VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Monday, December 29, 2025

Stock Comparison

Tokyo Electron Limited vs Oracle Corporation

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Tokyo Electron Limited

8035 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$100.5B
SectorTechnology
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-29
Moat score
86/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Tokyo Electron Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 8035 analysis

Oracle Corporation

ORCL · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$567.4B
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
56/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Oracle Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View ORCL analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Tokyo Electron Limited leads (86 / 100 vs 56 / 100 for Oracle Corporation).
  • Segment focus: Tokyo Electron Limited has 3 segments; Oracle Corporation has 5 segments (42.9% in Infrastructure cloud services and license support).
  • Primary market structure: Quasi-Monopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Weak.
  • Moat breadth: Tokyo Electron Limited has 5 moat types across 2 domains; Oracle Corporation has 7 across 3.

Primary market context

Tokyo Electron Limited

Coater/Developer (Lithography Track) Systems

Market

Coater/developer track systems for semiconductor lithography

Geography

Global

Customer

Semiconductor fabs

Role

Equipment OEM (process tool)

Oracle Corporation

Infrastructure cloud services and license support

Market

Enterprise cloud infrastructure services (IaaS/PaaS, cloud database) plus related support

Geography

Global

Customer

Enterprises & developers

Role

Cloud service provider (IaaS/PaaS)

Revenue share

42.9%

Side-by-side metrics

Tokyo Electron Limited
Oracle Corporation
Ticker / Exchange
8035 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
ORCL - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$100.5B
$567.4B
Sector
Technology
Technology
HQ country
JP
US
Primary segment
Coater/Developer (Lithography Track) Systems
Infrastructure cloud services and license support
Market structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
88%-92% (reported)
3% (estimated)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Weak
Moat score
86 / 100
56 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Demand, Supply, Network
Last update
2025-12-29
2025-12-26

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Capex Knowhow Scale

Tokyo Electron Limited strengths

Design In QualificationLearning Curve YieldInstalled Base ConsumablesService Field Network

Oracle Corporation strengths

Suite BundlingLong Term ContractsInteroperability HubSwitching Costs GeneralKeystone ComponentTraining Org Change Costs

Segment mix

Tokyo Electron Limited segments

Full profile >

Coater/Developer (Lithography Track) Systems

Quasi-Monopoly

n/a

Wafer Fab Process Tools (Etch/Cleaning/Deposition/Thermal/Bonding/Probing)

Oligopoly

n/a

Field Solutions (Spare Parts, Repairs, Upgrades, On-site Service, Used Tools)

Quasi-Monopoly

n/a

Oracle Corporation segments

Full profile >

Applications cloud services and license support

Oligopoly

33.8%

Infrastructure cloud services and license support

Oligopoly

42.9%

Cloud license and on-premise license

Oligopoly

9.1%

Hardware

Competitive

5.1%

Services

Competitive

9.1%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.