VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Monday, December 29, 2025

Stock Comparison

Tokyo Electron Limited vs GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Tokyo Electron Limited

8035 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$100.5B
SectorTechnology
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-29
Moat score
86/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Tokyo Electron Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 8035 analysis

GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.

GEHC · The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Market cap (USD)
SectorHealthcare
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-22
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View GEHC analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Tokyo Electron Limited leads (86 / 100 vs 63 / 100 for GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.).
  • Segment focus: Tokyo Electron Limited has 3 segments; GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. has 4 segments (45% in Imaging).
  • Primary market structure: Quasi-Monopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Tokyo Electron Limited has 5 moat types across 2 domains; GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. has 8 across 4.

Primary market context

Tokyo Electron Limited

Coater/Developer (Lithography Track) Systems

Market

Coater/developer track systems for semiconductor lithography

Geography

Global

Customer

Semiconductor fabs

Role

Equipment OEM (process tool)

GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.

Imaging

Market

Diagnostic imaging equipment and related service (CT, MR, molecular imaging, X-ray, women's health) and imaging IT

Geography

Global

Customer

Hospitals, imaging centers

Role

OEM + service + software

Revenue share

45%

Side-by-side metrics

Tokyo Electron Limited
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
8035 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
GEHC - The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Market cap (USD)
$100.5B
n/a
Sector
Technology
Healthcare
HQ country
JP
US
Primary segment
Coater/Developer (Lithography Track) Systems
Imaging
Market structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
88%-92% (reported)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
86 / 100
63 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Supply, Demand, Network, Legal
Last update
2025-12-29
2025-12-22

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Installed Base ConsumablesService Field Network

Tokyo Electron Limited strengths

Design In QualificationCapex Knowhow ScaleLearning Curve Yield

GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. strengths

Data Workflow LockinTraining Org Change CostsEcosystem ComplementsSupply Chain ControlCompliance AdvantageScope Economies

Segment mix

Tokyo Electron Limited segments

Full profile >

Coater/Developer (Lithography Track) Systems

Quasi-Monopoly

n/a

Wafer Fab Process Tools (Etch/Cleaning/Deposition/Thermal/Bonding/Probing)

Oligopoly

n/a

Field Solutions (Spare Parts, Repairs, Upgrades, On-site Service, Used Tools)

Quasi-Monopoly

n/a

GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. segments

Full profile >

Imaging

Oligopoly

45%

Advanced Visualization Solutions (AVS)

Oligopoly

26.1%

Patient Care Solutions (PCS)

Oligopoly

15.9%

Pharmaceutical Diagnostics (PDx)

Oligopoly

12.8%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.