VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Stock Comparison

Salesforce, Inc. vs Dino Polska S.A.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Salesforce, Inc.

CRM · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$245B
Gross margin (TTM)77.7%
Operating margin (TTM)20.5%
Net margin (TTM)17.9%
SectorTechnology
IndustrySoftware - Application
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-22
Moat score
70/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Salesforce, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CRM analysis

Dino Polska S.A.

DNP · Warsaw Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$3.7B
Gross margin (TTM)26.1%
Operating margin (TTM)272.7%
Net margin (TTM)261.5%
SectorConsumer
IndustryAsset Management - Income
CountryPL
Data as of2026-01-05
Moat score
66/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Dino Polska S.A.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View DNP analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Salesforce, Inc. leads (70 / 100 vs 66 / 100 for Dino Polska S.A.).
  • Segment focus: Salesforce, Inc. has 3 segments (78.9% in CRM Applications Suite (Sales, Service, Platform, Marketing & Commerce)); Dino Polska S.A. has 1 segment (100% in Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Weak.
  • Moat breadth: Salesforce, Inc. has 6 moat types across 2 domains; Dino Polska S.A. has 5 across 2.

Primary market context

Salesforce, Inc.

CRM Applications Suite (Sales, Service, Platform, Marketing & Commerce)

Market

CRM applications (sales, customer service, marketing, digital commerce) delivered as SaaS

Geography

Global

Customer

Business (SMB to enterprise)

Role

SaaS application & platform vendor

Revenue share

78.9%

Dino Polska S.A.

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Market

Retail grocery (mid-sized proximity supermarkets)

Geography

Poland

Customer

Households / consumers

Role

Brick-and-mortar grocery retailer

Revenue share

100%

Side-by-side metrics

Salesforce, Inc.
Dino Polska S.A.
Ticker / Exchange
CRM - New York Stock Exchange
DNP - Warsaw Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$245B
$3.7B
Gross margin (TTM)
77.7%
26.1%
Operating margin (TTM)
20.5%
272.7%
Net margin (TTM)
17.9%
261.5%
Sector
Technology
Consumer
Industry
Software - Application
Asset Management - Income
HQ country
US
PL
Primary segment
CRM Applications Suite (Sales, Service, Platform, Marketing & Commerce)
Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
20.7% (reported)
7%-9% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Weak
Moat score
70 / 100
66 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Network
Supply, Demand
Last update
2025-12-22
2026-01-05

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

No overlap yet.

Salesforce, Inc. strengths

Data Workflow LockinSuite BundlingEcosystem ComplementsLong Term ContractsInteroperability HubTraining Org Change Costs

Dino Polska S.A. strengths

Physical Network DensityHabit DefaultSupply Chain ControlOperational ExcellenceScale Economies Unit Cost

Segment mix

Salesforce, Inc. segments

Full profile >

CRM Applications Suite (Sales, Service, Platform, Marketing & Commerce)

Oligopoly

78.9%

Integration & Analytics (MuleSoft, Tableau, related subscriptions)

Competitive

15.2%

Professional Services & Other

Competitive

5.8%

Dino Polska S.A. segments

Full profile >

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Oligopoly

100%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.