VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Stock Comparison

Dino Polska S.A. vs Starbucks Corporation

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Dino Polska S.A.

DNP · Warsaw Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$3.7B
Gross margin (TTM)26.1%
Operating margin (TTM)272.7%
Net margin (TTM)261.5%
SectorConsumer
IndustryAsset Management - Income
CountryPL
Data as of2026-01-05
Moat score
66/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Dino Polska S.A.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View DNP analysis

Starbucks Corporation

SBUX · Nasdaq Global Select Market

Market cap (USD)$98.4B
Gross margin (TTM)22.9%
Operating margin (TTM)9.7%
Net margin (TTM)5%
SectorConsumer
IndustryRestaurants
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-31
Moat score
70/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Starbucks Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View SBUX analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Starbucks Corporation leads (70 / 100 vs 66 / 100 for Dino Polska S.A.).
  • Segment focus: Dino Polska S.A. has 1 segment (100% in Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)); Starbucks Corporation has 3 segments (73.6% in North America).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Weak vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Dino Polska S.A. has 5 moat types across 2 domains; Starbucks Corporation has 7 across 3.

Primary market context

Dino Polska S.A.

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Market

Retail grocery (mid-sized proximity supermarkets)

Geography

Poland

Customer

Households / consumers

Role

Brick-and-mortar grocery retailer

Revenue share

100%

Starbucks Corporation

North America

Market

Branded coffeehouse retail (company-operated + licensed)

Geography

U.S. and Canada

Customer

Consumers

Role

Retailer / brand owner

Revenue share

73.6%

Side-by-side metrics

Dino Polska S.A.
Starbucks Corporation
Ticker / Exchange
DNP - Warsaw Stock Exchange
SBUX - Nasdaq Global Select Market
Market cap (USD)
$3.7B
$98.4B
Gross margin (TTM)
26.1%
22.9%
Operating margin (TTM)
272.7%
9.7%
Net margin (TTM)
261.5%
5%
Sector
Consumer
Consumer
Industry
Asset Management - Income
Restaurants
HQ country
PL
US
Primary segment
Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)
North America
Market structure
Oligopoly
Competitive
Market share
7%-9% (reported)
35%-40% (implied)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Moderate
Moat score
66 / 100
70 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand
Demand, Supply, Legal
Last update
2026-01-05
2025-12-31

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Physical Network DensityHabit DefaultOperational Excellence

Dino Polska S.A. strengths

Supply Chain ControlScale Economies Unit Cost

Starbucks Corporation strengths

Brand TrustPreferential Input AccessContractual ExclusivityScope Economies

Segment mix

Dino Polska S.A. segments

Full profile >

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Oligopoly

100%

Starbucks Corporation segments

Full profile >

North America

Competitive

73.6%

International

Competitive

21%

Channel Development

Oligopoly

5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.