VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Monday, December 29, 2025

Alibaba Group Holding Limited

9988.HK · The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryKY
Data as of
Moat score
56/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Alibaba is a Cayman Islands holding company with primary operations in China, built around large-scale commerce platforms and a growing cloud/AI infrastructure business. Taobao and Tmall Group is the core marketplace engine, where two-sided network effects and a broad ecosystem of merchants and service providers support monetization, though competition and regulation limit pricing power. Cloud Intelligence is positioned as the second strategic pillar, combining hyperscale capex with leading share in China cloud infrastructure but facing state-backed and price-aggressive rivals. Cainiao logistics and Local Services (Ele.me, Amap) extend the commerce ecosystem yet operate in highly competitive, subsidy-sensitive markets. International commerce and media/other initiatives add optionality but generally have weaker structural moats.

Primary segment

Taobao and Tmall Group

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

7 segments · 5 tags

Updated 2025-12-29

Segments

Taobao and Tmall Group

China online retail marketplaces & merchant services (Taobao, Tmall, 1688)

Revenue

41%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

PDDJD0700.HK3690.HK

Alibaba International Digital Commerce Group

Global e-commerce marketplaces (cross-border + local) (AliExpress, Lazada, Trendyol, Daraz, Alibaba.com)

Revenue

12.1%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

AMZNSEPDDEBAY

Cloud Intelligence Group (Alibaba Cloud)

Public cloud infrastructure & platform services in China (IaaS/PaaS; AI cloud)

Revenue

10.8%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

33%-35% (reported)

Peers

0700.HKBIDUMSFTAMZN

Cainiao Smart Logistics Network Limited

China & cross-border logistics network and fulfillment services (Cainiao)

Revenue

9.2%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

2618.HK002352.SZZTO

Local Services Group

China on-demand local services & mapping (Ele.me delivery, Amap)

Revenue

6.1%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

3690.HKJD0700.HK

Digital Media and Entertainment Group

China online video, film production/distribution, and live events ticketing

Revenue

2%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

0700.HKIQBILI9888.HK

All Others

Assorted retail, health, enterprise and other initiatives (e.g., Freshippo, Alibaba Health, DingTalk)

Revenue

18.8%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

JDPDD

Moat Claims

Taobao and Tmall Group

China online retail marketplaces & merchant services (Taobao, Tmall, 1688)

Revenue_share is normalized across FY2025 segment revenues before inter-segment eliminations; source: FY2025 results announcement.

Oligopoly

Two Sided Network

Network

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

Large, liquid marketplace ecosystem attracts both merchants and consumers; more selection and traffic reinforce each other, supporting monetization via ads/merchant services.

Erosion risks

  • Multi-homing by merchants and consumers across multiple platforms
  • Aggressive subsidization and social-commerce competition (PDD, Douyin, JD)
  • Regulatory scrutiny on platform conduct and fees

Leading indicators

  • Annual active consumers / purchasing frequency on Taobao/Tmall
  • Merchant count and paid merchant-service adoption
  • Take rate (customer management revenue divided by GMV) trend

Counterarguments

  • Network effects are weaker when both sides multi-home
  • Short-form video and content-driven commerce can reroute demand away from marketplaces

Ecosystem Complements

Network

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Adjacent Alibaba services (logistics, cloud, local delivery, marketing tools) can deepen merchant tool adoption and user engagement beyond the core marketplace.

Erosion risks

  • Breakdown of cross-segment coordination due to organizational restructuring
  • Rivals replicate merchant tooling + logistics partnerships
  • Negative user/merchant sentiment from ads load or fee increases

Leading indicators

  • Cross-selling penetration of value-added merchant services
  • User retention and membership growth (e.g., loyalty programs)
  • Logistics/on-demand delivery attach rate to marketplace orders

Counterarguments

  • Ecosystem breadth can add complexity and slower execution versus focused competitors
  • Some complements (logistics, delivery) have limited differentiation in a price-war environment

Alibaba International Digital Commerce Group

Global e-commerce marketplaces (cross-border + local) (AliExpress, Lazada, Trendyol, Daraz, Alibaba.com)

Revenue_share is normalized across FY2025 segment revenues before inter-segment eliminations; source: FY2025 results announcement.

