VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Monday, December 29, 2025

Amazon.com, Inc.

AMZN · NASDAQ

Market cap (USD)$2.5T
SectorConsumer
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
87/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Amazon combines a large commerce platform (Amazon Stores), a leading hyperscale cloud provider (AWS), and a retail media advertising business (Amazon Ads). Stores benefits from a two-sided marketplace network, dense fulfillment/delivery infrastructure, Prime bundling, and favorable working-capital dynamics that help fund scale. AWS competes in a hyperscaler oligopoly where capex/know-how and breadth of services matter, but share and pricing can be pressured by Azure and Google. Advertising monetizes high-intent shopping traffic; its durability depends on maintaining shopper engagement and navigating competition/regulation.

Primary segment

Amazon Stores (Retail, Marketplace, Prime Subscriptions)

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

39%-42% (estimated)

HHI:

Coverage

4 segments · 6 tags

Updated 2025-12-29

Segments

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cloud infrastructure and platform services (IaaS/PaaS)

Revenue

16.9%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

28%-30% (reported)

Peers

MSFTGOOGLORCLIBM+1

Amazon Stores (Retail, Marketplace, Prime Subscriptions)

US retail ecommerce marketplace and online retail (integrated fulfillment + membership shipping)

Revenue

73.5%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

39%-42% (estimated)

Peers

WMTTGTCOSTSHOP+2

Advertising Services (Amazon Ads / Retail Media)

US retail media digital advertising

Revenue

8.8%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

strong

Share

74%-79% (estimated)

Peers

GOOGLMETAWMTTTD+1

Other (healthcare, content licensing/distribution, shipping services, co-branded credit card agreements, etc.)

Adjacency bets and miscellaneous platform-linked services

Revenue

0.9%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

Moat Claims

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cloud infrastructure and platform services (IaaS/PaaS)

Revenue_share based on FY2024 net sales (AWS) disclosed in Amazon's FY2024 Form 10-K.

Oligopoly

Capex Knowhow Scale

Supply

Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Hyperscale data center + networking footprint and sustained infrastructure spend create a high bar for new entrants and support cost/performance advantages.

Erosion risks

  • Competitors match capex with aggressive pricing
  • Power and chip supply constraints

Leading indicators

  • AWS capex trend
  • AWS operating margin trend
  • Regional capacity and availability announcements

Counterarguments

  • Azure and Google can fund comparable infrastructure at scale; differentiation may narrow over time.

Scope Economies

Supply

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Breadth of services (compute, storage, database, analytics, ML, etc.) increases customer adoption across multiple services and improves platform stickiness.

Erosion risks

  • Open-source and multi-cloud tooling reduces service differentiation
  • Customers standardize on portable architectures

Leading indicators

  • Service attach rate (customers using multiple AWS services)
  • Net revenue retention for large accounts

Counterarguments

  • Large customers increasingly design for multi-cloud, limiting single-provider scope advantages.

Long Term Contracts

Demand

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Enterprise commitments (long-term contracts) can stabilize usage and pricing, reducing churn risk versus purely on-demand usage.

Erosion risks

  • Repricing at renewal as hyperscalers compete
  • Regulatory or sovereignty requirements drive regional alternatives

Leading indicators

  • Remaining performance obligations / contracted backlog trend
  • Customer concentration changes

Counterarguments

  • Contracts can lock in lower pricing, limiting margin expansion; customers can still shift incremental workloads elsewhere.

Amazon Stores (Retail, Marketplace, Prime Subscriptions)

US retail ecommerce marketplace and online retail (integrated fulfillment + membership shipping)

Revenue_share is the sum of FY2024 net sales categories: Online stores + Physical stores + Third-party seller services + Subscription services (FY2024 Form 10-K).

Oligopoly

Two Sided Network

Network

Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Marketplace model links a large buyer base with third-party sellers; increasing selection and availability attracts more buyers, which in turn attracts more sellers.

Erosion risks

  • Seller multi-homing across marketplaces
  • Regulation limiting marketplace self-preferencing

Leading indicators

  • Active seller count trend
  • 3P unit mix / take-rate trend
  • Customer repeat purchase frequency

Counterarguments

  • Sellers increasingly build DTC channels (Shopify, social commerce) reducing dependence on Amazon.

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

Dense fulfillment and delivery network enables fast shipping and supports both Amazon retail and Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) for third-party sellers.

Erosion risks

  • Last-mile cost inflation
  • Labor constraints and unionization risk
  • Competitors densify their own logistics networks

Leading indicators

  • On-time delivery rates
  • Cost per package trend
  • Capex on fulfillment/transportation

Counterarguments

  • Walmart and regional carriers can replicate parts of the network; speed advantage may narrow in major metros.

Suite Bundling

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Prime bundles shipping benefits with digital subscriptions, increasing retention and purchase frequency and making Amazon a default shopping destination.

