VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Monday, December 29, 2025

Stock Comparison

Reckitt Benckiser Group plc vs Tyler Technologies, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Reckitt Benckiser Group plc

RKT · London Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryGB
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Reckitt Benckiser Group plc's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View RKT analysis

Tyler Technologies, Inc.

TYL · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$19.9B
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
66/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Tyler Technologies, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View TYL analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Tyler Technologies, Inc. leads (66 / 100 vs 63 / 100 for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc).
  • Segment focus: Reckitt Benckiser Group plc has 3 segments (70.8% in Core Reckitt); Tyler Technologies, Inc. has 2 segments (70.7% in Enterprise Software).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Moderate vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Reckitt Benckiser Group plc has 5 moat types across 3 domains; Tyler Technologies, Inc. has 7 across 2.

Primary market context

Reckitt Benckiser Group plc

Core Reckitt

Market

Branded consumer health and hygiene (self-care OTC, intimate wellness, germ protection, household care)

Geography

Global

Customer

Consumers via mass retail, e-commerce and pharmacy channels

Role

Branded consumer goods manufacturer / brand owner

Revenue share

70.8%

Tyler Technologies, Inc.

Enterprise Software

Market

Public sector enterprise application software for mission-critical back-office functions (ERP/public administration, courts & justice, public safety, education, property & recording)

Geography

Primarily United States; also Canada and other international locations

Customer

Government agencies and other public entities (state/local/federal), school districts

Role

Vertical software vendor + implementation/services

Revenue share

70.7%

Side-by-side metrics

Reckitt Benckiser Group plc
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
RKT - London Stock Exchange
TYL - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$19.9B
Sector
Consumer
Technology
HQ country
GB
US
Primary segment
Core Reckitt
Enterprise Software
Market structure
Oligopoly
Competitive
Market share
n/a
5%-7% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
63 / 100
66 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Legal, Supply
Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-28
2025-12-26

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand TrustScale Economies Unit Cost

Reckitt Benckiser Group plc strengths

Regulated Standards PipeScope EconomiesDesign In Qualification

Tyler Technologies, Inc. strengths

Training Org Change CostsProcurement InertiaSuite BundlingLong Term ContractsData Workflow Lockin

Segment mix

Reckitt Benckiser Group plc segments

Full profile >

Core Reckitt

Oligopoly

70.8%

Essential Home

Competitive

14.3%

Mead Johnson Nutrition

Oligopoly

14.9%

Tyler Technologies, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Enterprise Software

Competitive

70.7%

Platform Technologies

Competitive

29%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.