Competitive

Two Sided Network

Network

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Marketplace liquidity effects exist within each geography (more merchants -> more selection; more buyers -> better conversion), but are weaker due to fragmentation and multi-homing.

Erosion risks

  • Intense price competition (Temu/Shein/Amazon/Shopee and local incumbents)
  • Cross-border regulatory/tariff changes and shipping disruption
  • Customer acquisition costs rise as channels saturate

Leading indicators

  • Order growth and repeat-purchase rates by platform
  • Unit economics and marketing efficiency (CAC payback)
  • Cross-border delivery times and refund/chargeback rates

Counterarguments

  • Consumers can easily multi-home across marketplaces
  • Local incumbents often have stronger logistics density and brand trust

Cloud Intelligence Group (Alibaba Cloud)

Public cloud infrastructure & platform services in China (IaaS/PaaS; AI cloud)

Revenue_share is normalized across FY2025 segment revenues before inter-segment eliminations; source: FY2025 results announcement.

Oligopoly

Capex Knowhow Scale

Supply

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 3 evidence

Hyperscale capex + engineering scale support competitive unit costs and rapid rollout of AI infrastructure; leading share in China cloud infrastructure reinforces supplier/partner gravity.

Erosion risks

  • State-backed competition and procurement preferences (e.g., Huawei Cloud)
  • GPU supply constraints and export controls affecting AI capacity
  • Price competition compressing margins

Leading indicators

  • Public cloud revenue growth excluding Alibaba-consolidated subsidiaries
  • Capex intensity and new region/data center launches
  • AI-related product revenue growth and GPU utilization

Counterarguments

  • Enterprise customers can adopt multi-cloud to reduce lock-in
  • Scale advantage may be offset by mandated localization/procurement rules

Switching Costs General

Demand

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence

Migration of production workloads and adjacent platform services (data, AI agents/toolchains) can create operational friction and re-architecture costs, improving retention for sticky customers.

Erosion risks

  • Standardization on Kubernetes/open-source tooling reduces switching costs
  • Competitive discounts to win migrations

Leading indicators

  • Net revenue retention (if disclosed) or cohort expansion rates
  • Share of workloads using proprietary AI/agent platforms
  • Churn among large enterprise accounts

Counterarguments

  • Workload portability is improving via containers and open standards
  • Some enterprises prioritize vendor diversification over deep platform lock-in

Cainiao Smart Logistics Network Limited

China & cross-border logistics network and fulfillment services (Cainiao)

Revenue_share is normalized across FY2025 segment revenues before inter-segment eliminations; source: FY2025 results announcement.

Competitive

Supply Chain Control

Supply

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Control over key logistics nodes and orchestration of partner capabilities can improve reliability and efficiency versus purely asset-light forwarding.

Erosion risks

  • Logistics services commoditization and price pressure
  • Large e-commerce platforms internalize logistics capabilities
  • Regulatory changes in cross-border trade and customs

Leading indicators

  • On-time delivery and loss/damage rates
  • Cross-border delivery time and cost per parcel
  • Share of volume handled through controlled nodes vs partners

Counterarguments

  • Major rivals (JD Logistics, SF) also have dense networks and strong service levels
  • Customer loyalty can be low when price differences widen

Local Services Group

China on-demand local services & mapping (Ele.me delivery, Amap)

Revenue_share is normalized across FY2025 segment revenues before inter-segment eliminations; source: FY2025 results announcement.

Oligopoly

Two Sided Network

Network

Strength: 2/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Delivery platforms benefit from local density (users, merchants, couriers), but the segment operates in a subsidy-heavy, winner-take-most arena where Alibaba is not the leader.

