VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Monday, December 29, 2025

Stock Comparison

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. vs Sony Group Corporation

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.

002352 · Shenzhen Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$27.4B
SectorIndustrials
CountryCN
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
75/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 002352 analysis

Sony Group Corporation

6758 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-29
Moat score
75/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Sony Group Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 6758 analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score: both at 75 / 100.
  • Segment focus: S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. has 7 segments (43% in Time-definite Express); Sony Group Corporation has 5 segments (37.8% in Game & Network Services).
  • Primary market structure: Quasi-Monopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. has 9 moat types across 3 domains; Sony Group Corporation has 8 across 4.

Primary market context

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.

Time-definite Express

Market

Premium time-definite parcel express delivery services

Geography

China

Customer

B2B, B2C

Role

Integrated parcel pickup, sorting, line-haul, and last-mile delivery

Revenue share

43%

Sony Group Corporation

Game & Network Services

Market

Console gaming platforms and associated network services

Geography

Global

Customer

Consumers (players) and game developers/publishers

Role

Platform owner + publisher + hardware OEM

Revenue share

37.8%

Side-by-side metrics

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.
Sony Group Corporation
Ticker / Exchange
002352 - Shenzhen Stock Exchange
6758 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$27.4B
n/a
Sector
Industrials
Consumer
HQ country
CN
JP
Primary segment
Time-definite Express
Game & Network Services
Market structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
64.1% (reported)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
75 / 100
75 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand, Network
Network, Legal, Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-28
2025-12-29

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand TrustTwo Sided Network

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. strengths

Physical Network DensityScale Economies Unit CostOperational ExcellenceService Field NetworkScope EconomiesSwitching Costs GeneralNon-core ancillary activities

Sony Group Corporation strengths

Ecosystem ComplementsContent Rights CurrencyReputation ReviewsDistribution ControlCapex Knowhow ScaleLearning Curve Yield

Segment mix

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. segments

Full profile >

Time-definite Express

Quasi-Monopoly

43%

Economy Express

Oligopoly

10%

LTL Freight

Competitive

13%

Cold Chain & Pharmaceutical

Competitive

3%

Intra-city On-demand

Oligopoly

3%

Supply Chain & International

Competitive

25%

Other (Non-logistics & Undistributed Units)

Competitive

3%

Sony Group Corporation segments

Full profile >

Game & Network Services

Oligopoly

37.8%

Music

Oligopoly

15.1%

Pictures

Oligopoly

12.5%

Entertainment, Technology & Services

Competitive

19.6%

Imaging & Sensing Solutions

Quasi-Monopoly

14.2%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.