VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Monday, January 5, 2026

Stock Comparison

Euronext N.V. vs Evolution AB

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Euronext N.V.

ENX · Euronext Paris

Market cap (USD)
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorFinancials
Industry
CountryNL
Data as of2026-01-03
Moat score
74/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Euronext N.V.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View ENX analysis

Evolution AB

EVO · Nasdaq Stockholm

Market cap (USD)$127.6B
Gross margin (TTM)100%
Operating margin (TTM)60.8%
Net margin (TTM)52%
SectorConsumer
IndustryGambling, Resorts & Casinos
CountrySE
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
94/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Evolution AB's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View EVO analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Evolution AB leads (94 / 100 vs 74 / 100 for Euronext N.V.).
  • Segment focus: Euronext N.V. has 7 segments (34.4% in Trading); Evolution AB has 2 segments (86.1% in Live Casino).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: Euronext N.V. has 7 moat types across 4 domains; Evolution AB has 4 across 3.

Primary market context

Euronext N.V.

Trading

Market

Multi-asset exchange trading venues (cash equities, derivatives, fixed income, FX, power)

Geography

Europe (with global participants)

Customer

Broker-dealers, banks, proprietary trading firms, asset managers, and other market participants

Role

Trading venue operator

Revenue share

34.4%

Evolution AB

Live Casino

Market

B2B supply of online live casino games (live dealer & game shows)

Geography

Regulated jurisdictions (global; UK data point for concentration)

Customer

Online gambling operators (B2C)

Role

B2B content & platform supplier

Revenue share

86.1%

Side-by-side metrics

Euronext N.V.
Evolution AB
Ticker / Exchange
ENX - Euronext Paris
EVO - Nasdaq Stockholm
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$127.6B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
100%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
60.8%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
52%
Sector
Financials
Consumer
Industry
n/a
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
HQ country
NL
SE
Primary segment
Trading
Live Casino
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
64.8% (reported)
50%-60% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
5,050
Pricing power
Moderate
Strong
Moat score
74 / 100
94 / 100
Moat domains
Legal, Network, Supply, Demand
Supply, Legal, Demand
Last update
2026-01-03
2025-12-26

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

IP Choke Point

Euronext N.V. strengths

Concession LicenseTwo Sided NetworkOperational ExcellenceFormat Lock InClearing SettlementData Workflow Lockin

Evolution AB strengths

Capex Knowhow ScaleCompliance AdvantageSuite Bundling

Segment mix

Euronext N.V. segments

Full profile >

Listing

Oligopoly

14.3%

Trading

Oligopoly

34.4%

Advanced Data Services

Quasi-Monopoly

14.9%

Clearing

Oligopoly

12.4%

Custody & Settlement

Quasi-Monopoly

16.6%

Technology Solutions & Other

Competitive

6.5%

Investor Services

Competitive

0.9%

Evolution AB segments

Full profile >

Live Casino

Oligopoly

86.1%

RNG / Slots & Digital Casino Games

Competitive

13.9%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.