FactorsToday vs Reflexivity comparison

FactorsToday focuses on Screeners, Quant, and Data Visualizations while Reflexivity specializes in Screeners, Quant, and Performance Attribution. They overlap in 8 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Both platforms require a paid subscription to access their full feature set. Compare the pricing details above to find the best value for your needs.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose FactorsToday if you need Live dashboards for "Extreme Factor Moves" and "Extreme Factor Pairs" using z-scores across multiple time windows., and Factor Screener (filter by timeframe/return/direction/name) and Stock Screener (filter by stock type, factor criteria, and model-fit metrics like R^2/Adj R^2), with CSV export.. Go with Reflexivity if Institutional-grade AI research environment with verified data from S&P Global, Refinitiv Datastream, Nasdaq, and Cboe-all included without the need for separate data contracts., and Deep Research agent that can write and execute Python, run backtests, generate Excel models, export code and data, and produce publication-ready reports. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. FactorsToday also includes Mutual Funds, and Closed-End Funds. Reflexivity adds coverage for Bonds, Commodities, and Currencies.

Yes, both platforms provide real-time market data. This makes either suitable for active trading strategies where timing matters.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (Excel). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

Both FactorsToday and Reflexivity include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.