Erosion risks

  • Consumers churn if Prime price rises faster than perceived value
  • Content costs increase without proportional engagement

Leading indicators

  • Prime member growth / penetration
  • Prime renewal rate
  • Average orders per Prime member

Counterarguments

  • Walmart+ and other memberships can offer similar shipping benefits; streaming has many substitutes.

Habit Default

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Convenience + fast shipping reinforces habitual starting-point behavior for many routine purchases, especially for Prime members.

Erosion risks

  • Low-price challengers shift bargain-seeking traffic
  • Social commerce diverts discovery away from Amazon

Leading indicators

  • Share of product searches starting on Amazon
  • Order frequency trend
  • Repeat customer rate

Counterarguments

  • Product discovery is shifting to social/video platforms; default may weaken for discretionary categories.

Negative Working Capital

Financial

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Rapid cash conversion cycle (collect from consumers before paying vendors/sellers) can fund growth and lower external financing needs.

Erosion risks

  • Supplier terms tighten
  • Higher inventory days from category mix or supply shocks

Leading indicators

  • Cash conversion cycle trend
  • Accounts payable days trend
  • Inventory turnover trend

Counterarguments

  • This benefit is common in large retail and marketplace models; not unique to Amazon.

Advertising Services (Amazon Ads / Retail Media)

US retail media digital advertising

Revenue_share based on FY2024 net sales category 'Advertising services' (FY2024 Form 10-K).

Oligopoly

Distribution Control

Supply

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Amazon controls high-intent on-site ad placements (sponsored ads, display, video) embedded in the shopping journey, making its inventory hard to replicate off-platform.

Erosion risks

  • Regulatory limits on ad load or targeting
  • Retailers expand competing retail media networks

Leading indicators

  • Ad load / sponsored placement density
  • Ads revenue growth vs retail GMV
  • Advertiser ROI metrics

Counterarguments

  • Brands can shift budgets to Google/Meta/TikTok if incremental ROI falls or measurement degrades.

Data Network Effects

Network

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence

Large shopper traffic and transaction data improve targeting and measurement, attracting more advertisers and reinforcing the ad business.

Erosion risks

  • Privacy regulation limits use of first-party signals
  • Measurement standards shift (incrementality requirements)

Leading indicators

  • Retail media share trend vs Walmart/Target/Instacart
  • Growth of non-endemic advertisers
  • Regulatory actions on data use

Counterarguments

  • Retail media is attracting many entrants; share can fragment as merchants diversify spend.

Other (healthcare, content licensing/distribution, shipping services, co-branded credit card agreements, etc.)

Adjacency bets and miscellaneous platform-linked services

Revenue_share based on FY2024 net sales category 'Other' (FY2024 Form 10-K).

Competitive

Scope Economies

Supply

Strength: 2/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 2/5 · 2 evidence

Small 'other' revenue streams can be launched and scaled by reusing Amazon's existing tech, logistics, and customer relationships, but moats vary widely by sub-business.

Erosion risks

  • Sub-scale offerings fail to reach profitability
  • Regulatory scrutiny in healthcare and finance

Leading indicators

  • Materiality of 'Other' revenue over time
  • Disclosure of major new initiatives or closures

Counterarguments

  • Most adjacency categories are competitive and regulated; scale in retail/cloud doesn't guarantee leadership.

Evidence

sec_filing
Amazon.com, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2024)

10-K describes AWS being supported by large-scale technology infrastructure (servers, networking, data centers) and the ongoing costs to operate it at scale.

industry_report
Synergy Research Group - Cloud Market Growth Rate Rises Again in Q3; Biggest Ever Sequential Increase

Their Q3 worldwide market shares were 29%, 20% and 13% respectively.

Provides AWS share (29%) for Q3 2025 cloud infrastructure services.

news
Reuters - Amazon's growing clout in US shipping market

Americans shipped 22.37 billion parcels in 2024, with Amazon delivering 6.3 billion of them...

Illustrates Amazon delivery scale supporting fast shipping and network density.

industry_report
EMARKETER - Amazon tries to protect its ecommerce advantage in 2025

Industry commentary emphasizes fast delivery as a key element of Amazon's value proposition supporting habitual usage.

industry_report
EMARKETER - Amazon will surpass 40% of US ecommerce sales this year

Amazon will account for 40.4% of US retail ecommerce sales... this year.

Directly states an estimated US ecommerce market share.

Showing 5 of 6 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Competitors match capex with aggressive pricing
  • Power and chip supply constraints
  • Open-source and multi-cloud tooling reduces service differentiation
  • Customers standardize on portable architectures
  • Repricing at renewal as hyperscalers compete
  • Regulatory or sovereignty requirements drive regional alternatives

Leading indicators

  • AWS capex trend
  • AWS operating margin trend
  • Regional capacity and availability announcements
  • Service attach rate (customers using multiple AWS services)
  • Net revenue retention for large accounts
  • Remaining performance obligations / contracted backlog trend
Created 2025-12-29
Updated 2025-12-29

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.