VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Stock Comparison

Dino Polska S.A. vs Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Dino Polska S.A.

DNP · Warsaw Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$3.7B
Gross margin (TTM)26.1%
Operating margin (TTM)272.7%
Net margin (TTM)261.5%
SectorConsumer
IndustryAsset Management - Income
CountryPL
Data as of2026-01-05
Moat score
66/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Dino Polska S.A.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View DNP analysis

Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.

ITX · Bolsa de Madrid

Market cap (USD)
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorConsumer
Industry
CountryES
Data as of2026-01-06
Moat score
69/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View ITX analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A. leads (69 / 100 vs 66 / 100 for Dino Polska S.A.).
  • Segment focus: Dino Polska S.A. has 1 segment (100% in Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)); Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A. has 3 segments (71.9% in Zara / Zara Home).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Weak vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Dino Polska S.A. has 5 moat types across 2 domains; Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A. has 4 across 3.

Primary market context

Dino Polska S.A.

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Market

Retail grocery (mid-sized proximity supermarkets)

Geography

Poland

Customer

Households / consumers

Role

Brick-and-mortar grocery retailer

Revenue share

100%

Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.

Zara / Zara Home

Market

Fast-fashion apparel and home goods retail (Zara and Zara Home)

Geography

Global

Customer

Consumers (end-users) via owned stores and e-commerce

Role

Brand owner + omnichannel retailer

Revenue share

71.9%

Side-by-side metrics

Dino Polska S.A.
Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.
Ticker / Exchange
DNP - Warsaw Stock Exchange
ITX - Bolsa de Madrid
Market cap (USD)
$3.7B
n/a
Gross margin (TTM)
26.1%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
272.7%
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
261.5%
n/a
Sector
Consumer
Consumer
Industry
Asset Management - Income
n/a
HQ country
PL
ES
Primary segment
Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)
Zara / Zara Home
Market structure
Oligopoly
Competitive
Market share
7%-9% (reported)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Moderate
Moat score
66 / 100
69 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand
Supply, Demand, Financial
Last update
2026-01-05
2026-01-06

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Supply Chain Control

Dino Polska S.A. strengths

Physical Network DensityHabit DefaultOperational ExcellenceScale Economies Unit Cost

Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A. strengths

Distribution ControlBrand TrustNegative Working Capital

Segment mix

Dino Polska S.A. segments

Full profile >

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Oligopoly

100%

Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A. segments

Full profile >

Zara / Zara Home

Competitive

71.9%

Bershka

Competitive

7.6%

Other Concepts (Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Stradivarius, Oysho)

Competitive

20.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.