VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. vs CAR Group Limited

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.

4661 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$4.8T
Gross margin (TTM)40.1%
Operating margin (TTM)25.4%
Net margin (TTM)18.2%
SectorConsumer
IndustryLeisure
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
95/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Oriental Land Co., Ltd.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 4661 analysis

CAR Group Limited

CAR · ASX

Market cap (USD)$7.8B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorCommunication Services
Industry
CountryAU
Data as of
Moat score
69/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into CAR Group Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CAR analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. leads (95 / 100 vs 69 / 100 for CAR Group Limited).
  • Segment focus: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. has 3 segments (81.3% in Theme Park Segment); CAR Group Limited has 5 segments (41% in Australia).
  • Primary market structure: Duopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. has 5 moat types across 4 domains; CAR Group Limited has 6 across 3.

Primary market context

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.

Theme Park Segment

Market

Large-scale destination theme parks in Japan (Tokyo Disney Resort parks: Tokyo Disneyland and Tokyo DisneySea)

Geography

Japan (with inbound tourism)

Customer

Consumers (domestic residents and inbound tourists), plus group/agency channels

Role

Owner/operator of theme parks under licensed IP

Revenue share

81.3%

CAR Group Limited

Australia

Market

Online vehicle marketplace, dealer advertising & automotive data/services

Geography

Australia

Customer

Dealers, OEM advertisers, private sellers & buyers

Role

Two-sided marketplace + advertising + data/SaaS tools

Revenue share

41%

Side-by-side metrics

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.
CAR Group Limited
Ticker / Exchange
4661 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
CAR - ASX
Market cap (USD)
$4.8T
$7.8B
Gross margin (TTM)
40.1%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
25.4%
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
18.2%
n/a
Sector
Consumer
Communication Services
Industry
Leisure
n/a
HQ country
JP
AU
Primary segment
Theme Park Segment
Australia
Market structure
Duopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
62%-65% (implied)
n/a
HHI estimate
5,349
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Strong
Moat score
95 / 100
69 / 100
Moat domains
Legal, Demand, Supply, Network
Network, Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-30
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand TrustEcosystem Complements

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. strengths

Content Rights CurrencyCapex Knowhow ScaleDistribution Control

CAR Group Limited strengths

Two Sided NetworkSwitching Costs GeneralOperational Excellenceminority-investment-optionality

Segment mix

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. segments

Full profile >

Theme Park Segment

Duopoly

81.3%

Hotel Business Segment

Oligopoly

16.2%

Other Business Segment

Competitive

2.5%

CAR Group Limited segments

Full profile >

Australia

Oligopoly

41%

North America

Oligopoly

26%

Latin America

Oligopoly

17.3%

Asia

Oligopoly

11.5%

Investments

Competitive

4.2%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.