research, factor screening, and charting and technical analysis.
  • LIQN matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Analysts, and Advanced.
  • You gain Money Flow, Risk Metrics, Watchlist, and Short Interest.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing APIs & Data Feeds workflows, and does not clearly cover historical market data, financial data API, and research reports.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on historical market data, financial data API, and research reports.
  • Roadmap features are not current capabilities: Portfolio Risk is registered as a mocked preview in the current web app, so it is not counted as a live capability.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Current free access requires an account., and No payment card is required..

Shared coverage

QuantData VisualizationsFactor Exposure
10
Perplexity Finance logo

Perplexity Finance

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 50%

Bottom line: Users looking for cited AI answers over finance pages, filings, news, charts, watchlists, screeners, ownership data, and earnings documents.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Perplexity Finance best matches the base workflow on financial data API, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • Perplexity Finance matches the base audience on Analysts, Students/Researchers, and Advanced.
  • You gain Screeners, Watchlist, News, and Calendar.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing Quant and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • AI answer quality still needs review: Perplexity cites sources, but investment conclusions, calculations, and data joins should be verified before use.
  • Free-plan limits: Free consumer plan includes limited Pro searches., Pro is listed locally at $20/month and Max at $200/month for consumer access., and Agent API finance_search is billed at $0.005 per invocation, or $5 per 1,000 invocations, with model tokens billed separately..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsData Visualizations
11
TipRanks logo

TipRanks

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 50%

Bottom line: Retail investors looking for analyst consensus, expert rankings, Smart Score, news sentiment, and stock ideas.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • TipRanks best matches the base workflow on financial data API, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • TipRanks matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Analysts, and Advanced.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Top Analysts, Screeners, and ETF Screeners.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing Quant and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Best tools are paid: Premium and Ultimate gate Smart Portfolio, Smart Score, expert/insider/hedge-fund tools, exports, and higher MCP quotas.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free/Basic MCP OAuth quota is 10 tool calls per month., and Free API-key tier is limited to 10 requests per minute and 50 requests per month..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsData Visualizations
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 50%

Bottom line: Nordic and European investors looking for a fundamentals-rich screener, reports, owner data, technical charts, and dividend research.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Börsdata best matches the base workflow on financial data API, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • Börsdata matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Analysts, and Students/Researchers.
  • You gain Screeners, Stock Ideas, Index Rebalancing, and Watchlist.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing Quant and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Best value is Nordic-first: Global coverage exists on higher tiers, but Börsdata is strongest for Nordic equities and Nordic ownership/insider workflows.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free account has limited access., and Full data requires Premium, Pro, Pro+, or Enterprise..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsData Visualizations
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 75%

Bottom line: ETF investors and institutions that need global screening, comparison, portfolio analysis, and factor or ESG data.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Trackinsight best matches the base workflow on factor screening, financial data API, and charting and technical analysis.
  • Trackinsight matches the base audience on Analysts, Advanced, and quants and developers.
  • You gain ETF Screeners, ETF Comparison, ETF Analysis, and ETF Factors.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing Stocks coverage, and missing Quant workflows.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and research reports.
  • ETF-only focus: Trackinsight is built for ETF/ETP research and data services, not single-stock fundamentals, options, or brokerage execution.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, A free Essentials account is required to save lists and create up to two portfolios., and Full Portfolio Insights is included with Enterprise..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsData VisualizationsFactor Exposure
14
okama logo

okama

Hands-on Tested
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 75%

Bottom line: Technical users who want a free, open-source Python toolkit for portfolio optimization, risk metrics, Monte Carlo, and historical market or macro data.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • okama best matches the base workflow on quant research, historical market data, and strategy backtesting.
  • okama matches the base audience on Advanced and quants and developers.
  • You gain Portfolio, Correlation, Backtesting, and Risk Metrics.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover factor screening, financial data API, and research reports.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on factor screening, financial data API, and research reports.
  • Developer-oriented workflow: okama is designed for Python, API, and widget workflows. Nontechnical investors may find a hosted portfolio tracker easier to use.
  • Free-plan limits: Open-source Python library and free API access to end-of-day historical market data and macroeconomic indicators. and Public documentation currently describes okama 2.3.0..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsQuantData Visualizations
15
ETF Insider logo

