VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

MOAT TYPE BREAKDOWN

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Moat GlossaryWide Moat Stocks Home My Collections

Supply moat

Scope Economies Moat

30 companies · 33 segments

A supply-side moat where shared infrastructure, fixed costs, and capabilities can be reused across many products or services. The operator can add new SKUs/features at low marginal cost, bundle offerings, and outcompete specialists on total cost-to-serve and breadth.

Domain

Supply moat

Advantages

5 strengths

Disadvantages

5 tradeoffs

Coverage

30 companies · 33 segments

Advantages

  • Lower marginal costs: new products/features can be added using existing infrastructure and teams.
  • Bundling power: can package offerings at attractive total price, pressuring single-product competitors.
  • Higher wallet share: easier expansion into adjacent needs of the same customers.
  • Better utilization: shared assets run fuller and more efficiently across demand cycles.
  • Faster innovation at the portfolio level: reuse of platform components accelerates shipping.

Disadvantages

  • Complexity and bureaucracy: broader scope can raise coordination costs and slow execution.
  • Cross-subsidy temptations: can hide weak products behind strong ones, masking poor economics.
  • Integration risk: shared platforms create correlated failures (one outage impacts many products).
  • Specialist disruption: focused competitors can out-innovate in a niche and win best-of-breed deals.
  • Cycle and input shocks: shared infrastructure exposure can amplify shocks across the portfolio.

Why it exists

  • Shared fixed assets: plants, networks, software platforms, compliance, and distribution can serve multiple products.
  • Common capabilities: R&D, sales, support, procurement, and operations are reusable across lines.
  • Customer overlap: the same buyer needs multiple related products, making bundling efficient.
  • Cost-to-serve leverage: serving the second/third product to an existing customer is cheaper than acquiring a new customer.
  • Operational synergies: shared data, processes, and tooling reduce duplication and improve productivity.

Where it shows up

  • Enterprise software suites (shared platform, identity, workflows across modules)
  • Industrial and specialty manufacturing (shared plants, QA, distribution across product families)
  • Logistics and infrastructure operators (shared hubs, routes, and service networks across offerings)
  • Payments and fintech platforms (shared compliance, risk, and rails across products)
  • Retailers and wholesalers (shared procurement, distribution, and store footprint across categories)
  • Media and content platforms (shared distribution and monetization stack across content types)

Durability drivers

  • True reusability of core assets (platform architecture, modular operations, standardized processes)
  • Strong product portfolio coherence (adjacent needs, shared buyer, shared distribution)
  • Disciplined cost accounting and capital allocation (avoid subsidizing chronically weak lines)
  • Operational excellence in managing complexity (clear ownership, metrics, and accountability)
  • Customer trust and willingness to consolidate vendors (suite adoption, platform preference)

Common red flags

  • Breadth without synergy: many products but little cross-sell, weak attach, and duplicated costs
  • Bundling mainly relies on discounting, compressing margins and training buyers to demand concessions
  • Execution slows as scope grows (roadmap sprawl, rising support burden, quality issues)
  • Hidden underperformers: one or more lines consistently destroy returns but are kept alive
  • Best-of-breed competitors keep winning the critical module, limiting platform consolidation

How to evaluate

Key questions

  • What fixed costs are genuinely shared, and how much marginal cost drops for additional products?
  • Do customers actually want breadth from one vendor, or do they prefer best-of-breed specialists?
  • Is bundling creating durable share gains, or just temporary discount-driven wins?
  • Does expanded scope improve ROIC and margins, or increase complexity faster than value?
  • What happens if a niche competitor becomes the standard in one critical module?

Metrics & signals

  • Cross-sell and attach rates (products per customer, module adoption curves)
  • NRR and expansion driven by additional products (not just seat growth)
  • Cost-to-serve metrics (support cost per customer, sales efficiency with multi-product bundles)
  • Gross margin and operating margin by product line (subsidy detection)
  • Shared platform leverage (R&D efficiency, reuse ratio, time-to-ship for new modules)
  • Customer consolidation indicators (bundle win rates, suite penetration)
  • Operational incidents correlation (shared stack outages affecting multiple products)

Examples & patterns

Patterns

  • Shared platform + multiple modules where incremental modules have high gross margins
  • Logistics networks adding adjacent services (returns, warehousing, fulfillment) using the same nodes
  • Fintech platforms adding lending/treasury/risk products on top of the same compliance and rails
  • Industrial producers using the same plants and QA systems to launch adjacent formulations

Notes

  • Scope economies are strongest when products share the same buyer and the same infrastructure, and when additional products are genuinely low marginal cost.
  • The main risk is complexity: if coordination costs rise faster than synergy, 'scope' becomes a tax, not a moat.

Examples in the moat database

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.