VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Monday, December 29, 2025

Stock Comparison

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. vs Endeavour Group Limited

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

BR · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
91/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View BR analysis

Endeavour Group Limited

EDV · ASX

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryAU
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
62/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Endeavour Group Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View EDV analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. leads (91 / 100 vs 62 / 100 for Endeavour Group Limited).
  • Segment focus: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has 2 segments (74.2% in Investor Communication Solutions); Endeavour Group Limited has 2 segments (82.5% in Retail).
  • Primary market structure: Quasi-Monopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Weak.
  • Moat breadth: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has 5 moat types across 4 domains; Endeavour Group Limited has 7 across 3.

Primary market context

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

Investor Communication Solutions

Market

Proxy distribution, vote processing, and regulatory investor communications

Geography

Primarily United States (with select international services)

Customer

Public companies, mutual funds, banks and broker-dealers, asset managers

Role

Outsourced intermediary for shareholder communications and proxy voting workflows

Revenue share

74.2%

Endeavour Group Limited

Retail

Market

Australian off-premise liquor retail (stores + online)

Geography

Australia

Customer

Consumers (end-users) via stores and delivery/pick-up channels

Role

Retailer (with owned/exclusive brands via Pinnacle Drinks)

Revenue share

82.5%

Side-by-side metrics

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Endeavour Group Limited
Ticker / Exchange
BR - New York Stock Exchange
EDV - ASX
Market cap (USD)
n/a
n/a
Sector
Technology
Consumer
HQ country
US
AU
Primary segment
Investor Communication Solutions
Retail
Market structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
85%-95% (estimated)
n/a
HHI estimate
8,200
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Weak
Moat score
91 / 100
62 / 100
Moat domains
Legal, Supply, Network, Demand
Demand, Supply, Legal
Last update
2025-12-26
2025-12-28

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

No overlap yet.

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. strengths

Regulated Standards PipeScale Economies Unit CostTwo Sided NetworkSwitching Costs GeneralInteroperability Hub

Endeavour Group Limited strengths

Brand TrustDistribution ControlHabit DefaultPreferential Input AccessPhysical Network DensityConcession LicenseOperational Excellence

Segment mix

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Investor Communication Solutions

Quasi-Monopoly

74.2%

Global Technology and Operations

Oligopoly

25.8%

Endeavour Group Limited segments

Full profile >

Retail

Oligopoly

82.5%

Hotels

Competitive

17.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.