ETF Insider

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 75%

Bottom line: ETF and mutual fund investors needing holdings look-through, overlap, concentration, correlation, factor exposure, and efficient-frontier style portfolio views.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • ETF Insider best matches the base workflow on factor screening, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • ETF Insider matches the base audience on Advanced, quants and developers, and professional analysts.
  • You gain ETF Screeners, Risk Metrics, Portfolio, and Correlation.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing Quant workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and financial data API.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and financial data API.
  • U.S.-listed asset focus: Coverage is strongest for US-listed ETFs, mutual funds, and stocks. non-US assets outside US listings and crypto are out of scope.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free plan is listed at $0/month with up to 4 saved portfolios and limited full holdings data., and Pro is listed at $14/month with unlimited full holdings data, Excel export, and unlimited saved portfolios..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsData VisualizationsFactor Exposure
16
TradingView logo

TradingView

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 50%

Bottom line: Traders and investors looking for charting, alerts, screeners, and market coverage across many asset classes.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • TradingView best matches the base workflow on strategy backtesting, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • TradingView matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Advanced, and active traders.
  • You gain Screeners, ETF Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Stock Comparison.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing APIs & Data Feeds and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Real-time market data can require add-ons: Optional real-time quote subscriptions and exchange-specific data fees.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Basic tier limits charts per tab, indicators, alerts, watchlists, and historical bars., and Some real-time exchange data is sold separately from platform plans..

Shared coverage

QuantData Visualizations
Strong workflow fitWorkflow overlap 75%

Bottom line: Systematic traders who want AFL scripting, charting, scanning, optimization, Monte Carlo analysis, and portfolio backtesting on Windows.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Paid-only mismatch
Free tier
No
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced

Why switch

  • AmiBroker best matches the base workflow on quant research, strategy backtesting, and charting and technical analysis.
  • AmiBroker matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Advanced, and active traders.
  • You gain Screeners, Backtesting, Monte Carlo, and Risk Metrics.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Web and Other access, missing Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover historical market data, factor screening, and financial data API.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on historical market data, factor screening, and financial data API.
  • Windows desktop workflow: AmiBroker is a Windows desktop application. It does not provide a native web, macOS, or mobile workflow.
  • Free-plan limits: Trial-only access, Standard costs $299, Professional costs $379, and Ultimate Pack Pro costs $499 before applicable tax., and New licenses include 24 months of upgrades, email support, and maintenance..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsQuantData Visualizations
18
Uncle Stock logo

Uncle Stock

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 50%

Bottom line: Value and long-term investors screening global companies by financial statements, ratios, scores, and valuation models.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Uncle Stock best matches the base workflow on financial data API, strategy backtesting, and charting and technical analysis.
  • Uncle Stock matches the base audience on Advanced, active traders, and quants and developers.
  • You gain Screeners, Backtesting, Financials, and Valuation Models.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing Quant and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • API is Gold-gated and capped: The JSON Search API requires Gold and is capped at 10 calls per minute and 300 calls per month unless the vendor raises the limit.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Subscription page lists Bronze at $20/month or $130/year, Silver at $35/month or $210/year, and Gold at $60/month or $350/year., and The page says Gold includes CSV export with max 300 calls/month and unlimited MCP stock searches/day versus 5/day on the free tier..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsData Visualizations
19
Fiscal.ai logo

Fiscal.ai

Analyst PickHands-on Tested
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 50%

Bottom line: Investors who want AI-assisted company research backed by financials, estimates, transcripts, filings, and dashboards.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • Fiscal.ai best matches the base workflow on financial data API, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • Fiscal.ai matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Analysts, and Students/Researchers.
  • You gain Stock Ideas, Screeners, Stock Comparison, and Portfolio.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing Quant and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Free access is limited: The free API is limited to 100 companies, 50 requests per minute, and 250 requests per day. Deeper history, exports, and some datasets require paid plans.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Free terminal access has dashboard, history, event, and AI prompt limits., and Free API access covers 100 companies, 50 requests per minute, and 250 requests per day..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsData Visualizations
Best free-tier fitWorkflow overlap 50%

Bottom line: Analysts and teams looking for a customizable financial workspace that connects their own data, vendors, dashboards, and AI agents.

Replacement
Partial replacement
Pricing fit
Free-plan match
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Assets
Stocks
Experience
Advanced
Plans
Free

Why switch

  • OpenBB best matches the base workflow on financial data API, charting and technical analysis, and fundamental research.
  • OpenBB matches the base audience on Quants/Developers, Analysts, and Students/Researchers.
  • You gain Sheets / Excel Add-ins, Custom Dashboards, AI Research, and AI Chat.

