VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Monday, December 29, 2025

Stock Comparison

Tokyo Electron Limited vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Tokyo Electron Limited

8035 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$100.5B
SectorTechnology
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-29
Moat score
86/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Tokyo Electron Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 8035 analysis

Motorola Solutions, Inc.

MSI · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$62.7B
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
68/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Motorola Solutions, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View MSI analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Tokyo Electron Limited leads (86 / 100 vs 68 / 100 for Motorola Solutions, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: Tokyo Electron Limited has 3 segments; Motorola Solutions, Inc. has 3 segments (74.9% in LMR Communications).
  • Primary market structure: Quasi-Monopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Tokyo Electron Limited has 5 moat types across 2 domains; Motorola Solutions, Inc. has 10 across 3.

Primary market context

Tokyo Electron Limited

Coater/Developer (Lithography Track) Systems

Market

Coater/developer track systems for semiconductor lithography

Geography

Global

Customer

Semiconductor fabs

Role

Equipment OEM (process tool)

Motorola Solutions, Inc.

LMR Communications

Market

Mission-critical land mobile radio (LMR) devices, infrastructure, and managed/support services

Geography

Global

Customer

Public safety agencies and mission-critical enterprises

Role

OEM + systems integrator + service provider

Revenue share

74.9%

Side-by-side metrics

Tokyo Electron Limited
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
8035 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
MSI - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$100.5B
$62.7B
Sector
Technology
Technology
HQ country
JP
US
Primary segment
Coater/Developer (Lithography Track) Systems
LMR Communications
Market structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
88%-92% (reported)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
86 / 100
68 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Legal, Demand, Network
Last update
2025-12-29
2025-12-26

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Design In QualificationInstalled Base Consumables

Tokyo Electron Limited strengths

Capex Knowhow ScaleLearning Curve YieldService Field Network

Motorola Solutions, Inc. strengths

Government Contracting RelationshipsLong Term ContractsEcosystem ComplementsBrand TrustSwitching Costs GeneralData Workflow LockinInteroperability HubSuite Bundling

Segment mix

Tokyo Electron Limited segments

Full profile >

Coater/Developer (Lithography Track) Systems

Quasi-Monopoly

n/a

Wafer Fab Process Tools (Etch/Cleaning/Deposition/Thermal/Bonding/Probing)

Oligopoly

n/a

Field Solutions (Spare Parts, Repairs, Upgrades, On-site Service, Used Tools)

Quasi-Monopoly

n/a

Motorola Solutions, Inc. segments

Full profile >

LMR Communications

Oligopoly

74.9%

Video Security & Access Control

Competitive

17.7%

Command Center Software

Competitive

7.4%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.