VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Monday, December 29, 2025

Stock Comparison

Kao Corporation vs Tyler Technologies, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Kao Corporation

4452 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$18.5B
SectorConsumer
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
60/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Kao Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 4452 analysis

Tyler Technologies, Inc.

TYL · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$19.9B
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
66/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Tyler Technologies, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View TYL analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Tyler Technologies, Inc. leads (66 / 100 vs 60 / 100 for Kao Corporation).
  • Segment focus: Kao Corporation has 5 segments (33.5% in Hygiene Living Care Business); Tyler Technologies, Inc. has 2 segments (70.7% in Enterprise Software).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Moderate vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Kao Corporation has 5 moat types across 2 domains; Tyler Technologies, Inc. has 7 across 2.

Primary market context

Kao Corporation

Hygiene Living Care Business

Market

Household & fabric care and sanitary consumer packaged goods

Geography

Japan and Asia (with select global brands)

Customer

Consumers (retail)

Role

Branded manufacturer

Revenue share

33.5%

Tyler Technologies, Inc.

Enterprise Software

Market

Public sector enterprise application software for mission-critical back-office functions (ERP/public administration, courts & justice, public safety, education, property & recording)

Geography

Primarily United States; also Canada and other international locations

Customer

Government agencies and other public entities (state/local/federal), school districts

Role

Vertical software vendor + implementation/services

Revenue share

70.7%

Side-by-side metrics

Kao Corporation
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
4452 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
TYL - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$18.5B
$19.9B
Sector
Consumer
Technology
HQ country
JP
US
Primary segment
Hygiene Living Care Business
Enterprise Software
Market structure
Oligopoly
Competitive
Market share
n/a
5%-7% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
60 / 100
66 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-28
2025-12-26

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand TrustTraining Org Change Costs

Kao Corporation strengths

Service Field NetworkCapex Knowhow ScaleDesign In Qualification

Tyler Technologies, Inc. strengths

Procurement InertiaSuite BundlingLong Term ContractsData Workflow LockinScale Economies Unit Cost

Segment mix

Kao Corporation segments

Full profile >

Hygiene Living Care Business

Oligopoly

33.5%

Health Beauty Care Business

Competitive

26%

Cosmetics Business

Competitive

15%

Business Connected Business

Competitive

2.4%

Chemical Business

Competitive

23.1%

Tyler Technologies, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Enterprise Software

Competitive

70.7%

Platform Technologies

Competitive

29%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.