Erosion risks

  • Prolonged subsidy wars compress unit economics
  • Entrants expand aggressively (JD and others)
  • Regulatory changes in gig work and delivery pricing

Leading indicators

  • Daily order volume and frequency
  • Contribution margin per order / unit economics
  • Merchant supply growth in top-tier cities

Counterarguments

  • Local network effects favor the incumbent with highest density (often Meituan)
  • Consumers multi-home; switching is easy when subsidies move

Digital Media and Entertainment Group

China online video, film production/distribution, and live events ticketing

Revenue_share is normalized across FY2025 segment revenues before inter-segment eliminations; source: FY2025 results announcement.

Competitive

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength: 1/5 · Durability: fragile · Confidence: 2/5 · 1 evidence

Some brand recognition via Youku/Alibaba Pictures/Damai, but content and audience attention are highly contestable and depend on ongoing spend.

Erosion risks

  • Rising content costs and hit-driven economics
  • Platform churn driven by exclusive content cycles
  • Regulatory intervention in entertainment content

Leading indicators

  • Paid subscriber trends (if disclosed) and ad load
  • Content ROI and production slate efficiency
  • Time spent / MAU trends vs peers

Counterarguments

  • Brand is insufficient without exclusive content; competitors can outspend or outbid for rights

All Others

Assorted retail, health, enterprise and other initiatives (e.g., Freshippo, Alibaba Health, DingTalk)

Revenue_share is normalized across FY2025 segment revenues before inter-segment eliminations; source: FY2025 results announcement.

Competitive

Ecosystem Complements

Network

Strength: 2/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 2/5 · 1 evidence

Portfolio businesses can leverage Alibaba's distribution, data, and merchant relationships, but many compete in markets with low structural barriers.

Erosion risks

  • Many sub-businesses face stronger specialists
  • Execution dilution across too many initiatives

Leading indicators

  • Time to profitability or narrowing losses by sub-business
  • Customer/merchant overlap with core commerce
  • Spin-off/divestiture activity

Counterarguments

  • Conglomerate structure can obscure accountability and slow exits from underperforming units

Evidence

sec_filing
FY2025 Form 20-F

An ecosystem has developed around the Company's platforms and businesses that consists of consumers, merchants, brands and retailers.

Direct description of a multi-sided ecosystem (core mechanism behind network effects).

sec_filing
FY2025 Form 20-F

Taobao and Tmall Group consists of China's leading e-commerce platform, operated via Taobao and Tmall.

Supports scale/positioning that helps sustain liquidity on both sides.

sec_filing
FY2025 Form 20-F

The Company has built a diverse ecosystem across multiple businesses.

Supports the claim that commerce is embedded in a broader set of complementary businesses.

other
FY2025 results announcement

The overall take rate increased to 4.36% in fiscal year 2025 from 3.99% in fiscal year 2024.

Illustrates monetization improvements likely enabled by merchant tools and ecosystem services.

sec_filing
FY2025 Form 20-F

International commerce retail business includes Lazada, AliExpress, Trendyol and Daraz.

Defines the multi-marketplace footprint where two-sided effects apply locally.

Showing 5 of 17 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Multi-homing by merchants and consumers across multiple platforms
  • Aggressive subsidization and social-commerce competition (PDD, Douyin, JD)
  • Regulatory scrutiny on platform conduct and fees
  • Breakdown of cross-segment coordination due to organizational restructuring
  • Rivals replicate merchant tooling + logistics partnerships
  • Negative user/merchant sentiment from ads load or fee increases

Leading indicators

  • Annual active consumers / purchasing frequency on Taobao/Tmall
  • Merchant count and paid merchant-service adoption
  • Take rate (customer management revenue divided by GMV) trend
  • Cross-selling penetration of value-added merchant services
  • User retention and membership growth (e.g., loyalty programs)
  • Logistics/on-demand delivery attach rate to marketplace orders
Created 2025-12-29
Updated 2025-12-29

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.