VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Monday, December 29, 2025

Stock Comparison

Sony Group Corporation vs Salesforce, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Sony Group Corporation

6758 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-29
Moat score
75/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Sony Group Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 6758 analysis

Salesforce, Inc.

CRM · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$243.5B
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-22
Moat score
70/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Salesforce, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CRM analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Sony Group Corporation leads (75 / 100 vs 70 / 100 for Salesforce, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: Sony Group Corporation has 5 segments (37.8% in Game & Network Services); Salesforce, Inc. has 3 segments (78.9% in CRM Applications Suite (Sales, Service, Platform, Marketing & Commerce)).
  • Moat breadth: Sony Group Corporation has 8 moat types across 4 domains; Salesforce, Inc. has 6 across 2.

Primary market context

Sony Group Corporation

Game & Network Services

Market

Console gaming platforms and associated network services

Geography

Global

Customer

Consumers (players) and game developers/publishers

Role

Platform owner + publisher + hardware OEM

Revenue share

37.8%

Salesforce, Inc.

CRM Applications Suite (Sales, Service, Platform, Marketing & Commerce)

Market

CRM applications (sales, customer service, marketing, digital commerce) delivered as SaaS

Geography

Global

Customer

Business (SMB to enterprise)

Role

SaaS application & platform vendor

Revenue share

78.9%

Side-by-side metrics

Sony Group Corporation
Salesforce, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
6758 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
CRM - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$243.5B
Sector
Consumer
Technology
HQ country
JP
US
Primary segment
Game & Network Services
CRM Applications Suite (Sales, Service, Platform, Marketing & Commerce)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
20.7% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
75 / 100
70 / 100
Moat domains
Network, Legal, Demand, Supply
Demand, Network
Last update
2025-12-29
2025-12-22

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Ecosystem Complements

Sony Group Corporation strengths

Two Sided NetworkContent Rights CurrencyReputation ReviewsDistribution ControlBrand TrustCapex Knowhow ScaleLearning Curve Yield

Salesforce, Inc. strengths

Data Workflow LockinSuite BundlingLong Term ContractsInteroperability HubTraining Org Change Costs

Segment mix

Sony Group Corporation segments

Full profile >

Game & Network Services

Oligopoly

37.8%

Music

Oligopoly

15.1%

Pictures

Oligopoly

12.5%

Entertainment, Technology & Services

Competitive

19.6%

Imaging & Sensing Solutions

Quasi-Monopoly

14.2%

Salesforce, Inc. segments

Full profile >

CRM Applications Suite (Sales, Service, Platform, Marketing & Commerce)

Oligopoly

78.9%

Integration & Analytics (MuleSoft, Tableau, related subscriptions)

Competitive

15.2%

Professional Services & Other

Competitive

5.8%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.