VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Stock Comparison

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. vs United Parcel Service, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.

4661 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
95/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Oriental Land Co., Ltd.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 4661 analysis

United Parcel Service, Inc.

UPS · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$86.5B
SectorIndustrials
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-22
Moat score
72/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into United Parcel Service, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View UPS analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. leads (95 / 100 vs 72 / 100 for United Parcel Service, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. has 3 segments (81.3% in Theme Park Segment); United Parcel Service, Inc. has 3 segments (66.3% in U.S. Domestic Package).
  • Primary market structure: Duopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. has 5 moat types across 4 domains; United Parcel Service, Inc. has 8 across 3.

Primary market context

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.

Theme Park Segment

Market

Large-scale destination theme parks in Japan (Tokyo Disney Resort parks: Tokyo Disneyland and Tokyo DisneySea)

Geography

Japan (with inbound tourism)

Customer

Consumers (domestic residents and inbound tourists), plus group/agency channels

Role

Owner/operator of theme parks under licensed IP

Revenue share

81.3%

United Parcel Service, Inc.

U.S. Domestic Package

Market

U.S. small parcel and time-definite package delivery

Geography

United States

Customer

B2B and B2C shippers (including e-commerce)

Role

Integrated parcel carrier (pickup, sort, linehaul, last-mile)

Revenue share

66.3%

Side-by-side metrics

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
4661 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
UPS - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$86.5B
Sector
Consumer
Industrials
HQ country
JP
US
Primary segment
Theme Park Segment
U.S. Domestic Package
Market structure
Duopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
62%-65% (implied)
34.3% (reported)
HHI estimate
5,349
2,639
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
95 / 100
72 / 100
Moat domains
Legal, Demand, Supply, Network
Supply, Financial, Demand
Last update
2025-12-30
2025-12-22

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand Trust

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. strengths

Content Rights CurrencyCapex Knowhow ScaleEcosystem ComplementsDistribution Control

United Parcel Service, Inc. strengths

Physical Network DensityScale Economies Unit CostBenchmark Pricing PowerData Workflow LockinService Field NetworkOperational ExcellenceScope Economies

Segment mix

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. segments

Full profile >

Theme Park Segment

Duopoly

81.3%

Hotel Business Segment

Oligopoly

16.2%

Other Business Segment

Competitive

2.5%

United Parcel Service, Inc. segments

Full profile >

U.S. Domestic Package

Oligopoly

66.3%

International Package

Oligopoly

19.7%

Supply Chain Solutions

Competitive

14%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.