VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

* WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON *

NO ADVICE

Sunday, December 28, 2025

Stock Comparison

Agilent Technologies, Inc. vs Manhattan Associates, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

A · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$38.9B
SectorHealthcare
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-22
Moat score
65/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

View full moat analysis >

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

MANH · The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Market cap (USD)$10.6B
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
56/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

View full moat analysis >

Side-by-side metrics

Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
A - New York Stock Exchange
MANH - The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Market cap (USD)
$38.9B
$10.6B
Sector
Healthcare
Technology
HQ country
US
US
Primary segment
Agilent CrossLab
Professional services (implementation, consulting, training)
Market structure
Competitive
Competitive
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Weak
Moat score
65 / 100
56 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Demand
Last update
2025-12-22
2025-12-28

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Installed Base ConsumablesData Workflow Lockin

Agilent Technologies, Inc. strengths

Design In QualificationBrand TrustService Field Network

Manhattan Associates, Inc. strengths

Suite BundlingLong Term ContractsReputation ReviewsProcurement InertiaSwitching Costs General

Segment mix

Agilent Technologies, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Life Sciences and Diagnostics Markets

Oligopoly

39.2%

Agilent CrossLab

Competitive

41.9%

Applied Markets

Oligopoly

18.9%

Manhattan Associates, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Cloud subscriptions (Manhattan Active SaaS)

Oligopoly

32.4%

Professional services (implementation, consulting, training)

Competitive

50.4%

Maintenance and support (legacy perpetual licenses)

Monopoly

13.3%

Perpetual licenses and hardware

Competitive

4%

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.