VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

* WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON *

NO ADVICE

Sunday, December 28, 2025

Stock Comparison

Tencent Holdings Limited vs TransUnion

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Tencent Holdings Limited

0700.HK · Hong Kong Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$705.6B
SectorCommunication Services
CountryCN
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
73/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

View full moat analysis >

TransUnion

TRU · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$16.8B
SectorFinancials
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-23
Moat score
61/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

View full moat analysis >

Side-by-side metrics

Tencent Holdings Limited
TransUnion
Ticker / Exchange
0700.HK - Hong Kong Stock Exchange
TRU - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$705.6B
$16.8B
Sector
Communication Services
Financials
HQ country
CN
US
Primary segment
Value-Added Services (VAS)
U.S. Markets - Financial Services
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
73 / 100
61 / 100
Moat domains
Network, Supply
Network, Demand, Legal, Supply
Last update
2025-12-28
2025-12-23

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Data Network Effects

Tencent Holdings Limited strengths

Direct Network EffectsEcosystem ComplementsDistribution ControlTwo Sided NetworkCapex Knowhow Scale

TransUnion strengths

Standards RegistryData Workflow LockinCompliance AdvantageScope EconomiesBrand TrustHabit DefaultDe Facto Standard

Segment mix

Tencent Holdings Limited segments

Full profile >

Value-Added Services (VAS)

Oligopoly

48.3%

Marketing Services

Oligopoly

18.4%

FinTech and Business Services

Oligopoly

32.1%

Others

Competitive

1.2%

TransUnion segments

Full profile >

U.S. Markets - Financial Services

Oligopoly

34.2%

U.S. Markets - Emerging Verticals

Competitive

29%

U.S. Markets - Consumer Interactive

Competitive

14%

International

Oligopoly

22.8%

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.