Watch out

  • Major switch gaps: missing Other access, missing Quant and Factor Exposure workflows, and does not clearly cover quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Avoid as a full replacement if you rely on quant research, historical market data, and factor screening.
  • Does not provide production market data: OpenBB says Workspace includes a limited FMP-powered sandbox, but organizations connect their own datasets for production workflows.
  • Free-plan limits: Signup required, Community Edition is free for individuals., and OpenBB Copilot is limited to 20 queries per day on Community..

Shared coverage

APIs & Data FeedsData Visualizations

What This Shortlist Tells You

Portfolio123 is the closest drop-in replacement with overlapping coverage in APIs & Data Feeds, Quant, and Data Visualizations while adding Screeners and Stock Ideas coverage and Build multifactor ranking systems, stock and ETF screens, and rules-based strategies with point-in-time data. and Run backtests for US, Canadian, and European equities with custom universes, buy and sell rules, position sizing, hedging, slippage, and commissions. features (workflow overlap ~100%).

Free tiers remain available through Portfolio123, FactorsToday, GuruFocus, PortfoliosLab, TickerTrends, SentiSense, ORTEX, Portfolio Visualizer, LIQN, Perplexity Finance, TipRanks, Börsdata, Trackinsight, okama, ETF Insider, TradingView, Uncle Stock, Fiscal.ai, and OpenBB for side-by-side testing.

Need mobile access? GuruFocus, ORTEX, and Perplexity Finance bring phone-ready workflows that Global Factor Data (JKP Factors) lacks.

Round out your stack with new coverage areas like Screeners, Stock Ideas, Scores, and Valuation Models.

Coverage Snapshot

Where alternatives already align

Most shared categories across the top matches.

Data Visualizations×20APIs & Data Feeds×17Quant×12Factor Exposure×7

New angles introduced

Categories the alternatives add beyond Global Factor Data (JKP Factors).

Screeners+15AI Research+12Watchlist+12Backtesting+11Portfolio+11News+10Calendar+9Correlation+9

Access & Pricing

Free options

19/20

19 of 20 alternatives keep a free tier for trials.

Mobile ready

6/20

6 alternatives bring native mobile access.

API availability

16/20

16 of the shortlisted tools expose API endpoints for automation-heavy workflows.

Quality checks

8 starred / 12 tested

8 tools are flagged as analyst picks; 12 have been hands-on tested.

Avg. coverage overlap

70%

Average percentage of categories shared with the base tool.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the best alternatives to Global Factor Data (JKP Factors)?

Global Factor Data (JKP Factors) users most often consider Portfolio123, FactorsToday, and GuruFocus as their go-to alternatives.

Which alternatives keep a free tier?

Portfolio123, FactorsToday, GuruFocus, PortfoliosLab, TickerTrends, SentiSense, ORTEX, Portfolio Visualizer, LIQN, Perplexity Finance, TipRanks, Börsdata, Trackinsight, okama, ETF Insider, TradingView, Uncle Stock, Fiscal.ai, and OpenBB offer a free plan or trial option, making them easy to test before committing to a paid subscription.

Which workflows do the top Global Factor Data (JKP Factors) alternatives cover?

Expect deep coverage across APIs & Data Feeds, Data Visualizations, Factor Exposure, and Quant, so you can port most Global Factor Data (JKP Factors) workflows without much friction.

Keep Exploring

Information

About Me

Hey! Thanks for stopping by. I'm an independent investor with a soft spot for coding and the stock market - especially value investing (as you can probably tell from the tools I've collected here, haha). Hopefully you'll find something useful or interesting along the way.

Find me here:

Got questions or suggestions? I'm all ears!

Missing a Tool?

Discovered a gem I don't have here yet? Drop the link below and I'll check it out ASAP. Tagging me on X works too! Can't wait to see what you've found!

OR

Got ideas for new features?

Suggest on X

Prefer email? Reach me at support@findmymoat.com

Starred Tools

These are my top picks. Tools I've tested thoroughly and found to be excellent. They do their job really well, and I use them a lot. If you're not already familiar with them, I highly recommend checking them out.

Tested Tools

These are tools I've tried and found to be solid, but not standout. Think of them as passing an initial quality screen: worth exploring, though not all will be exceptional.

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.