VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Stock Comparison

Dino Polska S.A. vs Thomson Reuters Corporation

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Dino Polska S.A.

DNP · Warsaw Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$3.7B
Gross margin (TTM)26.1%
Operating margin (TTM)272.7%
Net margin (TTM)261.5%
SectorConsumer
IndustryAsset Management - Income
CountryPL
Data as of2026-01-05
Moat score
66/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Dino Polska S.A.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View DNP analysis

Thomson Reuters Corporation

TRI · Toronto Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$80.2B
Gross margin (TTM)88.6%
Operating margin (TTM)33.9%
Net margin (TTM)23.8%
SectorIndustrials
IndustrySpecialty Business Services
CountryCA
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
84/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Thomson Reuters Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View TRI analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Thomson Reuters Corporation leads (84 / 100 vs 66 / 100 for Dino Polska S.A.).
  • Segment focus: Dino Polska S.A. has 1 segment (100% in Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)); Thomson Reuters Corporation has 5 segments (40.1% in Legal Professionals).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Duopoly. Pricing power: Weak vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: Dino Polska S.A. has 5 moat types across 2 domains; Thomson Reuters Corporation has 4 across 3.

Primary market context

Dino Polska S.A.

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Market

Retail grocery (mid-sized proximity supermarkets)

Geography

Poland

Customer

Households / consumers

Role

Brick-and-mortar grocery retailer

Revenue share

100%

Thomson Reuters Corporation

Legal Professionals

Market

Legal research and legal workflow software

Geography

Global

Customer

Law firms, corporate legal departments, and governments

Role

Subscription software + proprietary legal content

Revenue share

40.1%

Side-by-side metrics

Dino Polska S.A.
Thomson Reuters Corporation
Ticker / Exchange
DNP - Warsaw Stock Exchange
TRI - Toronto Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$3.7B
$80.2B
Gross margin (TTM)
26.1%
88.6%
Operating margin (TTM)
272.7%
33.9%
Net margin (TTM)
261.5%
23.8%
Sector
Consumer
Industrials
Industry
Asset Management - Income
Specialty Business Services
HQ country
PL
CA
Primary segment
Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)
Legal Professionals
Market structure
Oligopoly
Duopoly
Market share
7%-9% (reported)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Strong
Moat score
66 / 100
84 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand
Demand, Legal, Supply
Last update
2026-01-05
2025-12-30

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Scale Economies Unit Cost

Dino Polska S.A. strengths

Physical Network DensityHabit DefaultSupply Chain ControlOperational Excellence

Thomson Reuters Corporation strengths

Data Workflow LockinRegulated Standards PipeBrand Trust

Segment mix

Dino Polska S.A. segments

Full profile >

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Oligopoly

100%

Thomson Reuters Corporation segments

Full profile >

Legal Professionals

Duopoly

40.1%

Corporates

Oligopoly

25.3%

Tax & Accounting Professionals

Oligopoly

16%

Reuters News

Oligopoly

11.4%

Global Print

Competitive

7.1%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.